User talk:GrEp

Hello GrEp! I, sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

— Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to fellow contributers. If possible when submitting a set of pages try to commit articles so as not to create cyclic dependencies. The editors now have some automated detection software and will spam you for two hours about broken links. Also, don't treat initial wiki pages like a word processor and save incomplete first drafts. Some editors have little patience and will hound you a few minutes after the first entry that the page is incomplete and subject for rapid deletion, even if you post a respectable final first draft of the article within the hour.GrEp 19:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you intend to write the article for

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

It's considered POV to add tons of minute details that are considered negative without giving more detailed, balanced information. The information can stay but it needs to be rewritten and merged into a larger amount of information if we are going to add details about the straw poll. And it wasn't removed because it was POV, it was removed because it was unreferenced. All additions to the 2008 candidates articles have to have references when they're added.Joseph Antley 22:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tea Party movement

I started a thread on some of the edits concerning Ron Paul in the Tea Party movement article. Please see talk:Tea Party movement#Ron Paul if you have any input.   Will Beback  talk  05:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Segmented scan, GrEp!

Wikipedia editor Theopolisme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the new article, my friend! :)

To reply, leave a comment on Theopolisme's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation

.

Orphaned non-free image File:Newspaper image of Iowa Court of Appeals Judge Mary Tabor being accused of voter fraud.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]