I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Dethlock99 (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article Alisa Kajornchaiyakul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arjun (talk) 14:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arjun (talk) 14:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article Tavinan Kongkran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arjun (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arjun (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
The article Hellen Dausen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 07:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 07:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a
The article Dilay Korkmaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. John KB (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not assume
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John KB (talk) 04:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. John KB (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Recently you created 4 lists: List of Thailand's representatives to
The
Please add your opinion to the talk page of the articles, so we can decide on the best course of action. --John KB (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Miss Universe 2011, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John KB (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Natalia Gantimurova, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Don't see her birth date there, it's probably only visible to her friends. Will add a request for comment on the Reliable Sources Board. In the mean time, please provide another source for her birthdate John KB (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Maxy.
I asked for information on this issue. Take a look at the
Please do not add or change content without
I would like to help you by providing the source(s).Seligne (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serenay Sarıkaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenay Sarıkaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 02:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Universe Thailand special awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe Thailand special awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianga (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apantree Prayuttasenee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apantree Prayuttasenee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianga (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
The article Warunee Sangsirinavin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails notability requirements but more importantly violates the WP:BLP1E policy as an individual notable for only one event.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]