User talk:Marvin 101

Hello, Marvin 101, and

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 10:28, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the note you left on my page just wanted to say thanks for the heads up. A friend called - -- CrossTempleJay talk 22:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Free Neuropathology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet

too soon

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Randykitty, this article is certainly a stub, but one could argue that being an official journal of several European Societies does qualify for Criterion 1: The journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area. Would you agree? I will add external references. --Marvin 101 (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, yes, you could argue that, but it would be incorrect. This would not be the first journal to fizzle, even when supported by much larger societies or big publishers. Whether it'll be "influential" remains to be seen (e.g., by looking at whether articles published in this journal will get cited). A journal this young has not yet had the time to become influential. I agree it looks promising and it might get picked up by MEDLINE soon (it will easily get included in PubMed Central and hence in PubMed, but that's pretty trivial for an OA journal). My hunch is to let the article be deleted for now and re-create it once it's included in MEDLINE, Scopus, or the Science Citation Index Expanded. At that time, ping me and I can help you to flesh out the article and provide adequate sourcing. --Randykitty (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free Neuropathology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Neuropathology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]