User talk:Jackman69

Hello Jackman69! sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- —Centrx→talk • 21:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

—Centrx→talk • 21:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to discuss with you the POV problems on Jonathan Avildsen. You keep reverting my edits, which I believe make the article less POV-ed. Here are some examples of what I believe to be POV.

Clearly, Jonathan's role as Snake in

The Karate Kid, Part III

marked the pinnacle of his career.

As the cackling flunkie to "Karate's Bad Boy" Mike Barnes, Jonathan brought a vitality to the role of Snake that would have been regarded as that film's premier performance had it not been for Thomas Ian Griffith's Brando-like turn as Cobra Kai kingpin, Terry Silver.

Who amongst us can forget the dashing figure Jonathan cut in his canary yellow Cobra Kai t-shirt? Tales abound of theater-going women struck with the vapors as Jonathan terrorized a trembling Ralph Macchio (as Daniel Larusso), while nation-wide, envious males copied Snake's leather jackets and Chia Pet hairstyle.

Like other famous cinematic utterances, such as "I'll be back," and "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!" Jonathan's catch phrase, "You know it!" from his role as Snake, has a permanent place in the American lexicon.

None of these statements are sourced and represent a neutral point of view. Please read

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to

don't talk|_email] 01:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Geni 01:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackman69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Decline reason:

standard vandalism block. Come back in 31 hours. Sasquatch t

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Tyrenius 20:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

If you get unblocked and decide to return, I have left a question for you here. In the mean time, I shall revert your edit as vandalism. Jibbles | Talk 20:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reason for unblocking. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 21:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]