Was due to me trying to direct the English to the American spelling, and doing the spelling the same way twice. Please let me know if not fixed, now. SBHarris 04:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Swivel Sweeper.jpg)
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Why did you place the speedy deletion notice on the Joan Perez de Lazarraga article? Lazarraga is a major figure in the history of Basque literature, as is stated in the article. Madler 04:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't answered my question. Why did you put the tag on the article? Madler 04:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you tagged it because it was a poor article, lacked information, and had broken links, why was the reason for the tag stated as being that the article lacked any indication of the importance of the topic? Madler 04:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read the third sentence? I'll quote it for you: "As a writer, he was one of the only Renaissance authors in Basque-language literature, together with Bernard Etxepare." How about the sixth sentence? "It is one of the only Basque-language texts which has reached us from the 16th century, and the oldest from the southern Basque Country." This doesn't give you an indication of the importance of the subject? The reason I'm asking is because what you did looks pretty malicious, like a kind of vandalism, and I'm considering reporting you if you can't explain why those two sentences were not enough to communicate to you the importance of the subject. If I hadn't been around to catch you on this, the article might've been deleted. Madler 04:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]