User talk:Hexatron93

Hi Hexatron93! I noticed your contributions to All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Muhandes (talk) 10:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Harobouri. Your recent edit(s) to the page Cyrus S. Poonawalla appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 11:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus S. Poonawalla (born in 1941) is an Indian billionaire businessman, and the chairman and managing director of the Cyrus Poonawalla Group, which includes the Serum Institute of India, an Indian biotech company --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_S._Poonawalla Hexatron93 (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Expressways of India. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Yarrowfes21 (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://nhai.gov.in/#/national-highways/phase-7

https://nhai.gov.in/#/national-highways/phase-6

https://nhai.gov.in/#/bharatmala-pariyojana Hexatron93 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai-news/funding-for-702km-long-mumbai-nagpur-expressway-to-burden-state/story-n3N42wXa4nvKlFL6EibuuL.html

the state had approached, refusing to get on board the ₹55,000 crore project, the state had got a consortium of nationalised banks to back the project. The consortium of 11 banks led by State Bank of India and Life Insurance Corporation will together lend ₹28,000 crore for the Phase 1 of the project, involving building the highway.

In return, the MSRDC has agreed to pay an interest of 9.5% for this loan that will be repaid over 28 years. The agency will also mortgage 1,000 acres of land owned by it around the Mumbai-Pune expressway, its first project to the banks as collateral.

Not funded by Bharatmala project Hexatron93 (talk) 19:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add entries to List of companies of India unless there is a specific article created for that entity; there's a very clear notice that notes the page guidelines when you edit the page. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok got it Hexatron93 (talk) 11:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The stock is famous in Sensex(BSE) Hexatron93 (talk) 06:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Premiership of Narendra Modi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have given reference multiple times but still you delete kindly revert to my changes or else i will have to take action

https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/a-remixed-economy-of-the-narendra-modi-era-11647188954513.html

https://theprint.in/opinion/heres-how-indias-middle-class-forces-a-right-wing-modi-govt-to-stay-economically-left/270192/ Hexatron93 (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mumbai–Nagpur Expressway, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Schminnte (talk) 16:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Schminnte,

I want to add the 'logo' to the page with file location as

I'm unable to find logo column in the page, Please could you help me , I tried to experiment but changes are not working.

Thanks & regards,

Hexatron93 Hexatron93 (talk) 16:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hexatron93, to add the logo onto the page you would need to put it in the "Photo" section. However, I would recommend against doing this as in my opinion a picture of the road is much better than its logo.

Many thanks, Schminnte (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it Hexatron93 (talk) 17:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Pune does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. You didn't explain your shuffling of the images, and you didn't adjust the caption to match the images. -

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at India, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of megaprojects in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mago.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to notice your commons talk page so I am also letting you know here. Most (or even all) the images you uploaded seem to be taken from the Internet and are therefore possible in violation of copyright. Please handle this issue. --Muhandes (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of companies in Navi Mumbai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 15:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hexatron93! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 15:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Economy of India

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

Tourism in India

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links are correct and accurate Hexatron93 (talk) 06:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hexatron93! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link is dead http://www.authorsonline.co.uk/New/Sample.asp?eBookID=431, you can check Sub-Port/ Jetties section of https://maritimecluster.org/port/bhavnagar/

Bhavnagar was never a proper port, in term of definition, it is combination of 3 jetties such as Akwada Wharf ,Concrete Jetty and North Quay Jetty

It is not a port interms of today's defination

secondly check content in which history is clear such as

https://www.bmcgujarat.com/History.aspx

http://www.gujaratdekho.com/bhavnagar-history.html

https://bhavnagar.nic.in/history/

1743 there was a a harbour(not modern container/lng port) Hexatron93 (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Bhavnagar port page from which content has been copied to wiki page --> http://www.gujaratupdates.com/bhavnagar-port/ but reference has been given for http://www.authorsonline.co.uk/New/Sample.asp?eBookID=431 Hexatron93 (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Hexatron93 You have been repeatedly changing the main image in the Mumbai infobox without even giving a valid edit summary, you're changing the image to the south Mumbai image uploaded by V952010. I just wanted to let you know that the image your adding already exists in the cityscape section, so adding it again in the infobox would be redundant and after achieving a consensus with the uploader V952010 it was agreed that the lower parel image would be in the infobox and the south Mumbai image would be in the cityscape section, please don't change the infobox image without a valid reason or reaching a consensus here. Thanks Joy goel (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Localization.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/tiger-trail/ab-vajpayee-india-s-noteworthy-highwayman/

'AB Vajpayee, India’s noteworthy Highwayman' Hexatron93 (talk) 11:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a reliable source — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that 95% of your recent edit(s) did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! --

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Tata Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=13620 Link is not valid, Fake links and Fake datas are full of the citations Hexatron93 (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing it , or else i will contact Wikipedia admins for biases Hexatron93 (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop getting angry with people. Rage merely causes other editors to get angry with you.

