User talk:Jimmyg1982

I re-removed the Arlis Perry subsection from

Jack the Ripper happened in Whitechapel. I bet ya there is something in the whitechapel article that mentions it. I believe the murder is a significant piece of the history of the church. it is definitly more important than what kind of organs they have. you might not think that the satanic ritual murder of a woman on the floor of a church is that important, but i think that if someone wants info on the church, they are going to find the info on Arlis Perry more interseting than the type of organs the church uses. Also London is one of the largest and most important cities in the world. You aren't going to have every murder that happened be on the London page. Stanford Memorial Church is a large church on a major college campus. Theres only been one murder in the church, it should be on the page...

thanks jimmy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmyg1982 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good call(s)! However there is a small difference between those two articles: The Whitechapel includes a single line mentioning the murders, not an entire paragraph . Of course the murder is significant in the church history, but keep in mind that the article is about the

Arlis Perry

article.

Just see it like this: If someone wants to read more about the murder they will simply navigate to the article, where a full explanation can be found. But keeping an entire section in would be the same as adding a section about marriage into the article: While it is related (Church <-> Margiage) i think you will agree with me that simply linking wedding is enough, as opposed to adding a summary of what a wedding is. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 21:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy, I'm glad this little article inspired you to create an account, but you are dangerously close to breaching

3RR. I recommend that you step away for at least a day. When you come back, I also recommend that you take Excirial's suggestions. I agree that the information about Perry is both interesting and necessary, but you don't state why and you don't cite any sources. Actually, one of the article's weakness (just one out of many) is that it lacks inline sources, which is why I added the tag. (I also made a few improvements, which includes using Excirial's ideas and putting the line about Perry in a more appropriate place.) This article needs a lot of work, so here's my third recommendation: instead of involving yourself in an edit war, make better use of your valuable time and work on improving the article. I'm working on some other projects at the current time, or I'd take it on myself. Maybe I will, later on. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I have nominated The Death Dealers Manual, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Death Dealers Manual. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pichpich (talk) 22:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your submission in

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also,

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Damn Quails, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request

Hello Jimmyg1982. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Damn Quails.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Damn Quails}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.