User talk:HokieRNB

This comment today rings so true. Does that remind you of something? The whole discussion started today on my talk and I am beginning to see the situation more clearly based on what he said. History2007 (talk) 21:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait: New plan--smuggle bats on a plane. ;)

--Flynnlives (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came upon your involvement in the AfD nomination of an article about a missionary by the name of Johannes Maas (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) (2nd nomination) for the discussion). I have nominated Worldwide Faith Missions, another article which was written by the same author as the Johannes Maas article, up for AfD. I have also seen from your contributions to Wikipedia, that you are active on articles concerning Christianity. I am no expert on Christian organisations and have tried finding sources on Google to verify the notability of the subject. After having ploughed through many Google results, I have not been able to find one reliable source to establish Worldwide Faith Missions as a notable NGO. Perhaps you have access to sources on Christian NGO's which relate to this subject but are not available through Google? Apart from the author of the Worldwide Faith Missions article and myself, there has been no response so far on its AfD page. Would you mind having a look at this AfD perhaps? You can find it here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Faith Missions. I have also asked other Wikipedia contributors (see User_talk:Phil_Bridger#Johannes_Maas_and_Worldwide_Faith_Missions and User_talk:Ἀλήθεια#Johannes_Maas_and_Worldwide_Faith_Missions) who were active on the Johannes Maas AfD discussion, to contribute to the present AfD. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 04:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As of June 2012 I will be semi-retiring from Wikipedia. I will still watch a few pages every day or two, but not watch many pages every day as before.

Could I ask you to occasionally watch a few more pages that have good referenced content and should really be saved from vandalism, fringe views, sudden mergers, etc.? I think you already watch a few of these, but here is a list in any case:

• WP:RS/AC
  , please provide a WP:RS source that says 'most historians hold that Jesus did not exist' instead of arguing about it here". The debate always stops after that.

• Crucifixion of Jesus: Again, pretty stable, as you know.

• Christ, the Ministry of Jesus and Chronology of Jesus. All three pages are highly stable and fully sourced. They just need to be watched. There is also Nativity of Jesus
  .

• Tacitus on Christ as well as Annals (Tacitus)
  . These are three historically important pages. All three are fully referenced but frequently get large scale vandalism. They do need watching. Josephus on Jesus was the subject of a really long discussion and every possible aspect of it is now covered in the talk page archives. It has been researched in great detail and as questions come up the talk page archives almost always handle that.

• Religious perspectives on Jesus, Jesus in Christianity, Sayings of Jesus on the cross, Imitation of Christ and Love of Christ: Again, very stable pages and it is just a question of looking out for merge flags, etc.

Your help in watching these as your time allows will be greatly appreciated. And thank you for all the good interactions we have had in the past years. History2007 (talk) 14:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indelible Grace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since I asked intrinsic dignity about this, I might as well ask you the same:

It does look like there is more than a potential conflict of interest here. May I ask you to do the following:

• Read
  WP:COI
• State on your user page if you do have a conflict of interest.
• under "External links" or in the text of the article, post some sources that you consider "tell the other side" fairly and without hype?

This will help everybody decide if there is a real COI and whether you can present an NPOV. Thanks for your help. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!
History2007 (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and good job on your comments made on Talk:Genesis creation narrative. Musdan77 (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you do not like me. Still, I would have hoped you had the integrity to not reflexively revert me without adding any discussion of your own even though I explained my edits (until your second "undo" when I called you out). And I'll betcha you don't think all of the addition is good, either, and might even have approved of some of my rewording, if not the removal of the tables. Maybe my take is wrong, though, and you really do think my entire edit was wrong and your reversions were not fits of pique. I hope so, anyway. I do find it strange that you would lock in a reversion with the help of an editor who had not ever edited the article, yet makes his/her first edit in over a year, just minutes after I made my edits and explanation. Hoppingalong (talk) 02:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indelible Grace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indelible Grace until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Phenomenon.

jps (talk) 04:21, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, back on September 17, 2008, you added "after whom what is now called Cape Henlopen was originally named.", with a reference to the "Delaware" article on etymonline.com, but I can't see anything there regarding Cape Henlopen (not even when looking the article up on archive.org from when it was retrieved in 2007). Is there another source for this information? LordEniac (talk) 01:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's documented in plenty of books like Uniquely Delaware by Katie Moose (

ISBN 081172672X), The National gazetteer of the United States of America: Delaware 1983 by the United States Board on Geographic Names, and The world-wide encyclopedia and gazetteer by William Harrison De Puy (1908), as well as in a 1988 pamphlet called "CAPE HENLOPEN THROUGH HISTORY". This is just in the first screen of google results. HokieRNB 22:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Go Hokies (talk) 23:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Awana logo.png

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, HokieRNB. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UDEL logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

ICU

Flynnlives (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HokieRNB. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HokieRNB. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:House Fox icon.png

The file File:House Fox icon.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LE team.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in Little People (toys)

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:LE team.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LE team.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KeaggyTrueBeliever.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KeaggyTrueBeliever.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]