User talk:Itemirus

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Archive 1

Well in my opinion the INTRODUCTORY price is a needed information. It helps to recognize the development in the Market. My English is not that strong, so I hope this explanation is enough for you. So please let it there. --77.22.68.182 (talk) 07:13, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually new messages should be posted at the bottom of the page...besides that....what are you talking about?? are you sure you wrote on the right user's talk page? --Itemirus (talk) 09:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am an amateur artist, I always thought there'd be an category about the night topic but there doesn't seem to be one. I started it but couldn't find enough information to expand it, also the pictures in commons all seem to have copy right in America, I was frustrated. I think you can either delete it or maybe I ask for help from the project page? -- RexRowan  Talk  09:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reworded it a little bit and did a search from National Gallery website and got a list of paintings under this category, the link is here: [1]. Not sure if I can use them as references or links? Please advice. :D -- RexRowan  Talk  10:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After considering the deletion policy and merits of your rationale (

Could you please tell me why you think the article is written like an advertisement so I can improve it? Greetings. teammathi 11:23, 25 August 2012 (CET)

Hi. Thanks for patrolling new pages - a tedious but essential task! When you add a speedy notice to a talk page which previously did not exist, like

Hi JohnCD - yes, adding the welcome tag is polite. The problem is that the deletion notice is added automatically to the user's talk page by the PageTriage tool. So after patrolling, I would be required to manually check if the user is a new user and, if that's the case, add the welcome tag to his talk page...--Itemirus^{Message me!} 11:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. That seems a problem with the Page Triage system - I'll mention it there. It ought to be possible to do it automatically - the PROD template mechanism adds "firstarticle" in front of the PROD if it finds an empty page. I have been having a similar discussion about the AfC notices at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Welcome message for newbies. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - Page Triage is still in beta testing, i have also left a notice on the tool's

feedback page with some suggestions - maybe you should point this out as well ) --Itemirus^{Message me!} 11:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

		The Friendship Barnstar
		Nice to meet you. The transition from "mess" to acceptable article went well. That was fun! ```Buster Seven Talk 13:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you too :) --Itemirus^{Message me!} 14:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itemirus,

here you tagged the article Daiwon Digital Broadcasting for needing copy editing but I cannot immediately see what is wrong. If you tell me what mistakes there are, then I am happy to correct them. Regarding the article being an orphan, I will check what articles can have a link to the page.

Regards,

-- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was probably an error I made with the PageTriage tool. I removed it --Itemirus^{Message me!} 13:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello you made a mistake because this is WIKIPEDIA you can change anything! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre is the best (talk • contribs) 23:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Yaris678 (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i do not believe it is unconstructive. if the article can throw baseless scenario about other country invading, why the double standard to suggest US is "mightier than thou" and will not possibly invade other country for it's self interest either? the message is left in protest for the double standard this site has that demonized other country will censoring similiar scenario about western country, and based on the fact that US has been most involve in the past 10 wars on the planet, i believe my scenario is far more realistic if we allow opinionated piece against certain country like the ones we seen RIMPAC. as a country that is taking part in RIMPAC, i disagree with the assertion made against those country as it carries the impression that our country support this position when it doesn't. if you want to remove that, then i will remove all negative references as well. do you agree that fair? 222.165.85.109 (talk) 07:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I might in principle partially agree with your ideas, all Wikipedia articles must mantain a

talk page; I'm desperate for human contact. --Itemirus^{Message me!} 07:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

