User talk:Idont Havaname
This user may have left Wikipedia. Idont Havaname has not edited Wikipedia since June 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I've nominated it for deletion again. As a previous participant in the debate I thought you'd be interested. Duggy 1138 08:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me, but could you explain to me the precise reason of his/her banning? --Baxtaba 12:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Idont Havaname mentions this on Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Deltabeignet.
- I actually came here to thank you for your comment there, and to clarify some misunderstandings. Since the RfA page is not a discussion page I'm writing this here; please feel free to move this to a more appropriate place if you're aware of one.
- There is no "dispute between Deltabeignet and SebastianHelm". Deltabeignet admitted to having disrupted Wikipedia for three months, and all I did was to bring it to the attention of the authorities. Please apply WP:FAITHand don't put me in a pigeon hole. That said, I realize that I probably have been more emotional than what would have been wise when I brought up the case; please understand that I am really frustrated to be reporting what I consider a crime and nobody has acted on it for two days so far.
- Leyasu has not been involved in any revert war with me. As to the revertions you cite, these were clearly well intended revertions of perceived vandalism. (It is unfortunately that Leyasu uses adolescent emotional macho language, but I don't see that in itself as a reason for banning him. In the contrary, if you compare [1] with its reversion [2], it is Deltabeignet who wrote the more inappropriate and misleading edit summary.) — Sebastian 18:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- There is no "dispute between Deltabeignet and SebastianHelm". Deltabeignet admitted to having disrupted Wikipedia for three months, and all I did was to bring it to the attention of the authorities. Please apply
- On the articles about rapcore, Limp Bizkit and Fred Durst, a certain LUCPOL was much more lucky. Moreover, if Leyasu used "adm language", Lucpol's problem was his broken English (but I finally agreed with him). --Baxtaba 21:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)]
- On the articles about
- Now those questions are over. I've reached some compromises with Lucpol about the positions of the words "nu metal" and "rapcore", and some admins have helped us to correct that articles in order to eschew edit wars. They were only grammar and genre importance problems, but much less dangerous than yours as so as I can see. --Baxtaba 22:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Carol Banawa
Thanks so much for helping me through the process. I'm just new here. It's a good thing you helped me. About Carol, I don't think she's planning further releases since she's already in the States.
Thanks again, --Slickdeejay (Talk) 21:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Deltabeignet
There is an ongoing discussion on User_talk:Deltabeignet#WP:RFAR.23Deltabeignet, which you may find interesting.
I also have a minor request: Could you please change "dispute between Deltabeignet and SebastianHelm" (in
Category:African American basketball players nominated for CfD
Hello there,
I noticed your note on the category in question. Agreeing with it wholeheartedly, I nominated it for deletion. If you would like to voice your opinion on it, you can go [3] there.--
DYK
Not a problem at all. I had many such mishaps in the past myself. Thanks for your work. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ——
Ah, I switched it to {{indefblockeduser}}. How's that? Khoikhoi 05:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Also see what I've made at User:Khoikhoi/Edipedia. :-) Khoikhoi 05:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you unprotect User:Yepre? I wanted to change the tag from "suspected sockpuppet" to "sockpuppet". Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Christian Metal Project
If you are interested in joining a potential Project Wiki Christian Metal project go here to sign up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Christian_Metal --E tac 08:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
project page:
Your block of Deathrocker
Deltabeignet arbitration
Thanks for commenting on some of my Workshop proposals in the case involving Deltabeignet. I appreciated your additions as well.
(FYI, when agreeing with another person's proposal, I think the usual procedure is to put "Endorse" (or, contrarily, "Oppose") before signing. Not that it's worth going back and changing in this case, which looks like it's maybe about to wrap up.)
Regards and Happy New Year. Newyorkbrad 05:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on
Nominate school for AfD?
Hello, I see you've written an essay on your user page about school notability. I've nominated dozens of articles for AfD, but I try to avoid it if I think it won't succeed. So here's an unclear case:
- Thanks. I checked the list of school deletions that you gave me. Interestingly, the last two months had a preponderance of deletions for middle schools (Ctrl-F for "middle"), but there were a lot of keeps before that. For now, I'll leave it alone. Note that Bonita Vista Middle School is in the same boat as Eastlake. YechielMan 19:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)]
DYK
--Yomanganitalk 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
That information was reported by several local news sources in the Las Vegas area. I have not heard anything differently as of 930 pm tonight.
link add request
dude (or dudette) you may recall me wanting to add links for a web site i'm affiliated with in the wikipedia section for the Chicago Bulls. you denied me at that time, it was a good few months ago.
however if you look at this site you'll notice we're rated the #1 basketball site around:
http://www.top100basketballsites.com/in.php?site=202
i'd appreciate you adding www.ebsports.net to your 'NBA' page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association
many thanks
gregorius77 (posted at 10pm GMT on 2/4/06)
Disambiguation for Brian Roberts on Ryan Roberts article
This isn't necessary. The names are considerably different. -- KirinX 00:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
someone
im not changing anything, and i guess someone else is doing it cuz u said i made changes that were ruining other ppl's work. maybe similar ip? —The preceding
Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 01:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Yo!
Lake Charles Guy here! BeaverWithChainsaw 18:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Lists should be categories
Since you are an administrator, I thought I would ask you if there is a policy or guideline that states lists should be deleted in favor of categorizing their contents?
