User talk:Jcejhay
Welcome!
|
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jcejhay. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jcejhay. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Jcejhay. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Some falafel for you!
You are an awesome editor! Hcethatsme (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC) |
FYI
Hello J. Regarding your edit summary I wanted to let you know that some of the line is used in a scene from act one between Mrs Cheveley and Robert Chiltern. At one point Mrs C says ..."Sooner or later we have all to pay for what we do. You have to pay now. Before I leave you to-night, you have got to promise me to suppress your report, and to speak in the House in favour of this scheme" I hasten to add that I think your edit was correct. Whoever added that line was using
- Hi, MarnetteD. Thank you for all this! Before making the edit, I did search the Gutenberg text for pieces of that line and somehow didn't find it (while I did find the other line). But this isn't the first time Gutenberg's text search has let me down, so I'm definitely going to be on my guard for that in future. Jcejhay (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Re: Susquehanna County demographic data
Hello, did you see
Flagg Please tell me where you see Gunn's signature as you allege here. I'm seeing the signature of JMF at lower right, below where the woman's dress meets the floor.
Ewulp (talk) 00:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
April 2023
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Philip Wylie without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donald Albury 15:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- My mistake, I misread the watchlist. My apologies for the reversion and for placing this notice. - Donald Albury 19:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the Thanks
I've been given gentle corrections before, but nothing is as nice as getting a compliment. Thank you! MissMaryMack14 MissMaryMack14 (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- My pleasure! As you and I know, catching and fixing those unreflectively sexist treatments of women's names is so very important. Jcejhay (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Revisions to give more and better background for Weird Barbie
Hi, Jcejhay, although your idea is good, a complete paragraph to Weird Barbie and other discontinued dolls' background is too long, especially if a later part of the plot contains that the Barbies' societal system was wrong and mistreated these dolls. It's not a crucial part of the plot to justify the discontinued dolls' predicament in an earlier paragraph. Let's just stick to the main course of the plot. Thank you for your understanding. Ertonien (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Ertonien, Jcejhay and I have had extensive conversation about the edit you unilaterally reverted, which explicitly said: see talk page. Would appreciate it muchly if you'd go there and engage as you should have in the first place. Thanks. Xan747 ✈️ 🧑✈️ 19:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Xan747, first of all, sorry that I didn't respond to your request in the first place. I understand that there are certain matters that needs to be discussed among editors, and yes, every editor has the same right to highlight something in the article if they want to. But it does matter how these affect the structure of the plot. I noticed sometimes editors use clauses that just repeat the meaning of an already written main clause with synonyms. They even ignore the warning that is placed at the top of the plot section. Of course, you're right, these kind of issues needs to be discussed in the talking section, so I'll try to pay more attention to that in the future instead of just reverting things without explanation. Ertonien (talk) 17:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review