User talk:Fm University 123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Fm University 123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 22:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Saly Greige

Hello, Fm University 123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Saly Greige, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Saly Greige to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, LS1979 (talk) 20:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Lexy Schenk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrea Mucino
added a link pointing to Morgantown
McKenzi Novell
added a link pointing to Washington
Taylor Even
added a link pointing to Jesup

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Courtney Byrd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gretchen Reece

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Gretchen Reece, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion
, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 17:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Mamé Adjei

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Mamé Adjei, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion
, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 17:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2014

talk) 17:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rebecca Dunn
added a link pointing to Columbia
Sarah Newkirk
added a link pointing to Jackson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Madison Guthrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoover. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Fm University 123", may not meet Wikipedia's

talk 13:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hoang-Kim Cung
added a link pointing to Grand Island
Jackie Croft
added a link pointing to Burlington
Maureen Montagne
added a link pointing to Chandler
Molly Ketterling
added a link pointing to Bismarck

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bridget Wilmes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Valfontis (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Heather Elwell
added a link pointing to Portland
Laura Puleo
added a link pointing to Lexington
Renee Bull
added a link pointing to Middletown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Come for a visit at the Teahouse!!!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Fm University 123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Nomination of
Alexis Railsback
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Alexis Railsback is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Railsback until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dirk Beetstra T C 16:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Dunn

Hello, Fm University 123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,

Rebecca Dunn, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rebecca Dunn to be deleted, please add a reference
to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Newkirk

Hello Fm University 123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sarah Newkirk for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maureen Montagne

Hello Fm University 123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maureen Montagne for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Legacypac (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Rosetta Cartwright
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Rosetta Cartwright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta Cartwright until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renee Wronecki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Renee Wronecki, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion
, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leah Blefko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leah Blefko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Lexy Schenk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Lexy Schenk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Vanessa Oriolo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Vanessa Oriolo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Taylor Even

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Taylor Even requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of McKenzi Novell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on McKenzi Novell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Andrea Mucino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Andrea Mucino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Candice Bennatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Candice Bennatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Talyah Polee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Talyah Polee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Rebecca Dunn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Rebecca Dunn, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion
, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Madison Guthrie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Madison Guthrie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brooke Fletcher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brooke Fletcher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Polikseni Manxhari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Polikseni Manxhari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brittany McGowan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brittany McGowan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Molly Ketterling

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Molly Ketterling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Molly Ketterling
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Molly Ketterling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Ketterling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Croft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Jackie Croft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Renee Bull

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Renee Bull requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Bridget Wilmes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Bridget Wilmes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Laura Puleo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Laura Puleo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Kimberly Agron

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Kimberly Agron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nicol Powell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Nicol Powell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Cardillo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Cardillo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lizzy Olsen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lizzy Olsen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Dwomoh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Dwomoh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 09:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Jessica Scheu
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Jessica Scheu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Scheu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Julia Dalton
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Julia Dalton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Dalton
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Rebecca Dunn
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Rebecca Dunn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Dunn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Bridget Wilmes
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Bridget Wilmes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Wilmes
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 03:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Madison Guthrie
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Madison Guthrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Kimberly Agron
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Kimberly Agron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Agron
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leah Blefko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leah Blefko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Blefko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Dwomoh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Dwomoh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Dwomoh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Cardillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Cardillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Cardillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Talyah Polee
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Talyah Polee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talyah Polee
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Talyah Polee
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Talyah Polee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talyah Polee
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Kimberly Agron
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Kimberly Agron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Agron
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Madison Guthrie
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Madison Guthrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Tahnee Peppenger
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Tahnee Peppenger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahnee Peppenger
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Kimberly Agron
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Kimberly Agron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Agron (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Talyah Polee
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Talyah Polee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talyah Polee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Ashley Golebiewski
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Ashley Golebiewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Golebiewski (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Renee Bull for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renee Bull is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee Bull (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lizzy Olsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lizzy Olsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzy Olsen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brooke Fletcher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brooke Fletcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Fletcher (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Scott
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Scott (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haley Denise Laundrie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haley Denise Laundrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Denise Laundrie
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haley Denise Laundrie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haley Denise Laundrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Denise Laundrie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoang-Kim Cung

Hello Fm University 123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

in violation of a block or ban
. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Talk 19:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brittany McGowan

Hello Fm University 123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

in violation of a block or ban
. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Talk 19:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Daša Radosavljević for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daša Radosavljević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daša Radosavljević until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Courtney Byrd
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Courtney Byrd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Byrd
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Claira Hollingsworth
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Claira Hollingsworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claira Hollingsworth
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Bridget Wilmes
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Bridget Wilmes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Wilmes
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 13:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Madison Guthrie
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Madison Guthrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 09:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Ashley Golebiewski
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Ashley Golebiewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Golebiewski (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 09:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lexy Schenk

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Legacypac (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Julia Dalton

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Vanessa Oriolo

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Legacypac (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Caroline Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Scott (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Julia Dalton
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Julia Dalton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Dalton
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 03:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claudia Martínez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudia Martínez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Martínez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudia Martínez

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Legacypac (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Caroline Scott listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

flyer 02:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Hinarere Taputu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinarere Taputu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinarere Taputu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Alexis Railsback
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Alexis Railsback is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Railsback (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fm_University_123&oldid=1172758261"