User talk:Geoff NoNick

Hey Geoff! Smokin job you did on the Western Standard edits. Thanks Somena 21:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

On the Centurion page you say that the rank is the equivalent of a Captain or Major. I would have said they were much more similar to a Higher ranking NCO such as a Sergeant. Or possibly a lower ranking officer such as a Second Lieutenant. As Centurion's were the second lowest ranking officer. Loth 21:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Centurions were just the officer rank - they could command as few as 60 or as many as a few hundred men, depending on what sort of centurion they were. Usually, they comanded between 100 and 300 men, like a Captain or Major today. Geoff NoNick 20:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Centurions were suppose to be incharge of a century that was their purpose, the were not suppose to take command of any more, other ranks were reserved for that, such as Senior Centurions, Chief Centurions, Prefects, Tribunes and Legates. A normal Centurion would not usually command more than 120 men (largest size for a century). Then again the Centurion rank was very flexible, Centurions who had been inservice longer outranked newer Centurions this is why i would consider it to be more of a NCO. Only out of their valour have they proved themselves worthy for the position. Loth 23:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If they commanded groups of 120, they were analogous to army Captains or Majors who command companies of 120. Also, the rank was just Centurion not Chief Centurion or Senior Centurion - those others were positions assigned based on merit. As you say, the rank of Centurion was very flexible, which is why even trying to compare it to modern ranks is a dicey prospect at best. I have to say it's still not clear to me why you see this as being closer to a senior NCO. Geoff NoNick 15:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might like to know about this page re your trouble with a certain user. 71.198.89.239 06:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Way ahead of you - I've got a Request for Checkuser in on him to confirm he's a sockpuppet of WritersCramp. Glad I'm not the only one who thought his reaction odd, though. Thanks, Geoff NoNick 12:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good information you added to my query on Railroad track speeds on wikipedia:Talk:Rail_transport I appreciate it. Let's hope others add to it and we can eventually develop a good widipedia page on railroad speeds. N2e 05:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If

The article looks like it passes

WP:BLP now. We should try to communicate with Tyoung8 about any problems he might see, not try to shut him out. Happy editing, Kusma (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

You were at this meeting? Neat! Could you add as much detail as possible to the image description, including location and as many names as possible. Also, the date you specify (2006) and the automatically generated camera info date (May 2005) disagree. Please resolve this discrepancy. Thanks, BanyanTree 06:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion, and that of anyone else, is wanted here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manxruler (talk • contribs) 15:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What phone do you have, and are you well in from the border? Towel401 (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awsoem!Towel401 (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMCS Donnacona

Corvette K-225 happens to be one of my favorite WWII movies, hence why I created the redirect in the first place. I note that HMCS Donnacona was renamed to that in 1943, the same year as the film. Do you have any information on whether that is a coincidence or on purpose? Caerwine Caer’s whines 06:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm - that's interesting. I'm afraid that I don't know much about the movie, only the real Donnacona. To the best of my knowledge it's named after the native chief

Halifax, NS is called Stadacona after another Iroquois chief. I see that the film was shot at HMCS King's, the naval school at the University of King's College; it's possible that some of the officers from the new Donnacona may have convinced the production team to use her name for their fictional ship; I can't see a Hollywood writer coming up with that by himself. Anyway, it sounds like the sort of mystery that will never be solved. Geoff NoNick (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oka Crisis

Great job finding ways to NPOV this article, and with general clean-up. I wonder if we could get Good Article status with a little work... - TheMightyQuill (talk) 00:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing issue

Hi, Geoff - just a heads-up that I ran across

WP:CFAQ#Non-commercial licenses.) This noncommercial license is pretty typical for Canadian government websites. I changed the license on that image to {{non-free symbol}}. Cheers - Kelly ^hi! 23:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Patrick Cloutier

Thanks for adding the image to the

Patrick Cloutier article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Possibly unfree Image:AtlanticRouteMap.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 03:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC) --Samuell Lift me up or put me down 03:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Possibly unfree Image:1988 Atlantic Timetable.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 03:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC) --Samuell Lift me up or put me down 03:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The article on Lachine, Quebec needs some serious attention

Hi. I noticed you were active on the discussion page for the article on Lachine, QC. I don't know if you've checked it recently, but it's absolutely monstrous. Someone has added quite a few embarrassing paragraphs about the "Lachine military" and the ruin of the "cultural establishments" on Ave. 45 (which apparently consisted of two greasy spoons), and all attempts at editing the article are reverted. Do you think something can be done about this? It is rather sad, especially since almost all other Montreal boroughs have decent encyclopedia-like pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.73.125 (talk) 21:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the article is being attacked by that maniac; I reverted the changes, but I have a feeling he will resume his vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.72.129 (talk) 18:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Poulin

You should adjust the nomination for this page. The notability criteria that apply to people are at

WP:NOT covers things we should not include and it is not immediately clear how it applies to that article. - Mgm|^(talk) 14:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Quite right; I'll make the change. Thanks for the heads-up. Geoff NoNick (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversions on "model military man"

I've posted a response to your comments on the discussion page

Talk:Russell Williams (Colonel), if you'd like to respond there. Occas (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Poll maps

If you know how to work with shape files, you can get all the Elections Canada poll maps from here. I also have access to pdf versions of the poll maps. If you send me an e-mail, and let me know what ridings you are interested in, I can send those to you. SimonP (talk) 14:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donnacona.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugahoody (talk • contribs) 20:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Binder

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robert Binder, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thepressreleasewire.com/client/press_enterprise/release.jsp?actionFor=1359868.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 21:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Comd RCN

Hi there. Re page move Question : Did the commander RCN lose the CMS title? Previously the title was Commander Maritime Command and Chief of the Maritime Staff, with the latter generally used. Obviously the former changed to Commander RCN, but since you moved Chief of the Maritime Staff to Commander RCN I wondered if the title was simplified and CMS removed. Otherwise I believe the CMS title still applies in precedence as not all maritime staff are RCN staff in the post-1968 unified structure, and the article needs to be moved back to CMS. Cheers, — CharlieEchoTango — 18:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MARGEN 036-11 (regret I can't find a link to it that's open to the rest of the world, but I'm looking at it now) indicates that the title CMS has been "replaced" by Comd RCN, which is the new combined title for both the Commander of the Command and the institutional head of service. Geoff NoNick (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough then! I have no reason to doubt your word. Are you aware if the same is true for Chief of the Air Staff / Commander RCAF? Cheers, — CharlieEchoTango — 18:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, couldn't say (not disted on the other commands' orders) but I would guess the "Chief of X Staff" titles were all replaced with titles that merge the commander and institutional head - maybe Comd CA and Comd RCAF? Geoff NoNick (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello. I noticed that you have been active in the Quebec-related articles. Perhaps you would be interested in joining one of the wikiprojects?

Please accept this invite to join the Quebec WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Quebec. Simply click here to accept!

Please accept this invite to join the Montreal WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Montreal. Simply click here to accept!

--MTLskyline (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Geoff NoNick. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rothesay

I am new to Wikipedia so it may take some time to get my editing skills up to speed. The Rothesay information on Mayor needs to be updated also once up to speed I will add photos of area.

Thanks SNason (talk) 23:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Geoff NoNick. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Geoff NoNick. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vmax formula.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vmax formula.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 23:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Perrin

Hi. You may want to revisit your nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Perrin. Your nominating statement was remarkable for its omission of significant aspects of Perrin's career.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]