User talk:Jpg1954
Belated welcome
|
- p.s. I've responded at Talk:Computer virus. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Insert-signature.png)
exasperation
I just posted reply to another editor on my user page that may be the end of trying to contribute -- sorry Michael P. Barnett (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
day after
Thanks for your encouragement. My user discussion just got branched to the extent I thought it least confusing to reply here. In view of Johnuniq's reply there, I am following it with a low key explanation of concerns concerning WP verifiability -- NOT opposing it, but asking how it can be strengthened. I will email the Crystal Growth society and journal people about putting the Bill Bardsley piece somewhere more formal. If I set up a recollections site it would be supplementary -- I will not give up the WP role -- only mentions of Malvern / RRE non substantive -- and I would let you know. I am concentrating on Coulson and Wilkins articles now. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hetepheres I
I will give my comments and thoughts on the Hetepheres talkpage. I agree with the comment about "hotly debated" issues. Seems a bit much and could be expressed better. Including Reisner's report sounds good. But giving some weight to more modern scholarship is the way to go I think. --AnnekeBart (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- I made some changes in the article and added more references.--AnnekeBart (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
TRE history
I put a substantive paragraph and a meta-paragraph in the TRE Discussion page as result of chance observation of Reg Jones book in public library. I have a couple of articles with higher priority for me than the dog work on what RRE people did, and these have been put into temporary limbo by hair splitting wiki-legalisms, and the "people cannot be mentioned unless they are wikipedia notable gambit". Was the construction of the Gunn biography an atypically happy WP experience? I will look on my user page for comment Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I have no idea if this is typical, as it is the first one I have made a major contribution to (others have been small points).
I suspect it has a lot to do with how many different people have a sense of "ownership" of the subject/article.
It will be interesting to see what happens as a result of Gyromagician's request for formal review. Jpg1954 (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I just put material into
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 16:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FYI Kudpung (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
info
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kudpung —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.206.140 (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jpg1954. I just want you to be sure that I know nothing about the above link and who posted it. It geolocates to New Jersey and it may have been sent in good faith as it seems to have been sent to a number of editors who have worked on the same articles asyou and I have. My RfA isn't going as well as expected, but in the light of the unsigned canvassing, it's probably best you stay away from it. Regards, --Kudpung (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Interesting. I assumed it was some sort of normal notification process. The "unsigned" did not register as a red flag. Good luck.Jpg1954 (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Ridley–Watkins–Hilsum theory and Gunn effect articles
Will try to follow up on Wednesday. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC) If you could email me, it would make it very much easier for me to help get authoritative closure on these. I can be tracked down very easily. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Done Jpg1954 (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Colwich church name
Many thanks - yes, you're right, it should be St. Michael and All Angels and I have amended the articles accordingly.
Robocoppster (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Robocoppster
Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry de la River has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
File:Meacham 50th Anniversary Color 002.jpg listed for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meacham 50th Anniversary Color 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)