User talk:GrayFullbuster

welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia! Click [show] for some tips to get started editing! →

• Thanks for your be bold in editing pages, but don't be reckless!

  Try to tell us a bit about yourself (but don't post any private information!). If you need any help, try reading this great guide to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me a question or place {{helpme}} below followed by your query! ☐

/ƒETCHCOMMS/ 18:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find

i am editing her details to make it more concise especially the television section. i am doing this with her agreement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertwilson88 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re georgina wilson

i would be grateful if you could keep my revisions to the entry. i am doing this to improve the quality and accuracy of the details and am doing so with the agreement of georgina wilson. i am her father. i would like you to email me - see my account details- so that we can resolve this matter. thanks. robert wilson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertwilson88 (talk • contribs) 06:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not vandalize anything. I am editing the page the way I remembered it back then. You have no right to warn me.

• Unfortunately, I do have the right to warn you. Such information in
  talk) 14:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello GrayFullbuster. I am just letting you know that I have converted the

Thanks, I was not sure if whether PROD or CSD was better. GrayFullbuster (talk) 12:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I recently tried to edit the Wirth_Research URL on Wikipedia only to be told that you reverted the article. I noticed that the URL redirects to Nick Wirth's biography, something I don't believe to be right since Nick on his own does not constitute a company. Will you please allow the edit of the Wirth Research URL to happen so that it may contain company information? As an associate of the company I know they are keen on this correction taking place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westwood3d (talk • contribs) 13:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit the article as you wish as it is free to be edited by everyone. However unexplained edits or vandalism are immediately revered. I think you should make a separate article for Wirth Research. I suggest you visit

Wikipedia:First article or Wikipedia:Articles for creation, then link your created article (if possible to the Nick Wirth. Thank you. GrayFullbuster (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, would you mind to check the Miss World 2011 page ? Another IP address made vandalisms to the page by adding the Top 30, as there is only Top 15 was announced in the final according to the Miss World Official Website. Please for your help, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it would be better if the official score tally was returned, like some of the Miss Universe articles which reveal the preliminary scores. GrayFullbuster (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... this is the biography of a winner of a Dance reality show Dance India Dance Litte Masters . Please administrator have a look at http://www.zeetvartist.com/did-little-masters1914/jeetu-kalita.html/ and the Result Section in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance_India_Dance_Li'l_Masters OR Reliable links or references provided in the article !

Well , This person himself has already a significance : As a Winner of Dance reality show dance india dance little masters . Some Sources am providing here are http://www.itimes.com/public/prachidesai/news/Jeetu-Moni-Kalita-Wins-Zee-Tvs-Did-Little-Masters , http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?ID=ENTEN20100149088&Keyword=television&from=bottomrelated , http://connect.in.com/jeetu-kalita/biography-1940809.html . So i kindly request to you to untag this article from Speedly Deletion . Thanks . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulmothiya (talk • contribs) 09:25, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you take a look at the

Regarding the note you left on the subject user's talk page, I have already reported them at

you should check the newswires before accusing someone of vandalism. Of course, that editor should have included a source for strong claims. Cookiehead (talk) 01:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• With BLPs, we don't have an obligation to check the newswires. Moreover, we are not the news. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are Wikipedia users never allowed to post a link back to a website they are affiliated with, even if it is relevant and helpful? I was not trying to break any rules, or "advertise" in the sense of trying to benefit myself, but was simply trying to link to a very good article which I happened to write -- an article that I would have been really grateful to find when I was trying to learn how to use the HD44780 LCD controller. Many sites link to the article, not by my doing but because a lot of people have found it helpful.

I understand how advertising and spamming is a huge issue on Wikipedia, but it seems like links to quality content should be allowed regardless of who is submitting it.

Robotics Guy (talk) 02:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GrayFullbuster. You have new messages at Srobak's talk page.
Message added 14:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Srobak (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry to bother you. Actually, I don't know whether the Miss World organization recognised the Top 30 or not, but there is a user who said that Miss World organization recognised the Top 30 even though did not paraded in the final. Could you please go on to check the Miss World 2011 article ?
Thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 13:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

gray , im sorry im responding to you hear, but i didnt know how, in the last few days i modified 2 articles for a TOK project. the arabian horses that i was told to write wrong information, and the diego Forlan article that i was aimed to write real and good information,, thank you for your answer!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.26.179.116 (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GrayFullbuster. I am just letting you know that I have converted the

]

A brownie for you!

You're the first Fairy Tail fan I've seen on Wikipedia. Hello! talk) 01:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks. I couldn't raelly think of a good username, but I do read the manga. =D 01:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2

I notice that you have recently edited Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 and would like to make you aware that I'm seeking consensus on the article on the talk page . --Mrmatiko (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I declined your protection request on

Hi,

I noticed that you removed the notable news about newsworthy stories about portable toilets (2009 US inauguration and Best Restrooms in the US 2011) These are globally educational, have been cited by many media sources and should definitely remain on the page.

