User talk:Jmills16
Welcome!
|
August 2016
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Heavy Object, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zerotalk 16:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
October 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at No-Rin. —Farix (t | c) 20:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Unblock
Jmills16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't know the rules
Decline reason:
You were given multiple warnings, above, telling you the rules, including "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
December 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)- When I see this edit, I see someone who doesn't care about Wikipedia Adventure to learn how to cite sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)]
Just to be absolutely clear...
- "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
- Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
- We do not publish original thought nor original research.
- Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
- Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
- Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
Links to that information were presented in previous messages, but now that it's here, you have absolutely no excuse (not that you did before). Again: if you are going to add any new information, you must cite a source. If you see a note reminding you to not use your own interpretation, do not just delete it and stick in your own personal interpretation.
As I said before,
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jmills16. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
June 2018
]
July 2018
]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Date A Live. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 21:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Date A Live. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —Farix (t | c) 21:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Jmills16. —Farix (t | c) 22:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Leave me alone Farix, you're a huge bully. I love Date a Live and it's one of my favorite harem animes, but you want to mark it as a Freaking Comedy that is utterly ridiculous. It has more depth than that, that's why I think the harem genre sums it up well for harems have drama, comedy, serious thought. Also it isn't science fiction it's science fantasy, you douche bag.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Jmills16. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)