User talk:Huey117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Ferguson (actor) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDb is not a reliable source I'm afraid as it is user edited.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Huey117! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images...

I can help with images - tricks to help cut out the aggravation...hit me up at [email protected].CaliBuds (talk) 13:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Matt Maltese
(August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission appears to
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Matt Maltese
(August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:
This submission is not adequately supported by
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to remove all sales sites as references such as Apple Music and Spotify.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Maltese has been accepted

Matt Maltese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vega Jane has been accepted

Vega Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 18:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for creating
WP:NBOOK criterion #1). We underrepresent youth fiction a bit on Wikipedia, I guess because the readers are generally a bit too young to edit, so it's nice to see someone working in this area. — Bilorv (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you so much, Bilorv, I wasn't expecting the article to be accepted so soon, thank you, and I'll definitely work to improve it. Huey117 (talk) 03:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1971 Qantas bomb hoax has been accepted

1971 Qantas bomb hoax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your support Marathi.Wiki.Editor (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries Marathi.Wiki.Editor, if you ever need help, don't be afraid to ask me or the teahouse :) Huey117 (talk) 04:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1971 Qantas bomb hoax

On 19 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1971 Qantas bomb hoax, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Macari extorted $500,000 from Qantas Airways, and that more than $200,000 remains unaccounted for? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1971 Qantas bomb hoax. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1971 Qantas bomb hoax), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My question is why didn't you approve this Wikipedia Page?

Dear Sir,

I am Anshuman Tiwari Indian Musical artist from Dehradun Uttarakhand. My question is why didn't you approve this Wikipedia Page? The sources of the book are also included in this Wikipedia Page. All reliable sources are included in this Wikipedia Page.

I have also seen many such pages in Wikipedia, there is no source on them. Even then that page is published on Wikipedia.

I don't understand why you do this. When will you publish my page?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anshuman_Tiwari_(musician) Officialanshumantiwari (talk) 09:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well to put it simply: I didn't. But despite what reliable sources you may have included, your article wasn't accepted because of self promotion, sorry. Huey117 (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding Draft:The Darkest Minds (book series)

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 01:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huey117&oldid=1124502504"