User talk:Fanny Dürfeldt

Hi, I'm Gaff. Fanny Dürfeldt, thanks for creating

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. http://www.southtyroleanqualityfood.com/en/quality-seal/history.html The history about quality mark "South Tyrol"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

]

Quality mark South Tyrol

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be a clear
  section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk

  .

• The article was a copyright violation of this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
  this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here
  ; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required. We cannot restore copyrighted text for legal reasons.
• it did not provide adequate
  independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines
  . Most of the text was reference only to your website (not independent) or not at all.
• it was written in a
  promotional
  tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ... a higher quality than the standard requires... Independent and certified authorities check the adherence to the quality requirements.. these excellent products... it was clear that the trademark should be adapted... Quality must always be in the foreground of the message... The mark of quality serves the consumer as a sign it says and guarantees that production methods meet much higher, more selective and more objective quality criteria...

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Tyrol quality mark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Tyrol quality mark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaff (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]