JoeyZasa11 (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 19:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi, Do not delete that page actually I'm working on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashikalasalunkhe (talk • contribs) 07:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just nominated it for copyright infringement - the deletion process does not depend on me --Itemirus (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1983–84 Los Angeles Lakers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byron Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You have new messages at WilliamH's talk page.
Message added 13:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WilliamH (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itermirus! I stalk WilliamH's and Dennis's talk page and saw that you are aiming to run for adminship. Here are the observations that I've made. You say that you are on wikipedia since 6 years but to the matter of fact, you've been actively editing for merely 5 months. This is way to low for anyone to pass an RFA ever. As far as my knowledge goes, no RFA candidate with less then 6 month experience has passed the process since 2006 and no editor with less then 8 months experience since 2010. As the community is expanding, so are the standards of it and this has resulted in the voters at RFA, expecting much better profile then what is yours currently. I'm sorry but it is highly unlikely for you to pass right now. You've again been editing after a long gap of an year or some so anyone will consider your recent experience of just 2 months which is much lower then what is expected. The reason is that 2 months of recent editing or 5 months of editing in 6 years give us not much clue about your abilities, attitude, work in admin related areas, how you'd deal with conflicts and your way of editing and understanding of policies. Usually, constant editing of about 10 or 12 months is must now, keeping the condition that the editing is clean and the editor is not troublesome and is a good content creator. I have no intentions whatsoever to discourage you but I'm just alerting that if you run now, it'll fail. It is really tough for editors like me to oppose any candidate and I'd only oppose if the editor is problemetic or new or un-experienced and I'd oppose your stand now. If you ask Dennis, I believe that he'll be giving a similar reply and would advise to get more experience and so do I. Your editing has been great of late but if you run with your editing getting re-started in 2 months, it can be assumed that you just need admin rights and some editors would also suspect your intentions. I don't want to badger or discourage but I'd like to advise to not to run for at least 6 or 8 more months. You can also find this important: Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates. If there are any doubts, you can ask. Cheers! TheSpecialUser ^TSU 14:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get I've been editing for merely five months?? Check my stats - Moreover , it's not me saying I've been editing on Wikipedia for 6 years; that's an auto-updating userbox that gets data from the server; actually you are the one who has been editing for just four months, or at least so it is stated here. I know about the edit count bias, but that's just a bias - the official Wikipedia rules do not say anything about the minimum number of edits to be eligible for adminship. Anyway thank you for your kind reply and keep the good work going. --Itemirus (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a cursory read to your message - now I've read it again and I get your point. I've been away for quite a while (my wife got pregnant in 2011) and up until last July I've been quite busy. I missed the constant editing of about 10 months part; if that's the case, an amendment to the requirements for adminship is warranted. --Itemirus (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are no set requirements to amend. To change that, you'd have to change the minds of the many, many people who vote at RfA's. TheSpechialUser was not citing a set list of requirements, but experience from past RfA's. By the way, I envy you living in Como. I've been there, and it's a beautiful place. ~

talk) 18:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Como used to be a very nice city - now it has become somewhat decadent. Many of the lakeside towns are pearls indeed.--Itemirus (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the barnstar and I'm really sorry, I could not get back to you as I went to bed immediately after leaving this message. I've been !voting at RFAs since some time and even nominated an editor who succeeded. When I said that you've been editing for merely 5 months, I meant actively five months and that is what dozens of people oppose at RFAs unfortunately. My apologies for not being clear, and Como! I envy too. I love that city though I've never been there. One of my cousins had visited it and she used to describe it nicely + I googled and it is indeed great TheSpecialUser ^TSU 22:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's lame but it's really all I have to live for. By harassing other people I feel like I actually have some human relationships. Sometimes I pretend that what I do here is important, like I'm contributing something to the the world . . . Please let me keep my illusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.161.114 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You placed a BLPProd tag on Ehsanullah Shafiq. The article had a reference, therefore you cannot add a BLPProd tag. Also, the unreferenced tag is also unnecessary. A BLP sources tag would be more appropriate. Bgwhite (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The article uses as only source a website directly affiliated with the person; this is not acceptable per
  claim notability or to advertise.--Itemirus (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Per
  WP:BLPPROD, "To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography." (emphasis no mine) Use the instructions for the tag not various other rules that don't apply to the specific tag. Bgwhite (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Don't you agree this rule is confusing? The BLPPROD procedure states that the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a * reliable source * ; if WP:SELFPUB states that Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves so long as (5) the article is not based primarily on such sources then I assume that an article relying only on such a source is to be considered unsourced, hence the BLPPROD tag. What is your opinion on this issue? --Itemirus (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• It is confusing, counter-intuitive and creates one big loophole. I have to tell editors about this issue about 2-3 times a week. Any ref is ok to not apply the tag, but to remove it a reliable ref has to be applied. I mostly see this with articles that only have an IMDb ref. IMDb is unreliable. There is the {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} tag for this reason. This issue was last argued last summer and the rule stayed the same. I personally favor closing this loophole. Bgwhite (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok thank you for your clarification. I wonder what is my best option if I review a new BLP with just one self-published source written in Arab or Cantonese O_o --Itemirus (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• What? You don't know Cantonese or Arabic and you call yourself a Wikipedian. Shameful. I personally know a few languages... bad English and really bad English. Bgwhite (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You have new messages at Wikipedia Talk:Rollback.
Message added 06:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Anderson - What's up? 06:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You have new messages at Wikipedia Talk:Rollback.
Message added 07:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply Anderson - What's up? 07:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you change your mind? :D --Itemirus (talk) 23:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You have new messages at Talk:Sergei Ovchinnikov (volleyball).
Message added 00:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Daniel (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I recently edited a page that contained erroneous and defamatory material about me. You restored it. I will be turning the matter over over to my attorneys.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.3.41 (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The deliberate removal of content from a page, without any edit summary and without leaving comments on the talk page, is considered vandalism and is reverted. If you have problems with an article about you, you should identify yourself and request admin intervention --Itemirus (talk) 05:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. Just plain wrong. As I have pointed out at

WP:BLP, and as such anyone could and should have removed it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for flagging this problem,

I declined your request at the vandalism noticeboard since that's primarily for simple, block-now vandalism. This one is a bit more complex and may require protecting deleted pages, etc., so I suggest you report it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for a closer look and a more thorough fix.

