User talk:Jonathan Hardin'

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
ja-0この利用者は日本語分かりません

Hey and welcome!

I'm sorry this Baseball1015 guy kinda ruined your first moments on Wikipedia, but here's a welcome message anyway :)

The edits you made looked good and promising, so please do continue and improve the articles you are interested in. It's also great that you've found your way to some of our WikiProject talk pages. They are great places to seek help if you need it.

I left the Baseball1015 guy a nice message and I hope he responds well.

User:Krator (t c) 14:50, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy XV

You may wish to contribute to the discussion here as the principal developer of the article; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy XV. Ottawa4ever (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your resource archive for FF

Do you happen to have any information I might've missed for the three original SaGa games?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry, I don't have anything for these. Akitoshi Kawazu and the SaGa series designers hosted a "Premium Fan Event" last year and talked about the history of the series, but I don't know how much of it was devoted to the first three games: [1] [2] [3] [4] Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 08:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I've just seen your edit on Kefka Palazzo. So you can read Japanese? Awesome :D I had little hope that someone actually could. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried the manual?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Clear Trolling Attempt"

You clearly have no idea what trolling means. I am not trolling, I was reverting hasty, uneducated edits. Kefka's full name is "Kefka Palazzo" in both regions, its just a bit more obscure in the English games. The Clawed One (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enix home computer games

Why did you copy the text from

Enix home computer games? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Erm, there's a little more on the page than just that paragraph, you know? :) Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 06:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copying text from an article without crediting where you got it from is a copyright violation. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enix home computer games, you may be blocked from editing. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Stop the copyright violating and I'll stop reverting you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 07:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another user has listed your article for speedy deletion. Don't remove the tag, use the holdon tag and explain why it should be here on the Talk page. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article,
Enix home computer games

speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Enix - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page
.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VQuakr (talk) 07:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Talkback

Hi Jonathon, and thanks for your recent reviews of video game FLCs. When you get the chance, can you cap your resolved concerns at the above FLC, and if posssible, state whether you support, oppose or are neutral toward the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you revisit again? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Video game list moves

Hey thanks for taking care of the moves for the video game list articles. It completely left my mind to go ahead and do it, my mistake. Nomader (Talk) 06:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FFXV

Jonathan, With regards to

WP:FAKEARTICLE ). The article cannot be stored indefinetaly. Can you note if the article will be improved in the near future to move into the main space and still address the concerns addressed at the previous deletion discussion? (The current article only has one additional sentance and appears very much like the same article that was deleted earlier). Thanks for your input and thoughts Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Seiken Densetsu

Hi! I saw you undid my edit on the Seiken Densetsu page. That's fine, the distinction between numbered video games and others is unnecessary in such a short list. What I don't understand are the grammar errors, because I didn't write anything new, just copied and pasted. I mean the note about Secret of Evermore: it's taken from that page, in order to make the reference symmetrical. By the way, please tell me the grammar errors so that I will avoid them in the future.

Wow, you criticized my edit about not just one, but three points! I've never been so bad in Wikipedia before :-D --Abacos (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! For example each section heading take one capital letter on Wikipedia ("Creation and design" instead of "Creation and Design"). Also sorry if I sound too "to the point"; I'm not that mean :) Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nier

Which guideline are you referring to? [5] The applicable guideline at

WP:VG/JP flatly states that games with English/transliterated titles do not warrant Japanese transliteration. Ham Pastrami (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

FFXII Ultimania scans

Can you repost all the scans you had from all the different FFXII Ultimania?

I've found somebody willing to translate them. Please post them either on my talk page or on yours.

Thanks in advance.

talk) 15:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Final Fantasy

There was no reason to reverse the order of Kingdom Hearts / Mana, at least not without stating something on the page. That's why I reverted the edit.Ultimahero (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mana series came first (FFA in 1991 vs KH1 in 2002). Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So?Ultimahero (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So Mana is mentioned first. Also don't revert the whole thing if you only disagree with one modification (I updated the "latest release" line too and you keep reverting that for no reason). Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 16:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's simply an argument from authority. You have to demonstrate why it should come first, not just state that it does. And I reverted it because you made several edits to several areas with only one given reason. I consider that dishonest.Ultimahero (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riiight. You just singlehandedly killed
WP:AGF. But whatever, I asked the question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games for more input. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

It is dishonest. You state one reason for making the edit, when in reality you have made multiple edits that wouldn't all fit under your stated reason. I am not suggesting that you are a liar or that you had bad intentions. I'm simply saying that you are claiming only one edit, but you really have preformed multiple edits. Thus what you stated is not the entire truth.Ultimahero (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further reflection, dishonesty implies bad intentions, and I do not think that you had such. So I apologize for my careless terminology.Ultimahero (talk) 16:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Birthday page

Hello. I have no issue with the 3rd Birthday page showing true neutrality in the form of stating solely the numbers. I only change the article to say "mixed reviews" whenever someone tries to claim the game got all or mostly positive reviews, because if we're going to describe a supposed general overview of critical response to the game, "mostly mixed" is more accurate than "mostly positive." Mostly positive implies all about a few reviewers scored it high and had almost no issues with the game when that's not the case. If there is no claim of the game having "mostly positive" reception, I won't edit it to more accurately reflect the truth at present. 99.136.194.159 (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One other person has noted the inappropriateness of having such a major spoiler at the top of the page on this article. I switched back my inital edit because you noted the whole WP:SPOILER thing. That's fine, but I'm not sure if that applies here...it still seems rather odd that you would really want something that crucial to the storyline there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.54.5.133 (talk) 02:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy VII

Hello. I noticed your edit on Final Fantasy VII page that you changed Compilation to series. I reverted that back because there is no source stated that, the prequels and sequels of the game as a whole is called that. Even in the special features on Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children Complete they consider it as a Compilation instead of a series. Since Final Fantasy VII as a game is part of the main series of Final Fantasy TigerFan2011 (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

There's a reason why these are in templates, and if you vandalise this again, you will be reported to admins and very most likely blocked. --Discographer (talk) 21:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to tell you know more. Also, check out the categories box, and the template - these are different categories. You change this, then you change every single template first. --Discographer (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct in your message to me, so stop edit warring! --Discographer (talk) 22:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonathan Hardin'. Will you weigh in on this topic, since it has to do with an edit you made to that section?

talk) 17:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Hey Jonathan. Hope you don't mind but I placed Chrono Trigger: Crimson Echoes up for DYK. I also want to know if you are planning on getting it to GA since in three months, it needs to be part of Chrono titles. GamerPro64 02:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's a good idea, I didn't think about it. Also totally forgot about this needing to be part of the Chrono Good Topic, but I guess it shouldn't be *that* hard to get it to GA in under 3 months. I'll definitely try to. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I always avoided creating an article for it, despite knowing that its notability could absolutely be defended thanks to the press coverage. If you need any help writing any of the sections, let me know, and we could always do it by proxy. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 00:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me Jonathan. I'm trying to find a reference to the sentences "New minigames were designed to reward players with items and equipment, including a "Coliseum" battle mode based on that of Final Fantasy VII and a casino featuring luck-based games. The development team made the battles more difficult than in Chrono Trigger, as they felt players would be familiar with challenging role-playing game." Since you wrote them on the article, I wanna know if you got it from a website or from playing the game. GamerPro64 20:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chrono Trigger: Crimson Echoes