User talk:Holidayruin

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roh Moo-hyun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Your draft article,

Draft:DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ

Hello, Holidayruin. It has been over six months since you last edited the

DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Holidayruin. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at United States v. McMahon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Holidayruin please don't remove the 2nd part of the sentence "that tells a "Romeo and Juliet tale" of young Ukrainian Hutsul lovers trapped on opposite sides of a Carpathian family blood feud." This statement is taken straight from the source attached to that sentence: Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors. Turner Classic Movies. 2021 (https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/490774/shadows-of-forgotten-ancestors#overview). Please don't remove statements backed by sources.

I reversed your edit and returned that statement https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shadows_of_Forgotten_Ancestors&diff=1102029708&oldid=1100245455 - please don't engage in further edit war and please leave that statement there. Thanks. 38.88.221.163 (talk) 01:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Holidayruin, I don't feel particularly strongly about such a small change. I do want to make sure that you don't mark reverts of others edits as minor edits as you did in this edit. You can read more about minor edits here. Anyways, I think the meaning is perfectly clear without the extra word, as space is at a premium in infoboxes. Shall we ask the talk page and see what others think? Grey Wanderer (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey Wanderer: Gotcha about the revert and minor edit mark. Honestly I don't care much either, but I changed it because upon reading the article because the wording immediately struck me as awkward and just a little vague. I just don't want the article to leave the same impression with others when it could be smoothed over with a single word. Holidayruin (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do see your point. I’ll defer to you, assuming others could be similarly struck. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I noticed you have some experience with Korean content. If it catches your interest would you mind taking a look at Mun Choi, an article I created about a Korean-American? Other users have added details overtime, and I'm not educated enough on Korean culture to verify some of these details, such as his Korean name, possible birthplace, etc. Thanks, and no pressure if you don't have the time. Grey Wanderer (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey Wanderer: Hey there, thanks for reaching out. For Korean-Americans like Choi pretty much all information would be in English, so I believe there's not much of an information gap between us. I did verify his Korean name given the Korean-language source (although I can't verify the Hanja spelling because I don't know Hanja... Hanja is basically unused nowadays). I also found a local news article that stated his birthplace as Seoul, so I added that and a little about his immigration. Holidayruin (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking it out! Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you revert your second-to-last edit please? He isn't the first ethnic minority PM, ...nor will he be our first ethnic minority prime minister – that was achieved by Benjamin Disraeli, who was Jewish... - The Telegraph. GhulamIslam (talk) 16:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhulamIslam: This is a good point. It appears that my edit was reverted anyways, and a discussion is underway in the talk page about this. But thank you for bringing this up. Holidayruin (talk) 17:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

List of presidents of the Congress of the Republic of Peru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, - You reverted my edit saying that Salem is apparently her cat. But The Guardian explicitly says "Sabrina picked the stupidest name she could think of, and began work on Makin’ Magick, her debut album, with some help from her sibling, who she refers to as Salem", and Alt Press mentions "the two brainchildren behind the project — who go by DJ Sabrina and Salem". Alt Press also mentions a cat but says it's "not canon, per se". Do you have a source that explains whether or not Salem is, in fact, a cat? HarryKernow (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Australia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moxy- 23:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Saul. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Remsense聊 00:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your criticism of the edit is not relevant to the actual edit itself. It was a simple change to a sentence that never went against MOS. This is in bad faith and I know it. Holidayruin (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's that the edit was confusing and ungrammatical and I wanted to be polite about it. Remsense聊 01:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Park Jong-cheol.png

Thanks for uploading File:Park Jong-cheol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]