User talk:Esolo5002

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

September 2022

Hello, I'm BlueboyLINY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WLNY-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Network Showcase schedule

I'm not sure if this is worth adding, if you are updating the schedule in the future, but MLB Network and the BBC have signed an agreement. https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/mlb-bbc-tv-rights-deal-uk-yankees-red-sox-london-series/

"Coverage will start on 24th September with the third game of a four-match series between rivals the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox, which will be streamed live on the BBC iPlayer service. The game will be produced by the MLB Network and feature commentary geared towards a UK audience, with former Yankees player CC Sabathia, broadcaster Melanie Newman and podcast host Felix White all part of the commentary team."

My understanding is that game was on Yes in the US, but I can tell you the thing was branded as a MLB Network Showcase here https://i.imgur.com/RE3ZMUF.png TIGHazard (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Major League Baseball on ABC without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I se that you moved it into a new place. Next time, say so in the edit summary. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP block request

I HIGHLY recommend you block 98.111.253.112 before they claim The Daily Show is ending for the umpteenth time. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Astros's combined World Series no-hitter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astros's combined World Series no-hitter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astros's combined World Series no-hitter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2021 Los Angeles Chargers–Las Vegas Raiders game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Los Angeles Chargers–Las Vegas Raiders game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hatman31 (talk) 00:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mackensen (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Esolo5002, can you please engage on the talk pages? I see you are continuing to edit but you are not engaging in good faith discussions anywhere. - Fuzheado | Talk 15:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Esolo5002 - A friendly note, that you didn't need to put "Copied from 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin, see that page for full attribution" into the edit summary, since you are the author of both edits - Special:Diff/1131751754. - Fuzheado | Talk 16:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, @

WP:G4

"Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion."

However, as a courtesy I wanted to raise it here in case you had a better explanation. Thanks. - Fuzheado | Talk 13:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to harass me I will have to open an arbitration hearing against you. Please note "It excludes pages in userspace and draftspace where the content was converted to a draft for explicit improvement." (How can I make the page ready for a future article if I don't have a draft?)

Also note that was no copyright violations on the initial article. An admin REMOVED your copyright notice. But just for your sake, I have blanked and recreated the draft with a copied notice.

Once again, if you continue to harass me, I will have no choice but to take further action. Esolo5002 (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I got a notification from this Talk page from another editor[1] but the comment was removed. I'm not familiar with the current dispute after the AfD but I hope it is resolved the right way. Good luck! Saucysalsa30 (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interborough Express, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Silikonz💬 17:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Diamond Sports Group instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need consensus for a split and much of this appears to be copied from the main article without attribution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 can you please let me know what was copied without attribution. Thank you! Esolo5002 (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The removal has happened. Why should we keep an out-of-date title? --Ferien (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need concensus on what we should move it too. Otherwise we get a string of uncessary moves. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I get that, and the name I moved it to wasn't intended to be final. It was just intended to keep the page name up-to-date while we discuss. --Ferien (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An RM discussion can result in the selection of a new title that is different from the one that was proposed. I suggest to revert the closure, since I don't think there is a consensus to keep the current title. This is also not a good opportunity for an {{

Revert if you think that's the best move. In my opinion this is the closest safe option. Discussion can continue. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] To answer your question: why would they want it? What's the point of expelling a member because of procedural matters, especially when he represents a strongly Republican district that would merely elect another Republican? Aside from pro-Confederate members expelled at the beginning of the Civil War, only three members have ever been expelled — one for treason and two for bribery — so expelling a member merely because of his lawful activities in the House would set an awful precedent. Thus the importance of my clarification: according to the source, Gingrich was calling for him to be expelled from the caucus, not from the House, as can be inferred from the previous wording. As far as the reference to the Democrats: if Republicans held 2/3 or more House seats, they could expel him even with unanimous Democratic opposition, but since that's not the case, some Democrats would need to vote for expulsion. Nyttend (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
118		KMCC (talk)	Add sources
12		WEPX-TV (talk)	Add sources
7,499		Super Bowl (talk)	Add sources
14		WIPL (talk)	Add sources
34		KOAA-TV (talk)	Add sources
3,879		14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Galician) (talk)	Add sources
136		Rodney Davis (politician) (talk)	Cleanup
48		talk )	Cleanup
330		Hockey Night in Canada (talk)	Cleanup
955		University of Central Florida (talk)	Expand
58		Bally Sports San Diego (talk)	Expand
2,048		2023 Spanish general election (talk)	Expand
22		Third party and independent candidates for the 2012 United States presidential election (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
22		WHDT (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
160		UHF television broadcasting (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32		FIFA World Cup on ABC (talk )	Merge
353,242		talk )	Merge
24,863		2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum (talk)	Merge
133		United Thai Nation Party (talk)	Wikify
422		Bowl game (talk)	Wikify
906		The Family International (talk)	Wikify
8		1998 Santa Lucía Cotzumalguapa attack (talk)	Orphan
3		Askana (talk)	Orphan
19		talk )	Orphan
2		Angel Madzhirov (talk)	Stub
14		Tom Werme (talk)	Stub
30		Heart Like a Sky (talk)	Stub
262		Fort Solis (talk)	Stub
15		Roy W. Howard (talk)	Stub
48		CCH (company) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Diamond Sports Group. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In my opinion, only one article is needed, which should be about Diamond Sports Group, but with content primarily about the bankruptcy. This content can be merged into the parent article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently my candidacy was deleted from the Libertarian 2024 Wikipedia page. Please replace if possible. I am registered with Fe and can be identified through the American Academy of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery.

Thanks Charles Ballay, MD CB70072 (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, check out www.Ballay2024.com CB70072 (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a 24 hour period you made 2 reverts on the infobox, and 1 revert was restoring the RFKJR gallery to the body. I know you were implementing consensus, especially when adding the RFKJR gallery, but we want to be careful on articles designated “contentious”. Just a friendly reminder. Prcc27 (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware}} template. Prcc27 (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

]

Your draft article,

Draft:College Basketball on Turner Sports

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the

College Basketball on Turner Sports

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Peachtree Sports Network, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hi Esolo5002, I noticed that you have worked on several articles related to TV sports. I'd appreciate you looking at my request to update Jane Skinner's article, formerly a Fox News anchor and recent co-producer of "Earnin' It: The NFL's Forward Progress" for Peacock. I would like her page to more accurately reflect her career path. Would you mind implementing these changes? Thanks! Sadielousd (talk) 00:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you did this, did you read my edit summary? Did you see that there are required accessibility features that you removed? Why is that a good thing? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your subsequent edit. I really appreciate it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know as per your request that I've reverted your edit on Template:2024VTDem and added back all write-ins that recieved more than 100 votes, with the rest being included in an "other write-ins" category. I've expanded on my reasoning a little bit on Talk:2024 Vermont Democratic presidential primary, but given Vermont does publish write-ins, I think it's worth including some particularly strong write-in performances in the results table. I'm not exactly sure where the line should lie, but I think something like Rashida Tlaib's 1.1% performance, which was stronger than a number of candidates on the ballot, is worth including. Feel free to put your thoughts on that talk page! LivelyRatification (talk) 06:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.