User talk:Imarapaholic

That said, I appreciate your willingness to help sort things out now, thank you for that! The most helpful thing you can do is to go through all your edits (which luckily are not very many), and list here, on this page, any article where you copied material from your sources (if you want to list the sources you copied from too, that's also a help). We have tools to look for this kind of thing, but the person best able to identify any remaining problems is the person who created them.

You ask if what is needed is acknowledgement, in the article, of the source you've copied from. In short, no: for copyright material it doesn't matter how well you reference it, you can't copy it. However (this is just for future reference), if you happen to copy

Public Domain

– i.e., non-copyright – content (such as an official US Government publication, say), then you must provide attribution of the source.

If you have questions, ask away! I have this page watched, so I'll probably see anything you write here. If you want to attract my attention elsewhere, include {{u|Justlettersandnumbers}} in what you write. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand perfectly. Thank you. I'll look through my contributions and see if I can find more examples. In the mean time, can you please help get Enlightenment Capital's page back up?

The page will be dealt with – either re-written or deleted – in due course (theoretically within a week). Unfortunately there are a LOT more copyright violations than there are people to deal with them, so there's a serious backlog. My advice: don't hold your breath! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I hope all is well with you. I removed the copyright violations from the Enlightenment Capital page and rewrote the article on the temporary page, as instructed. Could you please reach out to a colleague or admin to review it? It'd be amazing to have it up for their holidays as I've discussed it with the founder. Kindly, Imarapaholic (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Talk:Enlightenment Capital/Temp, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a clear
  section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk

  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Enlightenment Capital, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be a clear
  section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk

  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Giphy Logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canva Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canva Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canva Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canva Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]