User talk:Kashmiri/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 8 |
Orphaned non-free image File:Consilium.svg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Shelby Charter TWP
I don’t know how to direct message you, anyways, I try to make changes to the Shelby TWP Wikipedia page and this Wikipedia-bot keeps deleting them. If you could give me some sort of admin privileges for Shelby Charter TWP only, that would be much appreciated, as I live here and a lot of stuff has changed in the past couple years. My older account had around 3,500 edits so I’m familiar with the UI but I lost the email and password associated with that account so I my modifications end up getting removed immediately, even when I’m correcting typos. Any correspondence would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Chuckski IV Chuckski4 (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ 16:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Kashmiri: Thanks for the tip, makes a lot of sense, will do. Wikipedia is not as it was 10 years ago probably for the best, lol. Thanks again. -Chuckie IV
RfArb stuff
No problem. Suggest you just move your comments, and I will fix the rest. Coretheapple (talk) 14:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Coretheapple: Done. Can you fix my earlier comments please? Thanks, — kashmīrī TALK 19:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Done. I'm with you on Wilby, though I think a few of his adds might be worth keeping. Coretheapple (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Philip Cross (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
hi
hi , i hope you are as well . right im not part of pcloud.com . i use pcloud.com from a years ago to now and i used that as backup service and to be honest they provide better free host more than all sites are mentioned in wikipedia. all websites you mentioned in the article have permium account too . i wonder how you dont know pcloud.com
please read the articles here :
Popular Science: https://www.popsci.com/pcloud-storage
https://www.cloudwards.net/review/pcloud/
https://www.sonntagmorgen.com/pcloud-test/
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/pcloud.com
cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramtinataee (talk • contribs) 21:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ 16:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kaifyy
Hello, Thanks for your 'kind'response. The contribution made by me was not intended to be promotional and it was only to inform the readers that something on the subject has been written somewhere. That's all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaifyy (talk • contribs) 17:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hello @not a repository of links and you seem to be the editor-in-chief of the publication you keep adding, hence your edits can well be considered promotional. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is for English-language readers and listing non-English publications (other than as sources) is pretty much pointless. — kashmīrī TALK17:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Further reading
Whilst I agree with your edit to
) 17:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)- @Johnbod:
- MOS:FURTHER: "Any links to external websites included under "Further reading" are subject to the guidelines described at Wikipedia:External links."
- Wikipedia:External links: "Outside of citations, external links to English-language content are strongly preferred in the English-language Wikipedia. It may be appropriate to have a link to a non-English-language site (...) per the guideline on non-English-language sites."
- non-English-language sites – take a look pls :) — kashmīrī TALK 17:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
I agree that the page is in English and Further Readings should be suggested in English, but many people from many other backgrounds (like me) keep visiting Wiki pages, and it could be helpful if they find something related to what they are searching (it is not completely pointless). However, thanks for your response and please if possible pay some attention to the content of your page as well. Good Night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaifyy (talk • contribs) 17:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- It is absolutely pointless to list a publication that's not available online. Do you really expect that a Wikipedia reader will go and do a mail order of your magazine based on an entry in Further reading? If not, why you keep adding it to so many articles? — kashmīrī TALK 17:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Dear friend, everything is not available online, but a one-line information can be a help for a researcher to know that something has been done somewhere. If according to you, "Further Reading" is not a suitable title for such information, then you can suggest something better... why are you fighting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaifyy (talk • contribs) 18:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please read 18:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaifyy (talk • contribs) 18:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Date of Indus Valley civilization
The recent archaeological findings of Indus valley civilization both in India and Pakistan such as Mehergarh, Birhana, Kalibangan, Rakrigiri have pushed the date of IVC much older to 7000 BCE. The early mature phase started at 5500 BCE- 3500 BCE, so it needs to be updated in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjoydey33 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Needs a 22:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Siddha Yoga
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi, Please discuss why you think
- @Sanjoydey33: Some of Siddha Yoga teachings are based on Hinduism. A lot of SY teachings are based on Kashmir Shaivism which is a philosophy and not a religion. I see that you are trying to stick Hinduism (religion) into everything but please stop, there are valid reasons for not describing anything remotely connected to India or Indian traditions as "Hinduism". — kashmīrī TALK 19:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Kashmiri Shaivism is not part of Hinduism, please stop misrepresenting lot of authentic pages and sources. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- @
- @Sanjoydey33: Your knowledge of Indian philosophy is superficial and, I dare to say, incorrect, and I suggest you refrain from touching any article that has to do with Indian philosophy. (1) Hinduism does not "have" any "six philosphical schools" - three of the six darśanas originated well before Hinduism, and two (Nyaya and Vaisheshika) have absolutely nothing to do with religion. (2) There have been many more schools of philosophy in ancient and medieaval India than the six darshanas. (3) Siddha Yoga is not a branch of Yoga philosophy per se but one of hundreds of mystical traditions; its "Muktananda edition" borrows some general concepts from Kashmir Shaivism (faithfully but superficially - Muktananda was not a philosopher nor did understand Sanskrit well) but is otherwise quite faithful to the traditional South Indian tradition of the Siddhas. (4) Kashmir Shaivism is not "the oldest school of Shaivism"; Shaivist traditions precede Vasugupta by several centuries (e.g., Kapalika). It is also almost purely a school of philosophy (and mystical practice) with almost non-existent elements of organised religion. (5) Your proposition of "four denominations in Hinduism" has no basis in reliable academic sources and is so absurd that I don't feel like commenting further. — kashmīrī TALK 23:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've copied this discussion to Talk:Siddha Yoga#Shiva statue; please continue there. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- ^ a b "The Scriptural Tradition". Retrieved 2009-12-02.
