User talk:KingAntenor
This is KingAntenor's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Daily pageviews of User:KingAntenor
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
BLP issues summary
|
---|
|
Request for comments on infobox at United_States_presidential_election,_2016
An RfC was started at
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
You are invited to participate in the here !
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
New wikiProject invite
Hello, KingAntenor! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Bcharles (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically
- - @Marchjuly I didn't upload any images. Before you revert my edits may I suggest you actually understand how to properly use WP:NONFREE? KingAntenor (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I am aware that you didn't upload the file in question. If you carefully read the template you will see it says "it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page...." (underline added by me to clarify) . The two files you added to the article are licensed as non-free and their use in that article does not comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. So, may I suggest that before you add an image to an article that your check its licensing first. If it's a non-free logo, then check ]
Invitation to WikiProject Portals
The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.
You are invited to
There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.
Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.
It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.
The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.
A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
Let's do this.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 10:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 22:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, KingAntenor. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Socialism
Hello! I've noticed you have the WikiProject Socialism userbox in your user page, but you didn't sign up in the project. You can do so in the WikiProject Socialism page, clicking the Join WikiProject button. If you have any doubt, feel free to ask it in the WikiProject talk page. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
For additional information, please see the
Doug Weller talk 10:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Beresford
Why was my edit for the BeresFord reverted?
- Unsourced and not really appropriate to have in a lead. Please refrain from adding unsourced or dubious content to the encyclopedia. KingAntenor (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
"Britannia (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Britannia (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Britannia (board game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Nomination of Idaho Green Party for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idaho Green Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)