User talk:Harish MDU

Welcome!

Exit Poll

Please stop adding it. Self published Exit polls are not added unless a reliable source publishes them. I can also publish my Exit poll but Wikipedia will not add it. Venkat TL (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

FAQ for organizations

for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Spick News Venkat TL (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harish MDU. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who are these 3? May i know how did you come to this decision? Harish MDU (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harish MDU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know any of them. But you call them as sockpuppet for my account. I'm here in wiki for more than 8 years. Never faced these issues before. But now I don't understand what made you to take this decision. I usually do not edit much too..Harish MDU (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Entirely unambiguous checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harish MDU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I myself say that I don't know any of them, then how can you say this as "Entirely unambiguous" ? Hope as an advocate i had to file an PIL in Madras High Court to regulate the wiki. Thanks. Let us see through the court Harish MDU (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have strengthened your block as a result of your legal threat, as per

WP:NLT. You are no longer eligible for unblock consideration until you withdraw your legal threat or until your legal threat is fully resolved. Once either of those happen, you'll still need to address your confirmed sockpuppetry, which is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harish MDU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i wasn't threatening anyone. If you are afraid of facing legal battle, then you have to accept it. Instead throwing stones on me by saying that I'm threatening will not stand legally. I'm filing a PIL on Monday. Whatever happens, I'll sue you all. I'll never ask sorry or withdraw my statement as it's true and can be proved legally. If you need me to apologise, then I'm sorry i will not Harish MDU (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have doubled down on your legal threat, I am declining your request and removing talk page access. Once your legal action is resolved, you may use

WP:UTRS to let us know, and to make a request that addresses your sock puppetry. 331dot (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.