Once again, thanks for watching out for our encyclopaedia! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)}

Aye aye, sir! I'll keep a watchful eye on that bogey, in case he tries to penetrate our defenses again! --Itemirus (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The instructions on the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annalisa Minetti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athlete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see:

• Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#User:Lucky102 && Talk:Milan/GA1

The "review" at Talk:Milan/GA1 is lame; any article deserves better. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed – well done Rabbit--Itemirus (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I suggested that Townsend review it; he's a regular GA reviewer and is thorough. Also hinted at Mally. Good luck. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 12:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nb: I just looked at your user page; the technique of positioning content over the image with the <div> tags is originally my work. It's been copied many times. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to you then ) Actually I copied the layout from another page ;-) --Itemirus (talk) 14:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Itemirus. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using

Hey I'm very impressed by Wikipedia's / your detection of vandalism to the Cellular Confinement (geocells) article and its reversion back to the original version. Kudos to Wikipedia tools and on-the-ball editors like you. YSchary (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you )--Itemirus (talk) 12:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been long since I saw your name around. Like previously, I think you are taking a break and I hope you'll be enjoying it. I hope that you'll come back soon and help us around. Till then, you are certainly missed and enjoy the break :) TheSpecialUser TSU 15:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) very tasty --Itemirus (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:40, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! When using certain templates on talk pages, such as welcome templates and user warnings, don't forget to

may be sufficient, I can remove the tag on Roberto Procaccini? Thanks--Nevida (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nevida, I am not the custodian of the article! If you have some remarks about the article, just write in its talk page. Anyway I think it is ok now.--Itemirus (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Knapp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Knapp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Versus IO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tablet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giovanni Felice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maltese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Itemirus. Thanks for your note. As you point out, the tag does indeed seem a bit out of place, but after having marked the page as patrolled, I wanted to draw attention to the existing references (one of which included the non-standard "See more at: ...", and the other, which is pretty promotional: "Costa Diadema, all round excitement") and none of the other Twinkle tags seemed to fit. You're welcome to remove it once you've tweaked those refs a bit. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 22:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pickiness is relative, and although Wikipedia articles are essentially ongoing projects, one aspires to perfection... I'm sure you'll agree with me that your new version is/looks better than the previous one. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 09:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companies paying scrip dividends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Grid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, "This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information" on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Nicholas_Myers article. Can you please point me at the specific wording you mean, so I can fix it?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfulbright (talk • contribs) 21:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe that template is excessive; anyway I've got the impression that the article is written just to promote the subject with a long list of accomplishments; I have no doubt Prof. Myers is a highly reputable doctor, but the contents of the article may not thoroughly adhere to wikipedia policies in regards to

• While serving in that leadership position he dramatically increased the size and quality of the school’s department of otolaryngology, so that it is widely considered one of the leading programs in the world. - the cited source does not contain any clues in regard;
• He’s been honored to deliver over 50 eponymous addresses - should be referenced;

--Itemirus (talk)  22:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added references/citations wherever you specificied the need, in addition to other places that seemed to me to call out for it. I added more categories. I deleted the word "dramatically" and tried to change any wording that was subjective opinion. With one exception: there is a line in there that the UPMC department is considered one of the leading such departments, and I included a citation to a source that makes that statement.

The two remaining dings on the article are 1) citations needed, and 2) subjective promotion. I'm hoping I've addressed those. Assuming you agree, can you please remove those two exceptions from the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfulbright (talk • contribs) 23:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done and I've improved the page structure a bit; remember to

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Hi! Would you like to check the English used here? And the correspondance between italian and english sentences? Thank you in advance! --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 23:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being late - everything seems perfectly translated to me :-) --Itemirus (talk) 13:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so match! :) --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 14:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Ciao Itemirus!

According to the Wikimedia Embassy in Meta, I see you are the ambassador for Italian Wikipedia, for which I contact you as a representative of this community. As you may know, we are currently discussing an amendment to our Terms of use (Condizioni d'uso). At the Wikimedia Foundation, we would love to have the participation of the Italian Wikipedia Community in the ongoing discussion taking place in Meta Wiki.

