User talk:Jgleissn

Alcoholism and slavery

The content you added is probably best at slavery but is a little too detailed for alcoholism.

talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

I strongly disagree:

Slaves were the great victims of alcoholism. Those subjected to abuse by alcoholics need a voice. In terms of reliability, comments made by multiple former slaves, including the most famous former slave, abolitionist Frederick Douglass, rank very high, especially when their views are highly consistent with each other and modern research. The power disparities of slavery created what might be considered laboratory conditions to study alcoholism in the historical and scientific contexts. That power disparity was highlighted again by Joseph Stalin, probably the most abusive alcoholic of all time, although those unversed in the disease of alcoholism fail to grasp the unmistakable characteristics of this infamous abusive alcoholic.

The edited comments were properly placed in the "History" sub-section and added American and world historical perspective to go with the German, Swedish, Greek and ancient examples. All the citations can be verified through a Library of Congress website containing the Federal Writers' Project Slave Narratives; docsouth at the University of North Carolina; or other cited publications.

Editing to the article "Alcoholism" ought to first eliminate junk science, things such as (1) the reference to "peyote" (!!) as a cure for alcoholism, (2) repeated pharmacological references that pale in significance compared to the proven yet article-neglected role of A.A. in "managing" alcoholism, (3) failure to differentiate alcohol use between southern and northern European cultures ("Alcohol consumption is relatively similar between many European cultures," (4) the restriction under "Research" to only the failed pharmacological approach as opposed to more important social psychological, legal and cultural forces and research; and I could go on and on.....

John Dewar Gleissner, Esquire — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.249.240 (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jgleissn, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a

neutral

and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately

usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username

or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
if you wish)

Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Coffeepusher (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Jgleissn, I noticed that a majority of your edits involve highlighting the same authors work and it appears that you may have a conflict of interest. Please review wikipedia's

WP:COPYVIO to better understand our policies. Thank you and good luck editing.Coffeepusher (talk) 01:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jgleissn, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to

suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism

issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
, for how to cite sources here.

Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
Wikipedia:Copy-paste
.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MER-C 18:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]