User talk:KevCureton

Hello KevCureton! sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See

Hello, KevCureton. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, you would need to cite a source that explicitly states the film makes a playful reference to her...etc. DonQuixote (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the film itself. Are you disputing the quotes? Stop reverting my edits. I am improving the page by providing new content based on the film.

Nowhere in the film does it say the film makes a playful reference--that's the original research part. DonQuixote (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From

WP:OR

Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. and Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so.

It's literally telling you not to do that. DonQuixote (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kev, thanks for your edit to

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Raiders of the Lost Ark have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raiders of the Lost Ark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed incorrect information. That is not vandalism. By reverting my edit, you are reintroducing incorrect information. KevCureton (talk) 23:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is incorrect about it? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

His relationship to Marion was not “illicit.” KevCureton (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Is the underage part not illicit? The age difference? It was an inappropriate relationship and the reason for the breakdown in Indy and Abner's relationship. The Development section talks about how much younger Marion was than Indy. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She was not underage. The relationship may have been inappropriate, but it was not illicit. KevCureton (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to check the definition here [1] but this discussion is otherwise over. Use the Raiders of the Lost Ark talk page to solicit support for your view before changing it again or it will be considered disruptive.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]