User talk:Kc kennylau

Hi. When you recently edited List of isomers of nonane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the table of balanced ternary representations for various fractions. What was your source for this list? I think I found a couple mistakes when double-checking the larger fractions. Please respond in Talk:Balanced ternary#List of ternary equivalents for decimal fractions --Quantum7 21:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How did you do the division?--Kc kennylau (talk) 02:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was originally just double-checking via multiplication (eg 1/16 * 16 = 1). When I couldn't get it to equal one I calculated the answer by hand using long division. The only difference I found from decimal long division is that you have to carry a digit in the result if the remainder is more than twice the divisor. --Quantum7 16:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I used Wolframalpha to convert. E.g.[1]0.0011202122110201. Then, I convert 02 to +-.

1)0.0011202122110201
2)0.00++202+22++020+
3)0.00+2-+-20-+++-0+
4)0.002--+0-0-+++-0+
5)0.0+---+0-0-+++-0+

--Kc kennylau (talk) 07:48, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Balanced ternary/proof has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a proof or proofs, just trivial calculations. Per

WP:NOTHOWTO

entirely unencyclopaedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 01:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Affricate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current