No subject
Hi why you deleted name of mir sayyid Ali Hamadani, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamadani suffism (talk • contribs) 16:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
BLP issues on British politics articles arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 22, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 23, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
If you no longer wish to receive notifications for this case please remove your name from the listing here
For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias (T)(C) 19:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping
It was a pleasant surprise for me to find that you had also edited Saghar Siddiqui while I was away from my computer. I finished it this morning. I do appreciate what you did, though. Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Need clarification.
What made you revert back changes that I made again? I provided citations as well. Adding The Truth (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- @ 21:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand what was wrong about it. It was claimed by a prominent leader of that particular area and I just added that. What's wrong with it? Isn't this a fact that the leader said that? That person is a renowned expert of Balochistan since he comes from there. Are you kidding me? Adding The Truth (talk) 21:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Once again: read 07:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: लोलेसरा
Hello Kashmiri. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
) 15:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)- @Amorymeltzer: The pages was moved one day after it was created under Devanagari name [1]. It was (and still is) an orphan page and clearly remained under the radar until I spotted it at today's ANI report and subsequent indef of its creator.[2] Considering all of this, as well as because redirects are there to help locate and navigate articles while लोलेसरा is an unlikely typo, and as going through full RfD would be a waste of everyone's time, I still think speedy is the best solution. — kashmīrī TALK 16:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'll grant that four days is near-enough the spirit of "recently created" to be fine, but that was nearly four months ago. As this redirect has now existed for that time, I think ) 16:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
AFRICA UNITE PARTY
I just discovered you had the africa unite party wiki removed. im not sure why. pleas explain. this looks like malicious activity as this is a registered political party with a history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthoceans (talk • contribs) 15:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) FYI Kashmiri, this is years old stuff. Home Lander (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @ 09:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
1. IT ISNT POORLY SOURCED AT ALL! theres dozens of online sources . I think you cant blame other editors here. This is an insult to our country. The AUP has a history that has been fighting corruption and racism and you have decided to erase it because it wasnt written to your standards. The links attached to it prove that it has been in the media. The tv etc. This is bigotry and racism against african people. We have over 100 000 members. Many other articles are far less sourced. 2. How do we get back the article and do the necessary edits- if they dont satisfy your requirements? 3. This feels like a racist act of bigotry and malicious in intent. Theres no basis for this deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthoceans (talk • contribs) 14:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
CHECK THIS OUT DUDE....http://www.elections.org.za/content/Parties/Political-party-list/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthoceans (talk • contribs) 14:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Earthoceans::
- Existence alone in not a sufficient reason for having a Wikipedia article – the subject has to satisfy community consensuswas that the article should be deleted due to lack of notability.
- By writing "we have 100 000 members" you suggest that you have a conflict of interest. You should perhaps stay away from this article.
- Accusing a fellow editor of racism is a blockable offence– mind your words or you will be blocked from editing.
- Existence alone in not a sufficient reason for having a Wikipedia article – the subject has to satisfy
- Additionally, care to explain how got you claim AUP has "100 000 members" but its website contains virtually no material for party members, last website post was 4 years ago while the party's official address is a PO Box? At the same time, no English-language electronic media have carried a single article mentioning AUP since April 2014? I think I am not the only one here who feels that you are making things up. — kashmīrī TALK 21:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
I just read through your comments about our party. You are not a south african - but even if you were - I woiuld tell you the same thing- we are a real party registered on march 7 2014. we charged president zuma with theft fraud and corruption and it was our actions that led to his eventual resignation. I apologise for calling you racist- perhaps insensitive is a better word. Ref to the media - we have not been active in the media sense - but ave been conducting our activities outside of south africa - you will hear from us again - when we run in next years elections. Our strategy has been grassroots and for that we dont need press or media. Not yet. But just so that you know... check the french media outlets in morocco- we have purposely boycotted zuma regime for its corruption. if helping to get rid of a dictactor is not notable... i dont know what is... fianlyl, if this is an impartial encyclopia about historical things... check the links... the aup is a part of south africna history and i see this as a biased attempt to erase it.
Hello Kashmiri, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the