User talk:Lionsfaninphilly

Under the

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Taroaldo 22:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding this article. In the future, if you wish to avoid having deletion tags placed on articles you create, please consider starting the article in a plain text editor. Once you have enough content in the text editor (especially prose) you can transfer the article into Wikipedia and add relevant charts and other material. You can check out guidelines in

WP:NOT for further information. If you develop the article to meet these guidelines before uploading it to Wikipedia, you will likely avoid speedy deletion tags in the future. --- Taroaldo 19:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ECRHA – Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECRHA – Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 09:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005–06 ECRHA Regional Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005–06 ECRHA Regional Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shippensburg Raiders Roller Hockey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shippensburg Raiders Roller Hockey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Organization of the Year (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial and non-notable. Fails

WP:SPORTCRIT

. Completely unsourced. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Best Overall Record Trophy (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial and non-notable. Fails

WP:SPORTCRIT

. Completely unsourced. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article ECRHA – Goal Scoring Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial and non-notable. Fails

WP:SPORTCRIT

. Completely unsourced. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article ECRHA – Assist Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial and non-notable. Fails

WP:SPORTCRIT

. Completely unsourced. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article ECRHA – Scoring Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial and non-notable. Fails

WP:SPORTCRIT

. Completely unsourced. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lionsfaninphilly. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 14:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Haggy.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low-res, zero context - who is this?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tommy Hagg controlling a Hockey puck.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the