Hi, I have a question
I'm not ready for the commitment of a username. I kind of like being an anonymous contributer. Sometime, I'm sure I'll come around. In the meantime, I want to find out who else has been making edits with my IP. I don't want my IP banned. You warned my IP about some edits to Pat Robertson, Minnesota and some other articles. I would like to see what edits were made. Is there a way to do this? Could you leave a response on the talk page for my IP? Thank you.
-Abe 8/12/07 1:07 pm Central
Amusement park project importance assessment
Hi, I am trying to get some feedback about the importance assessment of articles in the Amusement Park project, here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Assessment. Any thoughts? --Tinned Elk 20:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject roller coasters
Hi there, just to let you know that
WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, December 2007
The Roller Coaster WikiProject Newsletter
|
---|
Welcome to the new WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter! Until now, in spite of a decent number of members signed up to the WikiProject, we have had no regular progress updates or information as to how much of a difference our contributions are making. This monthly newsletter aims to provide an overview of all the work that is being done behind the scenes and to celebrate the successes that would otherwise pass by unseen. Any suggestions for future additions and general help with the newsletter will be greatly appreciated. |
As can be seen on the The vast majority of articles are currently assessed as stubs, which is probably to be expected as many contain an infobox and nothing else. Getting these up to start-class is incredibly easy, many simply need references and tidying up. Even if you have very little knowledge on the article subject, this task should be fairly straightforward and is the first step in raising overall article quality. The following articles reached B-class quality during November: |
The Amusement Park Portal is now automatically linked to from the roller coaster infoboxes. It's important to remember that we need to integrate our articles with those covered by the Amusement Park WikiProject. When working on a roller coaster article, it's always a good idea to ensure that there is a wikilink from the relevant amusement park article, otherwise no-one will even know the article exists! |
During November the WikiProject was joined by 3 new members, bringing the total number up to 49. The |
Just to get the idea out there, I'd like to propose a monthly article drive. With the poor state of most of the articles, it's unreasonable to suggest even a GA-drive, so a B-class drive would be more realistic. Any suggestions for January's article can be brought up on the |
Thanks for reading, any feedback would be hugely appreciated! Have a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! |
Delivered 12th December, 2007 by
WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, January 2008
The Roller Coaster WikiProject Newsletter
|
---|
Welcome!
Welcome to the second WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter! December has seen some real progress in terms of bringing up the quality of roller coaster related articles on Wikipedia. Assessment and tagging of articles is almost completely done and efforts are now being focussed on quality and improving articles. This month also sees the start of the new B-class drive, a brilliant way to get involved with the WikiProject and achieve something together. |
Articles and Assessment
As far as assessment goes, the backlog from last month was cleared almost immediately after the last newsletter went out, almost single-handedly by
assessment page that shows we are slowly dragging up the quality of the articles covered by the WikiProject.
The following articles reached B-class quality during December: |
Amusement Parks Portal
The |
Membership News
During December the WikiProject was joined by 2 new members, bringing the total number up to 49 after 2 inactive users were removed from the member list. The |
B-class Drive
This month's B-class Drive: Arrow Dynamics
So here is the first article improvement drive for the WikiProject, Arrow Dynamics. There isn't a huge amount that needs doing apart from the addition of references, formatting and a copyedit. For any outstanding contributions there are barnstars available which can be given to and by anyone! Any suggestions for February's B-class Drive can be brought up on thetalk page , so if there's a particular article you feel could benefit from more input then feel free to suggest it. |
...and finally...
Once again, thanks for reading! As always suggestions and offers of help are much appreciated. |
Seaserpent85 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
--Wizardman 05:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, February 2008
The Roller Coaster WikiProject Newsletter
|
---|
The
Issue III - February 2008
Got any suggestions? - Add them |
Welcome!
Welcome to the WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter! January has seen a number of milestones being passed in the WikiProject. We've achieved our first |
Articles and Assessment
We hit a milestone in January with our first The following articles reached GA-class or B-class quality during January: |
Membership News
During January the WikiProject was joined by 6 new members, bringing the total number up to 55. A very warm welcome to
to do list continues to serve as a place for flagging up articles in need of attention, review or comments.
A discussion is taking place regarding the best way to organise information about roller coaster records and the history of roller coasters. All members' opinions are welcomed; the discussion can be found here . |
Article Improvement Drive
This month's Article Improvement Drive: Roller coaster
Why not start at the top?! The main article is already at B class and, with a little help, isn't too far away from GA class. Please see the collaboration page for further information.
Any suggestions for March's Article Improvement Drive can be brought up on the talk page , so if there's a particular article you feel could benefit from more input then feel free to suggest it. |
...and finally... Once again, thanks for reading! As always suggestions and offers of help are much appreciated. |
Seaserpent85 20:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of ThouShaltNot
A
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.
You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- Mark Mulder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Amusement Park WikiProject
Hello Idont Havaname. Recently, the
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
URGENT DELETION MESSAGE
DEAR ADMINISTRATOR,
I request that my account be deleted with immediate effect, and that all my edits in the past, and past edit histories, be permanently removed from public viewing. Deletion of my account, City of Lukington, would be immensely appreciated.
I hope that this reaches you soon and that you are able to act upon my request.
Yours sincerely, Unknown user (formerly City of Lukington) — Preceding unsigned comment added by City of Lukington (talk • contribs) 20:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments
Nomination of Transracial for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transracial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transracial (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Nomination of The Deadlines for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Deadlines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deadlines until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feedback 00:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)