User talk:MasterNoah2015

Welcome

Hello, MasterNoah2015! ™ 04:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Getting Started
Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Easy A

Hey there, I would like to politely ask you to stop changing "generally positive reviews" to "critical acclaim" in the Easy A article. Also, in my revert of your original edit I gave an edit summary describing exactly why I was reverting - in future if you want to contest someone you're better off talking to them on their talkpage, lest you become involved in an

edit war. Feel free to tell me here or on my page why you think the film should be described as critically acclaimed, thanks. ^OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 22:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You're right about consistency, but I think it would be better to change the wording from the intro, rather than the wording in the reception section, as that section includes less positive reviews, and to me "critical acclaim" should only be used to describe a film that reviewed quite impressively good reviews, and a higher than 72% rating on Metacritic. Also, in future, remember to post comments on a user's talk page (sorry if I did not make that clear), and to sign your posts with four tildes ~ <-- those things. Thanks, ^OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 23:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a

Manual of Style

, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.

RE: Edits to Justified (TV series)

and Drag Me to Hell

I have reverted your recent changes. It appears you have been warned about adding such unsubstantiated hyperbol to articles in the past but have not taken heed if it. PLEASE STOP with unverifiable/unsupportable claims like "The series has near universal acclaim from critics" and "notable universal acclaim." Refer to the Wikipedia Manual of Style if you need further clarification. Sector001 (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Social Network, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -- Doniago (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]