User talk:Gfcvoice

Welcome!

Hello, Gfcvoice, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of

Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Diego  talk  20:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion here:

• Talk:"Occupy" protests#Big confusion on what's going on --Timeshifter (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 03:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 13:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown. Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nice new stub/article at United States federal government credit-rating downgrade of 2013. Bearian (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

I have started a discussion on Talk:United States federal government_credit-rating downgrade regarding whether that page should have been split.

Imho your recent move of the article to

• Since you appear to be not very active, I've decided to file a
  move request at the article talk page. You're very welcome to weigh in. --85.197.13.202 (talk) 01:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I've replied to you at the article talk page. Unfortunately, your points are entirely without any merit. I suggest you read up on our disambiguation guidelines. Even if there were another article about another debt clock, which there isn't (much less one that is also called "National Debt Clock"), this article would most certainly be the primary topic and thus not have a disambiguator in its title even then. --85.197.25.92 (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What part of my edit was crystal ball?Sujith (talk) 04:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the talk page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2015_Cricket_World_Cup#The_West_Indies_can_still_miss_out_on_finals_if_Pakistan_and_Ireland_have_a_tie_or_no_result Gfcvoice (talk) 04:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Xenophon Team is a Australian political party established by Nick Xenophon on 8 December 2014.^[1] Xenophon has stated that he will field candidates in all Australian states and territories at the next federal election.^[2][3]

This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e

Category:Political parties in Australia Category:Political parties established in 2014

Hello Gfcvoice,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miriam Tolan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Tolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Tolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

timestamp

Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barry O'Sullivan, you may be blocked from editing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you accused me of "disruptive editing" and "vandalising" Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you believe this to be the case? Gfcvoice (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You vandalised Barry O'Sullivan for a joke. If you do it again, don't be surprised if you wind up with a block. It is not funny and it is not up for debate. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are quite unfortunate. Could I please ask you to review the content of Wikipedia behavioral guidelines, and the manner in which you have addressed me. Specifically, could you please

Separate to your conduct, your assertions that I

• "vandalised Barry O'Sullivan"
• (edited) "Barry O'Sullivan for a joke"

are simply untrue. I merely made an edit that you disagreed with. Rather than incorrectly labelling my edits as "vandalism", could you please provide an explanation as to the nature of your disagreement with my edit? Gfcvoice (talk) 11:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barry O'Sullivan's assertions were intended as a joke at the expense of transgender people. This is clear from even a brief reading of the available sources. While it is *possible* that you made a mistake here, that would be a very silly mistake, so I suggest you drop the grandstanding about assuming good faith. Yaris678 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your inference made about the intention of O'Sullivan's assertions. The inferences that you are making are not "clear" as you suggest. I stand by my earlier comment about the assumption of good faith, it's unfortunate you've labelled this as "grandstanding". Gfcvoice (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

It may be that I have included too much detail (I seem to be the only person adding significant information) or it may be time to split the article. I am asking you because you commented eight years ago when I asked how I was doing.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yahoo! into Yahoo! Inc. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]