User talk:Jmills16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Jmills16!
ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

August 2016

Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Heavy Object, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zerotalk 16:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 01:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 02:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2016

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at No-Rin. —Farix (t | c) 20:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmills16 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't know the rules

Decline reason:

You were given multiple warnings, above, telling you the rules, including "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2016

original research, I believe that an immediate Level 4 warning is appropriate in this matter. —Farix (t | c) 15:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When I see this edit, I see someone who doesn't care about
Wikipedia Adventure to learn how to cite sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Just to be absolutely clear...

  • "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required
    .
  • Always cite a source for any new information
    . When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
  • We do not publish original thought nor original research
    .
  • Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well
    .
  • Reliable sources typically include
    : articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
  • Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view
    . Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Links to that information were presented in previous messages, but now that it's here, you have absolutely no excuse (not that you did before). Again: if you are going to add any new information, you must cite a source. If you see a note reminding you to not use your own interpretation, do not just delete it and stick in your own personal interpretation.

As I said before,

The Wikipedia Adventure. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jmills16. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 14:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

June 2018

Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

July 2018

reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 10:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 10:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Date A Live. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 21:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Date A Live. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —Farix (t | c) 21:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Jmills16. —Farix (t | c) 22:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Leave me alone Farix, you're a huge bully. I love Date a Live and it's one of my favorite harem animes, but you want to mark it as a Freaking Comedy that is utterly ridiculous. It has more depth than that, that's why I think the harem genre sums it up well for harems have drama, comedy, serious thought. Also it isn't science fiction it's science fantasy, you douche bag.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jmills16. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]