User talk:Erictleung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Erictleung (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17595 was submitted on Feb 23, 2017 04:31:34. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Erictleung (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because of my genuine interest in contributing to Wikipedia, which has been misclassified as a false positive "puppet user". If unblocked I would continue contributing to the freeCodeCamp page, which most of my contributions have come from. Otherwise, my other contributions have been for Pan-Genome and Metagenomics pages. These two pages are in the broader category of Bioinformatics and Computational biology, which are more of my expertise. I have not contributed to them as much because I am still new at contributing to Wikipedia. I have been following freeCodeCamp since its inception and I am familiar with the impact it has had on the developer community. That is why I felt the strong urge to contribute for the first time to its Wikipedia page as I believed in its importance and place on Wikipedia. I suspect I was blocked because of the majority of my edits have been made on freeCodeCamp page, which has been imposed upon me in error. My activity is understandably "suspicious." I'm both frustrated and impressed that I was blocked. However, I have not been contributing to Wikipedia for very long and that page was new enough for me to experiment with making changes. I now have more experience with contributing to pages and have now found the Wikipedia:Community_portal page. This page shows other open edit opportunities I can contribute to and links to other pages on how to start contributing to Wikipedia. If I have misinterpreted my block overall, please clarify the block and I can update my argument. As I have mentioned, I am still new to contributing. I will try to make some time to go through the Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia page for more advice on how to edit correctly and effectively. Thank you for taking the time to consider this appeal and volunteering your time to Wikipedia. I hope you'll allow me to help contribute to the Wikipedia community. - Erictleung (talk) 

Accept reason:

Taking a second look over the request and reviewing it in detail, there is a likelihood of this account being a sock, but not enough evidence at this time to hold that theory together completely, so i'm AGF unblocking. --

Amanda (aka DQ) 03:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Erictleung! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:47, Monday, April 3, 2017 (

UTC
)

Welcome to the ISMB/ECCB editathon!

Hi Erictleung,

Welcome to the ISMB/ECCB Editathon! We hope you find this a useful session, let myself or

WikiProject Computational Biology we encourage you to sign up! Amkilpatrick (talk) 12:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for attending the ISMB/ECCB 2017 Editathon!

ISMB/ECCB 2017 Editathon: Prizes!

Lucky dip prize!
We drew two prizes at random, weighted by participants
scoring during the ISMB/ECCB 2017 Editathon: you've won a prize, congratulations! If you could contact me via email ([email protected]) I'll arrange to have it sent to you! Amkilpatrick (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

ISCB Wikipedia Competition: call for participation

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2018: entries open!

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

  1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
  2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving
    synthesizing
    content based on primary sources.
  3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see
    predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list
    .
  4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at
    WP:LEAD
    . It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
  5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See
    WP:RELTIME
    .
  6. More generally see
    WP:MEDHOW
    , which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
  7. Citation details are important:
  8. We use very few capital letters (see
    WP:MOSCAPS
    ) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
  9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid
    overlinking
    !\
  10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
  11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries open!

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon!

8th ISCB Wikipedia competition: deadline extended!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Speed dating, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 21:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Frequency (marketing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

‍ Relativity 02:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Relativity!
Erictleung (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

The Datasaurus dozen article that you just made is really cool! What a cool way to demonstrate data visualization. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage says that you are in NYC. Consider saying hello at an in-person event planned at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC, such as the Prime Produce talks. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cup of coffee! Much appreciated. I just found out about Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC earlier this year. I hope to be more regular :) Hope to see you there at an upcoming event. Erictleung (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review of a possible section about marketing mix optimization and complexity in Marketing mix

Hi, Erictleung, you recently volunteered to review my proposal to recover some text about marketing mix optimization in the Marketing mix entry, thank you very much. In the Talk section, I have added a few comments to the discussion on this issue, as well as an alternative text I propose to add, which hopefully follows your observations. Could you give your opinion there as to whether I could add this new version of the text (or any modification of it)? Thanks again! EXPTIME-complete (talk) 11:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

a list is a list is a list, but …

None of the four items you recently added to List of lists of lists is a list of lists. Reverting. —Tamfang (talk) 22:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamfang Ah, I appreciate the note and reminder! Erictleung (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are a good sport! —Tamfang (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024