User talk:KamalMahrshi

Hello, KamalMahrshi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, HeenaPanchal, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want HeenaPanchal to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heena Panchal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet

WP:GNG

. "7th best item girl of 2015" is not sufficient to establish notability (espeicially without a reference!), and her imdb page shows only a single credit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heena Panchal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heena Panchal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Kamia-Mulhotra.jpg

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamia Mulhotra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KamalMahrshi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "Undisclosed" in Infobox fields. If something is undisclosed, it is unknown; if it is unknown, we do not state it (i.e., the field is left blank). General Ization ^Talk 03:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wanted: Dead or Alive (1984 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disco Dancer, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aadat Se Majboor. General Ization ^Talk 00:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KamalMahrshi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KamalMahrshi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit to

I saw other people complaining on your page too and I am sorry to say it seems you have become the Mafia of Wiki and you will decide who will get what share here. If you see carefully my edits and if you have even the smallest knowledge about Bollywood where I belong to what I have added is precious information about missing credentials, missing plots of movies, some of the great actors who were not even mentioned at their rightful places have been edited by me. First have some knowledge about the field and then come up with your comments dude! If I am applying to AFC also is for the rightful place of people from my fraternity because you guys who know nothing about noteworthy people here keep rejecting their drafts, so it's very important someone from here takes the charge to help them and not you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KamalMahrshi (talk • contribs) 10:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"it seems you have become the Mafia of Wiki" lol. gettin' respect like

Bollywood movie, ever. "is for the rightful place of people from my fraternity" Thanks to your edits, that list is now protected permanently. You should have left well-enough alone. "so it's very important someone from here takes the charge" Good luck with that. You might consider Facebook, instead. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, KamalMahrshi. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]