Wikimedia Foundation's team in the discussion is open and available in any moment to respond to any doubt or comment that you or any other user may have about this topic. Although the discussion is taking place mainly in English, please rest assured that comments in other languages are more than welcome in the main discussion. We really hope that contributors in projects in different languages actively participate in their own language. I want to invite you to participate (in Italian if you prefer) in the discussion taking place.

We hope you encourage other Italian community members to participate!

See you in Meta!

--JVargas (WMF) (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be helpful to have a practical way for users to point out any discrepancies in information. It would be useful to have an easy-to-post question forum, too.

For instance, on one page (longest mountain ranges) it states the Himalayas length is 2576 km, and on the Himalaya page it states 2400 km. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stjohn1970 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Knapp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Knapp (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itemirus! I've proposed merging an article you started,

Sorry I reverted your edit it. It was a good edit. I reverted it again! Sander.v.Ginkel ^{(Je suis Charlie)} 23:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We are from the Inside Out Project and we are trying to translate the page in different languages and we are having minor problems with the italian page. It was deleted today and we cannot edit anymore. We tried today and weren't able to! Thank you! Also, our wikipedia account insideoutproject got blocked so we had to create this one... Could you help us with this?

The Inside Out Project Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminabs2601 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

good morning Itermirus,

I need you help urgently, i develop for long year and long research the page Lierna, an amazing village. The page was completly destroy and ereased without a real reason. All the content was true and I used a lot of references and bibliography. Please did you can check the history of LIERNA page? and check these? and said something against these vandalism? Thank you, --Alec Smithson (talk) 14:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've already answered this on their talk page, though if you wish to weigh in at Talk:Lierna you are welcome to. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

Proposed deletion of List of companies paying monthly dividends

The article List of companies paying monthly dividends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear why this would be a notable, defining characteristic for a stand alone list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Itemirus! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

Hello, Itemirus. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blink Charging is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blink Charging until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Qiwi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

has never had evidence of notability, no RSes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on PartnerRe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ToeFungii (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're mistaken on all counts. We use templates in order to standardise warnings to users. I checked the article and it said, without any independent references to back up the statement, "It is one of the world's leading reinsurers". That's advertising. Someone as experienced as you should know that and should understand the rules on speedy deletion. Deb (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farmmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farmmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farmmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farmmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Itemirus, I hope you are doing well. I wonder if we can contact via email or WhatsApp to discuss the possibility of making a workshop in Italy to provide Wikipedia training to a group of students in Italy. waiting to hear from you. Anassjerjawi (talk) 10:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

There are ample, independent sources, including Yahoo finance. Your removal has been done arbitrarily on no reasonable grounds. Please return the article to the mainspace. Itemirus (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, Yahoo finance is from Safuu themselves and it's a press release- literally identical to the globalpresswire citation. CUPIDICAE💕 21:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Safuu instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to have been move to mainspace by the creator.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Safuu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Safuu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itemirus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Safuu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NCRYPTO

, cannot find any non-crypto publications talking about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusalkii (talk) 03:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Safuu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Safuu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safuu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—

talk) 04:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Safuu Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Safuu Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Safuu

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 12:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

CS1 error on Como

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Como, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 07:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Notice

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to read

wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 17:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You've been indulged enough. An article's talk page is not a forum (read

WP:NOTAFORUM). Either start coming up with reliable sources for your proposed edits....or just give it a rest.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Deletion discussion about Gestione Governativa Navigazione Laghi

Hello Itemirus, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gestione Governativa Navigazione Laghi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gestione Governativa Navigazione Laghi.

Deletion

notability

, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First Digital USD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Digital USD, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. David Gerard (talk) 21:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

February 2024

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:First Digital USD. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. DMacks (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was pointing out that if a guy that has been deleting content on a whim for years on wikipedia is still allowed to do it regardless of rules and, adding insult to injury, is also an admin, probably there is something deeply wrong within Wikipedia's policies. I hope that, with same zeal and diligence, you will publish a warning on his user talk page for being such a problematic editor for years, wasting other people's time with his arbitrary and often reverted actions. Itemirus (talk) 10:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no acute behavior problem there.

WP:AN is that-a-way. DMacks (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually I reported him there; just a cursory look at his talk pages is emblematic of his questionable actions Itemirus (talk) 11:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the decision there was that he didn't edit war. It's a poor Admin that doesn't have complaints on their pages from poor editors. Doug Weller talk 10:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I said AN (Itemirus is claiming longterm or widespread general problems) not ANEW (where Itemirus was rightly rebuffed as not making a credible claim of edit-war-like behavior). DMacks (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for personal attacks here and here (the second attack was so crude that it has been revision deleted, not by me). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 10:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block length increased because of block-evasion. JBW (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Standard cryptocurrency notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

David Gerard (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply