User talk:LeotheBoy1110

UTRS appeal #46873 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LeotheBoy1110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

LeotheBoy1110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Walking Weird Studios is just the name of my gmail. I have no real way to prove that my page submissions don't promote something. The Shnobbs' Countdowns page I made, also the ShnobbsStudios page I made, all the links I added were strictly for source. Not because I wanted to promote them. But if I'm unblocked, I'll be sure to delete those pages if you want me to. And if you want me to change my user name, I will be happy to do so. I will work at it and be good to the roles of wikipedia.

Accept reason:

The block has already been removed by an administrator who didn't close this unblock request, so I have done it. JBW (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the formatting of your request for proper display; it must be placed outside the block notice, not overwritten over the example template. You highlight and copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window and paste it, filling in the information. 331dot (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I have checked online, and I am convinced that your username is not the name of a real studio. However, the fact that it looks like the name of a business is likely to be misleasing (as it was this time) so it will be much better if your username is changed, to avoid confusion. Would you like to suggest another username it can be changed to?
• I believe that you didn't intend your editing to be promotional. However, writing about fairly average YouTubers, who don't satisfy Wikipedia's
  notability guidelines
  , is not in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, and if it looks as though it is done to publicise them and make them better known then it will be considered promotional, whether you meant it that way or not.
• My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.
• In your unblock request you said that you are willing to have your username changed, and also that you will be willing to have the pages you created deleted. If you will suggest a new username to use, and if you will not create pages which are seen as promotional, then I think it will be reasonable to give you another chance. Orangemike, do you have any opinion on this? JBW (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • JBW has summed things up quite well. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you will offer a new username to change to I will be willing to rename your account and unblock it, on the understanding that your future editing will be in line with what has been said above. Here's some information about how to get your username changed.

1. To save wasting time asking for a name that's alredy been taken, go to Special:CentralAuth, type your name in the box, and click on the button. If the name is already in use you will see some details about the account with that name, and if it isn't in use you'll see a red message telling you ther is no global account with that name. When you're found a suitable name come back here and post a message saying what the name is. If in that message you include {{ping|JBW}} and also make sure you finish the message with ~~~~ I will be automatically notified of your message, and will deal with it.
2. Unfortunately even if you choose a username which hasn't already been taken, the system may refuse to do the rename if it's very similar to a username which has been taken. To avoid having to waste time coming back to try another name, you may like to suggest some alternatives in case your first choice doesn’t work.
3. Once your username is changed, if you try to log in you'll be told you've used the wrong username or password. Just log in with the new username, and the same password as before. JBW (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found a user name that I would like to use. LeotheBoy1110. Is it good?

I've renamed your account. 331dot (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed you are adding episode articles for The Amazing World of Gumball. Just an FYI... when using {{infobox television episode}} - if the title is the same as the page title's episode title, you do not need the "title" - the infobox handles this automatically (otherwise, it ends up in the maintenance category Category:Pages using infobox television episode with unnecessary title parameter for cleanup). Also, most of the time you will not need "italic_title" in the infobox either. The only value for italic_title is "no" so it is only used if the title ends up italicized by other (automatic) means. Refer to the template documentation if you're not sure: Template:Infobox television episode ButlerBlog (talk) 16:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Why have my episode articles for The Amazing World of Gumball been turned into redirects? LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LeotheBoy. The articles you are creating, including your recent

Paw and Order (The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh) is incorrect and you've ignored ButlerBlog comment above about not to use the title parameter. Lastly, Template:IMDb episode exists, please use that instead of what you currently use. Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A Stuffed-up World for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. That was just a test. I don't mind if it's deleted. In fact, I was hoping it would get deleted. LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wish to tell you that both of these articles do not have enough sourcing to pass

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

How to be Ninja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be Ninja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A loose necktie (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

How to be Ninja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be Ninja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A loose necktie (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:LeotheBoy1110/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LeotheBoy1110! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I've been working on a new page for a SpongeBob episode, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi LeotheBoy1110! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I've been working on a season article for the first season of The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello I'm

]

Pooh Oughta Be in Pictures

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made this page when I was new and very unexprenced with Wikipedia. I don't mind if it's deleted. I need more experience before I'm ready to create pages. LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]