Please could you use the article talk page (Talk:Tata Group) to explain your objections.

• If you think that corpwatch.org is not valid, please could you explain at Talk:Tata Group why you think that. That will most likely lead to other editors assessing the article on corpwatch.org. There is not much point in your deleting it now, if everybody else re-adds it in the future.
• Your edit to Tata Group claimed that the sources did not support the claim of political corruption. Please could you explain that at Talk:Tata Group. Did you look at all the sources cited for that claim?

I was going to revert you, but I noticed that one of the other citations in that section was completely irrelevant to the claim that it is cited for. So I thought that the best thing to do was to encourage you to start a talk page discussion.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting angry , you didn't verified the links given and i had to remove a false fact about mass killings which is totally unacceptable

You know how fast fake news spreads and people working on these companies can be targeted for nothing by miscreants, Disinformation spreads very fast Hexatron93 (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chandrayaan-3, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bhimbetka is in Raisen district. You made edit claiming it to be in Bhopal district. Please do not make such wrong edits. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jio into Jio Platforms. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I’ve reverted all of your edits to California Burrito Co. because you’ve left the article in an haphazard state. You appear to have mistaken it for a similarly-named company, and made major yet selective edits that resulted in an article that reflects neither company accurately. You removed a seven year old valid source from NBC, calling it “fake news.” Please take more care when making such fundamental changes to articles. Celjski Grad (talk) 18:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I’ve reverted your edit [1] to Mishra Dhatu Nigam because you removed sourced information from an interview with Mishra Datum Nigam’s chairman and called it a “false reference.” If you have reason to believe the source is fabricated, please share it on the article talk page. Celjski Grad (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your edit to Economy of India has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 12:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have made another set of ill-advised edits to the article on the Economy of India.[2] You deleted a sentence that had a citation, and replaced it with the following paragraph:

As per Consultant Review, The Indian management consulting industry is expected to reach more than Rs. 30,000 crores (US $5 billion), growing at a CAGR of 30%. A report from two different analyst firms states that the Indian management consulting industry is continuing to grow rapidly. The market is currently valued between $1.4 and $2.1 billion.There are 10,00,000 employees working in the management consulting industry in India whereas the count for the same in the world is 17 million.There are 47,000 management consulting companies in India.^[1]

Regarding the statement about Rs. 30,000 crores, the source says that "In India Management consulting is estimated to be a Rs. 30,000 crore industry", i.e. that it is now. So what you wrote was a misunderstanding.

Regarding the other statements, you need to provide citations for all of them, and the citations need to be from reliable sources that explicitly support them.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Economy of India without adequately explaining why.[3] In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Cloud storage. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RapidX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Please could you arrange that these edits by Hexatron93 to Economy of India are revedelled; I have reverted the edits in question. Those that I have checked are copyright violations. What Hexatron93 has done is to copy-and-paste text from sources into Wikipedia and made minimal alterations. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I think, although there are a lot. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Toddy1 (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please acknowledge that you understand our copyright policy or open a discussion if you disagree that your recent edits are a violation of our copyright policy. Absent an explanation, if I see another copyright violation you will be blocked. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Apologies for single wrong citation, i have made mistake Hexatron93 (talk) 13:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is troubling. The issue isn't a single wrong citation It is widespread copyright violations. You must cease or you will will be blocked. If you don't understand please ask. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what is the procedure for ceasing the account Hexatron93 (talk) 05:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to stop editing Wikipedia, just stop editing.

But please do not start a new account under a different name. If you do then both this account and the new account will be blocked for sockpuppetry and the edits under the new account reverted or struckthrough.

So if you want to edit Wikipedia in the future, just take a break from Wikipedia, and when you are ready, resume editing using the Hexatron93 account.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hexatron93. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]