Also, portable restrooms are another commonly used term regarding portable toilets. I was linking a reference for this term in identical fashion as reference #3, which links to the United Site Services company page. If you're going to remove one reference, you must also remove the other that is in identical context. Also, You the United Site Service external link labeled "Trusted Source for Portable Toilet Rental in the United Sites" goes directly to a company page. If the basis to remove my edit is founded, these other edits must also be removed unless my edits are permitted to stand in the entry.

There are no double standards on Wikipedia I'm sure, and I was only trying to contribute to the knowledge of the entry. I look forward to your reply.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanitationGuru (talk • contribs) 18:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gray! I noticed in your recent edit at Miss Philippines Earth 2012 that you changed Mary Denisse Toribio as Miss Philippines Eco Tourism 2011 to Tarhata Clio Shari Rico. If you browsed the 2 official Facebook Account of Miss Philippines Earth, the photos and articles indicate that Mary Denisse Toribio is the newly instated Miss Philippines Eco-Tourism. Although the 2 official MPE accounts ( Miss PhilippinesEarth Official and Miss Philippines Earth 2011 are maintained by Carousel Productions, I cannot cite Facebook in the article because it's not a good source.--Richie Campbell (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, until MPE website shows such, I guess we have to follow official info, FB can't be cited a source as you said. GrayFullbuster (talk) 03:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gray, I notice you started this sockpuppet investigation a while ago. This new account seems to be also the same user. Just thought I'd let you know. Could you do what is indicated? I don't wish to be involved since I came upon this observation via good-faith helping the user. Softlavender (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The admins closed the case because it seems that the user wanted to change their username per advice against using their full name. I just follow what the observations of the admins (if they think its not a sock, then it likely isn't).

Hi there. Just letting you know, when you'd like to report a user who is edit warring, but not vandalising, like

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions. SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i think the image is free, are you the owner of the image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawiwit (talk • contribs) 14:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please wait until someone claims that the image, and the only purpose is to make a visual representation of Kathryn Bernardo and no other — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawiwit (talk • contribs) 14:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

right, thanks for agreeing, let someone first with the right evidence claim the image, i will find another image that is surely free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawiwit (talk • contribs) 14:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GrayFullbuster. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of

I've declined to block him for now - he'd just had two warnings. If there's any more spam from these domains, please report to

With spam, tracking the domain is more important than blocking; spammers just get a new sock account. Blacklisting their domains is much more effective, if potentially draconian (many other web sites and possibly some search engines use our blacklist for their own spam-filtering).

We can always use more help with spam -- if you're interested, I encourage you to check out WikiProject Spam. Investigating complex spam rings can be kind of interesting.

Thanks again for spotting this. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:MikeWazowski#Master Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, I am not aware of any policy that prevents editors from editing comments from their own talk page with the relatively narrow exceptions of active block/unblock templates and the like. Please consider self-reverting. VQuakr (talk) 04:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at [email protected] and, second, email [email protected] along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We tried to use Wikipedia email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at [email protected]. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding; I'm learning by and by.دانشجوی گمنام (talk) 02:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You added a lot of requests at

I'm a finn pageant lover and I KNOW that Miss Finland 2013 will be held in May 5th. It was already earlier noted that May will be the month and on monday it was made public that May 5th is the date. Why the need to a "source" when it would be in finnish anyway and no one would understand it. Trust me, Miss Finland 2013 will be chosen May 5th. I wouldn't keep adding it if it wasn't true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finntastik77 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick heads up, I've changed your

Just letting you know that I've initiated a SPI, it's pretty obvious to me that the three Soapboxers are singing the same tune - See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Garthswest. Perhaps you'd like to comment there. Roger (talk) 10:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to

Please see Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Imus#Evangelista is not the bishop of this diocese until his installation for previous discussions on this matter. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please,

Thanks! :-) - Nabla (talk) 03:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GrayFullbuster, if you look at Miss Universe 1952, Miss International 1960, Miss World 1951 and other pageants, you might want to look at the wikitable that says debuts. You need to specify which countries competed at the pageant's first editions. So, all of it must have it. Hope you comment.

Sincerely, --Nicco18 (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GreyFullbuster - An IP (anon) user has flagged the article

http://www.forbes.com/profile/prince-alwaleed-bin-talal-alsaud/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.92.128.150 (talk) 00:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of

Hello, GrayFullbuster. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GrayFullbuster. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A number of "Miss World Continental Queen of Beauty titleholders" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Miss World Continental Queen of Beauty titleholders templates. Nigej (talk) 18:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]