User talk:Tadeusz Nowak

Hello, Tadeusz Nowak! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 09:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mads Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nassau (region)

added links pointing to Orange-Nassau, Höchst, Rüdesheim and Herborn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duchy of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange-Nassau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently moved the article German Army (1935-45) to

. The reason you gave was that the German Army of World War II was demobilized only in 1946. The source you cited in the article refers to a formation of the military police disbanded in 1946.

I should like to ask you to undo your move, as the

have both ruled in the 1950s that the German Wehrmacht, and all it constituent parts, have ceased to exist after 8 May 1945. Furthermore, the CC ruled that the Proclamation No.2, Directive 18 and Law No. 34 of the Allied Control Commission were merely declaratory in character. So under German law, which should apply in this case, 8 May 1945 marks the end of all German military forces.

ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 17:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As long as someone is a prisoner of war, they are actively serving military personnel, and since most prisoners of war were repatriated and demobilized only in 1946, and since a number of army functions continued to be active until that time, for example the military justice passing out sentences on soldiers while POWs for things like, being rude to an officer or not obeying orders, the army was certainly not disbanded on 8 May 1945. That's a laughable idea, and absolutely not how a surrender works under international law. An army can not per definition be "disbanded" as long as it still has (as it had until 1946) a vast number of actively serving military personnel under military jurisdiction who have not been demobilized. First when all personnel is demobilized, an army can be disbanded. Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure you have reliable sources supporting your view. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 06:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wehrmacht was only dissolved on 20 August 1946 by the Allied control council, after it had been demobilized from the summer of 1945 onwards and through 1946. (Large, David Clay (1996). Germans to the Front: West German Rearmament in the Adenauer Era, p. 25). This is of course also mentioned in the main Wehrmacht article. Until that date, it was active, with serving (conscripted and professional) military personnel wearing Army uniform and being under military Wehrmacht Army jurisdiction and military command. There was quite a lot of activity going on involving the Wehrmacht Army in the time after 8 May 1945. (It's impossible to demobilize an army with millions of soldiers stationed in multiple countries in just one day.) If it had been disbanded on 8 May 1945, the conscripted Army soldiers would by definition no longer be obliged to serve (not be under military command) and could not have been held as POWs under international law any longer; this was of course not the case at all. Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 08:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should be discussed in a more approbriate setting, like here. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you handled the discussion quite well. Great job! Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:German neo-Nazi Lutz Bachmann dressed as Adolf Hitler.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

1: The title of this image is not suitable for Wikipedia as the depicted person does not consider himself nor is he generally considered a "neo-nazi". (see WP:LIVING PERSONS)2: The copyright status of this file is unclear, as the source is a newspaper, altough the description page lacks information as to who is the original author and more importantly, whether their consent has been given to re-use this image.

Under the

, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

please use an edit summary for every edit

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Wuerzele (talk) 10:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries. Thank you! 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC) 12.180.133.18 (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To reiterate, please use edit summaries. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Müller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Lagerfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you think there's a 4chan trolling issue here and you have some evidence for it, I'd strongly suggest you drop a note at

]

I don't suspect any specific editors here on WP of being affiliated with 4chan, but it's pretty well known that the "transracial" neologism is pushed on 4chan, Reddit etc.[1] Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Frank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

File:Lutz Bachmann posing as Hitler.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lutz Bachmann posing as Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 04:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tadeusz. I wrote a detailed response to your edits on Talk:Melissa_Bachman#February_3_edits. I'll discuss most, and hopefully we can reach a compromise that will be acceptable to both of us. One I will be reverting outright per

]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben Building, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Frankfurt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When dealing with major articles such as Luftwaffe and German Air Force, please discuss moving the articles first on their talk pages, and wait for a consensus to move them. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was no consensus for splitting them in such a confusing and misleading way in the first place, or for using names that are far less common in English sources. --Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 03:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the titles were discussed several years ago, and the current titles were by consensus. Whether you agree with them or not, the correct decision was to propose the moves first, and build a new consensus first. - BilCat (talk) 04:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Names are a sore point here, you need to discuss first, then move. Failure to do so is usually construed as nonconstructive editing. I've reverted your moves and locked down the pages pending a discussion of the changed names. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion at

]

Clearly Buckshot06 means that you can appeal the block at your talk page not his! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]