User talk:Manzzoku

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that almost none of the sources you are providing for these articles are considered

I redirected again

Brand New Cadillac (RudeGRL & CC song). The article from Broadway World has an opinion about the single, but it does not go much in-depth, probably it would be useful in combination with other sources. Regarding your opinion about the reliability of the website, a search on BroadwayWorld.com reveals thousands of citations on Wikipedia, which appears to show it as a normal accepted source. I run searches on thepunksite.com and zani.co.uk (that I used in the other RudeGRL & CC article with more in-depth reviews). While they do not reach thousands of citations like BroadwayWorld.com, they are still each over a hundred (it should also be considered that the topics they cover are more limited than the broad scope of BroadwayWorld). Manzzoku (talk) 08:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Being used in other articles doesn't necessarily make BroadwayWorld a reliable source, it just means many other editors have used it without checking to see if it's reliable. In this case, the opinion doesn't come from BroadwayWorld, they have just reprinted a press release from Contantinou and his management, because it's exactly the same text as the announcement on Constantinou's own website [1].

I think thepunksite.com may be acceptable as a reliable source – however, I doubt zani.co.uk would be considered acceptable, as it doesn't seem to have any full-time staff or editorial control, it seems to be a bunch of people contributing whatever they like from all over the world. I'm also going to remove the link to the Facebook article on 2% Out of Sync per point 10 of

WP:ELNO – you shouldn't link to websites that require the reader to register to access them, so this includes Instagram and Spotify. It would be much better if you could cite the issue, the date and the page number of the Vive le Rock article directly – it doesn't matter that it's not available online. Richard3120 (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I will provide the magazine issue details in a few days. Manzzoku (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Nomination of Clemen Chiang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clemen Chiang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemen Chiang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 14:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Steve Barnard

moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Steve Barnard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Barnard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Barnard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clemen Chiang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clemen Chiang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemen Chiang (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Weißer Storch (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Replaceable non-free use File:Trickster musician logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Trickster musician logo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Nicholas Emerson

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PakisOne (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]