User talk:Maye Fernandez

Hello!--mjf9089 (talk) 06:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Wow!! Mixtec Culture is simply one of the best first articles I have ever seen. The amount of work you put in is INCREDIBLE. I very much hope you stick around on Wikipedia, you would make for an invaluable addition. Don't be afraid to reach out to me if you have questions, or need help/advice. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

thank you very much! mjf9089 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can't see this surviving Afd, especially with no refs. Bear this in mind before spending too much time on it. It duplicates several better articles we already have, & uses the wrong terminology all the time. Johnbod (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will consider it, thank you! mjf9089 (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm noticing a lot of structural parallels between

Yes! it was a translation from the spanish language article. mjf9089 (talk) 03:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

Hispano-Arabic homoerotic poetry

added links pointing to Abadi, Silves and Ibn Ammar

Habitability in yellow dwarf systems

added a link pointing to Yellow dwarf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, mjf9089,

Thank you for creating Thermally induced shape-memory effect (polymers).

we need to know which reference supports each sentence or paragraph in this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your commentary on the page. The thing about adding references is that the original featured article in Spanish doesn't have them. Since I only translated (as noted on the talk page of the article), I don't have any way to know which references correspond to each section. What can I do in such case? mjf9089 (talk) 22:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a lot of work for the person who did not write it in the first place. I suppose you have to read all the references and the article, and figure out what supports what paragraph and sentence in the article. That will likely take longer than the original writing. We can ask user:Iqmann, though they have been inactive for 10 years. Also we learn that Spanish featured article may not meet the standards here (for DYK, GA or FA). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maya, why do we need two articles on this topic? It certainly feels like a content fork? Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see the page has been moved to Mormyroidea, so that's resolved. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the other articles in other languages, and references and normal names for superfamilies, it looked to me as if the name should end in -oidea. I hope that is correct. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

Hi Maye Fernandez, How goes it. I do like these big articles your creating. The History of opera article is magic. It needs some work still. On reviewing it, Ref 33, 61, 76, 201, 254, 255, 256, 263, 350, 366, 578, 599, 651 have Harv errors. I have a script, when I review the page, it shows the page errors, i.e. on the references. For example, ref 33, when you click on it, it doesn't go anywhere. Are you wanting to repair them. It probably just needs the citation in. I see it now. "Harv error: link from CITEREFAzcárate_RistoriPérez_SánchezRamírez_Domínguez1983 doesn't point to any citation." It appears to be the one citation thats missing. A tiny overstep on a giant leap for wikipedia kind. Great article. scope_creep^Talk 10:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed in the "Impressionism" section, there is a unfinished sentence, i.e. "beginning of the xx</ref>" scope_creep^Talk 11:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello! I definitely didn't notice those ref details but i'll be sure to check them out and get them fixed. same with the missing sentence in the "impressinism" section. thank you so much for your kind words! mjf9089 (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For the truly excellent History of opera and for all these other chunky articles your writing. I sincerely hope the good work continues. If you need any kind of help, please contact me. scope_creepTalk 11:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you!! mjf9089 (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Maye Fernandez: I notice there is still one reference thats still broken, ref:350. I trried to fix it. I think it either the "ref=DOI" or "ref=DOII". I'm not sure to be honest. scope_creep^Talk 20:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i think i fixed it! please don't hesitate to let me know if everything else seems broken or odd. and thank you so much for your help! mjf9089 (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maye Fernandez,

Thank you for creating Pollination of orchids.

There are quite a few opinions expressed in Wikipedia's voice that need to be attributed to someone who holds that opinion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Jmcgnh}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maye Fernandez

Thank you for creating

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maye Fernandez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 38.25.11.151.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because your account isn't directly blocked. I recommend you go to

WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Maye Fernandez. Thank you for creating

Good work. Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the translation for

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Queen (Lady Gaga song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen (Lady Gaga song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sricsi (talk) 19:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The translations and overall work you do is great. There is a relevant help page about procedures of translated articles (Help:Translation). You can find a template there to add to your translation works (Template:Translated page). Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 01:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I will make sure to check the pages you've pointed out. mjf9089 (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Outstanding translation work! Thinker78 (talk) 01:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hola Maye. He mejorado y ampliado el artículo Exploradores de España en la wiki en español. Veo que te preocupaste en traducir y crear la misma entrada en inglés. ¿Puedes actualizarla? Gracias --Gilwellian (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por decirme. Lo tendré en consideración. mjf9089 (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance tags on articles without resolving the problems. The second half of the article in undersouced - there are no citations on many of the paragraphs. Secondly, numerous "citations" are not citations at all, they point back to Wikipedia in Spanish. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source here on en-WP. These claims need to be sourced to verifiable, published secondary reliable sources. I noticed that the article was translated from Spanish to English. Spanish Wikipedia may have different guidelines for article references than English Wikipedia, but we need to abide by en-WP guidelines. It will be a beautiful article when it is completed. Netherzone (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maye,

you renamed the page Dielegembos into Dieleghembos, contributing the change to a spellingmistake. What would you consider as source for that decision? Naming things in the English Wikipedia for bi-lingual Brussels is indeed notoriously hard (and sensitive). Dieleghembos is old Dutch spelling, where Dielegembos is current spelling.

by the way, did you notice that your OKA-colleague who wrote the article broke two of the reference links?

Greetings from Brussels, SvenDK (talk) 04:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I used information from the wikidata page and since it didn't list "Dielegembos" as an alternate name, I assumed it would be better to rename it to the variant "Dieleghembos". If I was wrong and you think I should change it back, I'll be happy to do so, but this was my discerning criteria.

As for the references, I didn't notice them, but I can look at them later. It would be really helpful if you could also point out the error if you'd like. At OKA we don't write articles, we focus on translation, but the person who translated this particular article is no longer with us, so I'll improve some of her work overtime.

Thanks for the feedback! mjf9089 (talk) 04:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I double checked to be sure. All legal publications I found referred to Dielegembos, without h. I updated wikidata and added my source: https://etaamb.openjustice.be/nl/besluit-van-de-brusselse-hoofdstedelijke-regering_n2021020324

probably best you change the title again.

SvenDK (talk) 18:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted! Will change it back. Thank you for your help! mjf9089 (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion! mjf9089 (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]