User talk:IceCreamAntisocial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /DYK


Welcome to my talk page. How can I help you?



DYK nomination of Lupinus sericeus

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK problem

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HurricaneFan25 18:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]


Nice work. I once spent a morning helping poison a patch of the stuff by hand to keep it from beating out the local Stylisma pickeringii. Are you familiar with either Biodiversity Heritage Library or Botanicus? Between them, they have all but the past few years of American Fern Journal and many of the East Coast botanical journals available free online; maybe there's something there you'll find useful for your coast. Choess (talk) 07:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


DYK nomination of Carex inops

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Arctic Night 19:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]


A barnstar for you!

The Bio-star
To IceCreamAntisocial in appreciation of his work advancing the coverage of plants on Wikipedia. Very fine body of work! ;) Rcej (Robert)talk 09:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Your plant in a quintuple hook!

Just an fyi. ;) Rcej (Robert)talk 04:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Greetings, IceCreamAntisocial! Just dropping by to let you know I've nominated Salix alaxensis for DYK. Cheers! :) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK nomination of Smilax laurifolia

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]


A Barnstar for you

WPOR Award: Sponsored in part by the
Big Gold Dude
.
You are hereby granted this shiny object for all your hard work at
WikiProject Oregon!
For making us aware of rare Oregon plants like Amsinckia carinata and lighting up our new article list with beautiful well-sourced articles. Cheers! Valfontis (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]


New Panicum repens article

The Bio-star
Thanks for your contributions to improve Wikipedia, including the new article you created, Panicum repens. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IceCreamAntisocial & Rcej. Can any more info be added to the articles as suggested by the DYK reviewer, please? Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Salix arbusculoides" somehow got promoted by itself. Not sure what to do with the other 5. I'll try to make hooks for them on Template:Did you know nominations/Salix richardsonii, Salix brachycarpa, Salix glauca, Salix hastata, Salix pulchra. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Corema conradii

I've "sexed this up" with a little more info on the event that prompted Martine et al. to write their paper and submitted it for DYK. It was a pleasure to see you create this; I got to see one of the few other Pine Barrens populations in bud last year. Choess (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Carex petasata for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carex petasata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carex petasata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WOLfan112 (talk) 18:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Hi, I recently noticed your work on Euphorbia purpurea and Matelea alabamensis, both with connections to my home state (although sadly one is now thought extinct there) and just wanted to say thank you very much! Altairisfar (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again

...for making some unusual plants appear in Wikipedia, in this case Narthecium americanum. I should be able to get a photo for that this summer. (I'll try to get it in bloom at Webb's Mill, but I should be visiting Warren Grove in the fall.) I might just stumble across Euphorbia purpurea elsewhere (I'll be botanizing something else in an area with known populations), but that's likely to be harder to spot. Choess (talk) 06:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Precious

plant life
Thank you for raising our awareness for the treasure of plants, often overlooked or endangered, with their silent meaning for our life, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A year ago, you were the 78th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

  • Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the
    Sarah (talk) 01:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)|}[reply
    ]


Double DYK review

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Invitation

Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
You are invited to the second
chat} 03:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from
Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite
.


Sanicula graveolens

Hi IceCreamAntisocial; Nice work on Sanicula graveolens. I added an image to the taxobox just now. Best wishes, --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paspalum vaginatum

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Poa fendleriana

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Vaccinium oxycoccos

Thanks from Wikipedia and the DYK team Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Use of Italics

Greetings, I am visiting because I've noticed your contributions posted in Colorado Project articles; those pertaining to genus and species that are italicized (some genus italicized, some genus not italicized) and some article titles which are italicized have intrigued my curiosity. Why the italics are being used (in particular the list of recent articles and changes at the WP:Colorado section)? I am a recently new editor and so far I've found that the use of italics refer to book titles, and certain other policy/guideline factors discouraging use of italics for emphasis. This is just my need to know (biology taxonomically) about italicized species and genus. And as an end note - kudos on all your contributions, hopefully I might be able to emulate the efforts in my own contributions  O = M C 4  17:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definately handy information to know. When handwritten, how are they denoted and why not the higher orders? Thanks for such a speedy response and for the links above.  O = M C 4  21:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While reviewing the links above, I made some edits. My boldness increases with every edit; so far I have no peer reviews or comments of such edits and would appreciate some feedback should you be so inclined. Thanks again, this has been a viable learning experience for this new editor.  O = M C 4  22:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Neoparrya lithophila

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply