User talk:Farquaadhnchmn

Hello Farquaadhnchmn! speak to the Llama!) 19:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Just to let you know - you welcomed User:Bearsfan92 today, even though he is a new member with no constructive edits whatsoever. The 7 or so edits he has produced are all vandalism. Please check a user's edits before welcoming them to the community. Thanks. - GilliamJF 17:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak english but your correction about Zelo Buon Persico is wrong!

You can verify the really coordinates at it.wiki.

Yes, I was in fact. I will try and keep up with it throughout the day. Have fun at class.--Daysleeper47 14:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar! --

Just to let you know, you welcomed 147.226.218.32 who has done nothing but vandalize pages. Sorry. (If it makes you feel any better, I did that once too. --Farquaadhnchmn_(Dungeon) 00:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what you have been told by GilliamJF, it is Wikipedia policy to welcome new contributors and not bite them. We are told to assume good faith. Even if the contributions are obvious vandalism, what is wrong with stating that the user is welcome to contribute positively. Immediately reacting in a hostile manner is acting contrary to Wikipedia policy.

If you look closely at the message I left on 147.226.218.32's talk page, you will see that it combines a welcome message with a level 1 page blanking warning. I was fully aware that the first attempt from the user was undesirable, but I followed policy and assumed good faith.

Regards

LittleOldMe 10:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No apology required, I was not upset by your message.

LittleOldMe 16:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, forgot to start it. --YankeeDoodle14 21:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• That's ok, I just did it. It's at Universal CityWalk now. --YankeeDoodle14 21:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just need to know what process I should go through in order to get my "defunct before it started" WikiProject temporary page deleted. I don't know if it should be a speedy deletion or proposed deletion. It's my own userpage and no one else has edited it.--Farquaadhnchmn_(Dungeon) 19:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it is in your userspace then it probably comes under the speedy criteria. These can see seen at

db-userreq}} on those pages. --pgk 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for pointing that out. I use a tool called vandalproof and sometimes it misses reverts. If you see a mistake, you are welcome to revert to the proper version yourself! If you need help doing this, let me know. Keep up the great work! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, i actually use vandalproof 2. I am on the list for both though. It depends on what mood I am in on how much I like it. It is very autonomous, and easy big buttons labeled "NOT vandalism" and an array of buttons labeled vandal and what warnings you want to give. The thing is, i usually manually revert, look at the history then glance at the revert to make sure it looks good. I cant do it with VP. But, i think the mass amounts of vandalism that you do catch may make up for the small margin of tricky vandalism. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Farquaadhnchmn! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

I do not believe that the edit was necessary when you removed that it is believed that the body of the girl in the coffin is Cindy Cain. I did not say that it was her, simply that some believe that it is her. However, I shall not replace it unless you agree.74.230.100.190 00:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for getting the Halloween Horror Nights articles together so we could split them. You did a good job with the split and it was a good time to put the articles back on the main encyclopedia. I'm glad I could do my part to help. Good job again. Phydend 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being nice enough to leave a message on

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Farquaadhnchmn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello, Farquaadhnchmn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello, Farquaadhnchmn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello, Farquaadhnchmn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello Farquaadhnchmn, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

Hello Farquaadhnchmn, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

Hello Farquaadhnchmn, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

Jokem 02:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

Robodick 18:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]