User talk:Grand Slam 7
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
Thank you
Thank you for your suport in
RfA thanks
Please accept my thanks for your support in my successful RfA, which I was gratified to learn passed without opposition on October 25, 2006. I am looking forward to serving as an administrator and hope that I prove worthy of your trust. With my best wishes, --MCB 01:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
RfA thanks
Thank you so much, Grand Slam 7, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 20:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
Possible deletion of Arriva Northumbria
Thanks for removing the tag. P.S. The taking offense bit was only a bit of anger at the time! I hope you didn't take any offense! Sorry,
Once again, Thank you!
Arriva436 14:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
TV9
You (quite rightly) added a {{
Redwall series
This is a {{
- Any page which is a gratuitous insult is a {{Anthony.bradbury 21:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)]
- Page is now correct, and correctly redirected. A vandal had added the insult and removed the redirect. You were right - I was wrong. My apologies.--Anthony.bradbury 21:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)]
- Page is now correct, and correctly redirected. A vandal had added the insult and removed the redirect. You were right - I was wrong. My apologies.--
Limelight Networks
I made several changes to
Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 20:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Bearian's RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. I hope that I'm doing a good job so far. Bearian 20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The article Camp Pathfinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)