User talk:Iota 9

This user may have left Wikipedia. Iota 9 has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Notre Dame Regional

Hi Iota 9, I've noticed and appreciate your improvements to the Notre Dame Regional Secondary School article. I have no reason to not believe the alumni listed there are not correct now. Of course, with the open nature of a wiki, it is important to have independent proof of statements listed so I added the request for footnotes. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The recent edit you made to Joseph Burke (teacher) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JavierMC 19:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Edward English. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JavierMC 19:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Vincent's Hospitals

section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Matt (talk) 07:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Don't attack others and tell others to stop editing a page. You don't

єmarsee • Speak up! 02:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

єmarsee • Speak up! 05:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Look, I don't want to edit over over this. If you are open to discussion regarding this, post a message on my talk page. If you refuse to discuss this matter and continue to edit war over this, I will have no choice but to pursue further action.

єmarsee • Speak up! 05:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't want to get into an editing war either. But right now I am upset that you have removed big chucks of information with out good reasons. Let me see if I understand you... If I'm a police officer, I shouldn't write articles on crime?? Or if I'm an architect, I shouln't write or edit aticles on buildings. Why?? because it conflicts??? What better way to get expert oppinion then to deal with people that are involved with the subject. Is that your best argument... Iota 9 (talk) 06:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's the point, if you are related to whatever you are writing, chances are you are going to have a biased view. Wikipedia maintains a neutral, non-promotive atmosphere on all articles. These chunks of informations are largely cruft. Irrelevant information that doesn't help the reader at all. The article wasn't up to the

єmarsee • Speak up! 06:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

It seems now that you are ignoring all of my other points I've made. If you can be reasonable and accept some of the changes, for the improvement of the article towards the MOS standards, then I would be fine with that. You don't seem to understand that unlike Usain Bolt or any athelete, a high school bridge building contest is not a 100 metre sprint at the Olympics. I don't care if it's withstood 3000 kgs, if it wasn't a world record of sorts, it's not notable and it's unencyclopedic. Plus the contest is only open to those who are enrolled in the school, that makes it even less notable. If it were some regional contest, it would be a lot more notable. If a person would be really interested in bridges, they would be searching "bridge" or other related on Wikipedia, not some random high school in Vancouver.

єmarsee • Speak up! 15:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File copyright problem with File:3D court layout (2-3 zone defense).jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

T • C • L) 16:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Go ahead and remove image... using other image instead Iota 9 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:2-3 Zone Defense - initial set up.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

T • C • L) 16:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Uploaded image with copyright of Public Domain Iota 9 (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:2-3 Zone Defense - initial set up.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

T • C • L) 22:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

NowCommons: File:Holy Rosery Alter 1.JPG

talk) 03:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Possibly unfree File:St. Ann's plaque5.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St. Ann's plaque5.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File copyright problem with File:St. Andrew's Cathedral 11.JPG

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:St. Ann's Academy3.JPG

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:2919 East 29th Avenue plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2919 East 29th Avenue plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please remove image as it the plaque with the wrong address.Iota 9 (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2919 East 29th Avenue plaque.JPG

section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357 ^talk 19:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:St. Mary's (Kerrisdale) plaque.JPG

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Mary's (Kerrisdale) plaque 2.JPG

Thank you for uploading this media,

However, it would be nice if you could give some kind of indication as to what license the media is under. That way other people can be confident in making use of it for many varied purposes :)

Adding license information also helps prevent media you've put effort into creating from being deleted :)

You may wish to read

Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators

which will assist you :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested...

I had Holy Cross Regional High School semi-protected, so it will be harder for people to vandalize it now. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 04:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Line defense - initial set up.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Line defense - initial set up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fly fastbreak.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fly fastbreak.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BC Catholic Basketball Championship

The article BC Catholic Basketball Championship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party courses to establish that this is a
notable event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CutOffTies (talk) 18:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:St. Andrew's Wesley Church plaque.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:St. Andrew's Wesley Church plaque.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:St. Andrew's Wesley Church plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St. Andrew's Wesley Church plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:2104 East 19th Avenue plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2104 East 19th Avenue plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:6120 McDonald St. plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:6120 McDonald St. plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:A.E. Tulk House Rosemary plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A.E. Tulk House Rosemary plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Anderson House plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anderson House plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bank of Montreal - Main & Prior Branch plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bank of Montreal - Main & Prior Branch plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Barcley Manor plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barcley Manor plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bay Theater (Vancouver) plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bay Theater (Vancouver) plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Brock House plaque.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brock House plaque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]