User talk:Lenina Libera

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Thornburgh, Lenina Libera!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you edit the article yourself and decide how we solve the problem of the way the article is set up.
We have a claim of claims of scientific evidence of astral projection is pseudoscience
We have a claim of there is no scientific evidence of astral projection
I would suggest the second claim is redundant if we have already established that
A) claims of scientific evidence of astral projection is psuedoscience.
I think we should edit the sentence to say:
claims of scientific evidence of astral projection is pseudoscience, therefore, there can be no scientific evidence of astral projection

I mean if we've already established A), then B) should follow. It's redundant to formulate an entire sentence seperate from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.100.84.247 (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 17:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

Psychedelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daask (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Huh? I don't see any reversion. Lenina Libera (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lenina Libera: My apologies, I guess I forgot to hit the revert button. It is now done. However, I would be glad to have this material restored with appropriate sourcing. You can cite the book itself for some parts, but definitely need another source for the "fictionalized autobiography" claim. Daask (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Daask: Why isn't the book itself sufficient? My copy states in the preface that "The beginning of PIHKAL is autobiographical, detailing the lives of two fictional characters". Lenina Libera (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lenina Libera. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]