This user may have left Wikipedia. Gujuguy has not edited Wikipedia since January 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Welcome!
Hello, Gujuguy, and
welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Eagleamn 05:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply
Hi, you may also be interested in having a look at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cinema and interacting with User:Zora. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 12:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Citing Sources
Your edit of the article "British Raj" made 15:47, 8 March 2006 (added paragraph about beginning of company) does not have proper citation. Please add references (and if you used a specific work, could you provide me pg numbers and bibliographic information?) Thanks. User:cnelson
Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use
edit summaries
a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the
feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Sean Avery
Thanks for cleaning up the Sean Avery page, I was hoping not to have to do that myself. Good job! AMac2002 14:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
Good edits on
Bollywood. If you can copyedit, Gujuguy, you have a bright future ahead of you working on Indian cinema articles, because there are many of them that need help! Zora 19:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
Hey thanks for the copy-edit to Western Alienation i've been meaning to get around to it for a while. GREGorof → talk 05:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ice hockey country
A "{{
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BirgitteSB 16:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Narsinh Mehta
Thanks for correcting minor errors in the article. Keep up the good work and hopefully you'll participate in Gujarati literature more and more. We have setup some tasks if you can help at
Hi Gujuguy. As someone who grew up in Toronto, I have had many happy memories working on the different pages for the Blue Jays seasons. I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to the various pages too.
prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Origin of word Raj
Gujuguy....I am surprise to see that whenever I have made correction to origin of Raj word on your article, you undo it. I am not uable to understand why are you insisting on giving wrong information to the readers of Wikipedia.
I am quoting your own source which say word Raj is from Sanskrit word, quotation No. 1 for the article very clearly says it is a Sanskrit word but you are ignoring your own quotation and insisting on saying it is a Hindustani word.
It’s like someone saying word "Station" is a Hindi word because it appears in Hindi dictionary. Yes, may be in Hindi dictionary but it is an English word borrow by many languages. Similarly Raj is a Sanskrit word and it is borrowed by Bengali, Hindi, Urdu, Hindustani, Punjabi, Gujarati, and Marathi and so on, and no one language can insist on saying it exclusively belongs to their vocabulary.
Could you start being a little more specific in your edit summaries, please? "Edited" is rather vague, and also obvious. If you're adding possessiveness to a word that did not have it, then please say so. If you're tightening up prose, then please say that. This way, it allows other editors the option to know what you did without having to view each individual edit. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just wanted to let you know, as you do cleanup in articles, that the English Wikipedia follows the British rules for punctuation inside/outside of quotation marks. Meaning, if it is not a complete sentence (i.e. the quote is part of the Wikipedia sentence, and not part of a whole statement), then the punctuations go on the outside of the quotation marks. You can see more about that