User talk:Mdazey
Welcome
|
==Inez Hogan==
Thanks for your additions to the article. Any chance of bulking it out a bit more in the next couple of days to make it eligible for Wikipedia:Did you know? -- ALoan (Talk) 14:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Thomas O. Russell
I have added a "{{
Oregon history
Welcome to Wikipedia fellow Oregonian. I see you have been doing some work in history, especially Oregon history. With that in mind I invite you to join
WPOR Collaboration of the Week
Greetings
WPOR Collaboration of the Week
Greetings
WPOR Collaboration of the Week #3
Hello again
September WPOR Collaboration of the Week
First off, great job to all
On to this week. We are back to the usual two Top importance Stubs: Sunstone and Oregon, My Oregon. Both are stub pluses, so it shouldn’t take much to upgrade them both. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Good day! Aboutmovies 22:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
WPOR Collaboration: 09172007
All righty WPOR ladies and gentleman, great job last week with our state song and gemstone. I have bumped them up to Start class. I haven’t looked at the contributions, so the COTW award will be later. This week’s articles are Darlene Hooley, by special request, and another Top stub, our very own state rock, the Thunderegg. Yes, apparently we have a state rock and state gemstone. No word on whether there is a state stone too. Hooley basically needs some sources to make it to the next level. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. In the words of Beaver Joe, whoop! Aboutmovies 18:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Fall WPOR COTW
Welcome to autmun and the weekly COTW news. Great job to those who helped out with last week’s articles: Darlene Hooley & Thunderegg. Both made great improvements. This week, something a little different. With fall upon us, the photo ops are going to be harder to get, so we have a photo request fulfillment drive. Take a look at the requested pictures for Oregon category or the graphics subproject for what’s needed. Then go take a picture, or search online for a free picture to upload (US gov sites are great and there are links available from the above links). If you fill a request, be sure to remove the request template from the article’s talk page. Our other item is another red link removal drive, this time on the flagship Oregon article. Like the state parks red link drive, try to coordinate on the talk page. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 01:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Week 1 October WP:ORE COTW
I know everyone has been waiting anxiously for this week’s COTW, so here they are:
As to last week, it is difficult to track the items we were working on, but I know some pictures were added and at least three red links were removed from Oregon, so thank you to all those who participated. The award winner will be GoodDamon for their creation of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute article. We have now worked through all the Top class stubs and are into the High class stubs. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Happy editing, and remember if you see a downed power line, don’t pick it up. Aboutmovies 20:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
WPOR CoTW: Don Schollander & Conde McCullough
Greetings
your edits to a.o. Raymond S. Spears
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Raymond S. Spears, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see
- Please discuss your link additions on talkpages, especially since you are a librarian related to the site you are adding. For more information, see User:Beetstra/Archivists. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiOregon COTW
Greetings once again
Collaboration of the Week
Howdy doody ya’ll
SPAM ala COTW
New COTW
Hello again from
WPOR's newest COTW
Thank you to all
Oregon COTW version 11.20
Welcome to the jungle
WPORE Civil War COTW
Hello again to
FA for WPORE COTW
Greetings boys and girls from the fine folks at
Oregon COTW #25 (or so)
Hello again from the COTW of
Happy Holidays from WP:ORE
Hello again from the Collaboration of the Week for
Holiday COTW
Greetings to all the
New Year COTW from WP:ORE
Happy New Year to all the
Oregon GA COTW
Howdy to
On another note, just a general good job/pat on the back to the project for a great 2007, the first full year of the project. We had 83 DYKs about Oregon, improved one article to FA, and went from around 4 GAs to 17 GAs. Plus numerous new articles, improvements to existing, the introduction of the COTW, and the introduction of article assessment at the project. Again, great job and here’s to a new year. Aboutmovies (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Snowy COTW from WPOR
Hello again from
Tom Peterson says it time for Oregon COTW
Wake up! Wake up to a happy day! Says
Clown COTW
Greetings once again to members of the best encyclopedia online about Oregon (aka
As we have quite a few new members over the last six months, I’ll make another pitch for our various subprojects. Listed here, you will find a variety of groups focused on specific areas of Oregon from transportation to culture. Not only can you sign up and coordinate work there, but each often has useful sources and templates related to that topic. No pressure, just an introduction to those new to the project. Adios. Aboutmovies (talk) 17:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Our weekly COTW message from WPOR
Welcome to another wonderful world of
Old Buildings and Pictures
Greetings from
March 14 OR COTW
Hello again or welcome if you are new to
This week, its back to stubs with one of the largest newspapers in the state, The Register-Guard, and a request with Oregon Coast. Feel free to help with either one, and the paper article is so short a DYK should be pretty easy to get (just need 5X expansion). As always, to opt out, opt in, or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Vera Katz and History
Howdy folks, its time for another installment of
Elected Oregon
Hello fellow
Juxtaposition COTW
Howdy Ho
Cinco de COTW
Greetings once again from the Collaboration of the Week at
Zzzz Oregon COTW
Howdy ya’ll, time for another Collaboration of the Week from
QWERTY: Oregon COTW
Hello
X marks the WPOR COTW spot
Guten Tag
A is for Apple at COTW
Hello again to those of the
Xtra COTW
Greeting once again
Qrazy sale at COTW! Act now! Total liquidation!
Greetings
Summer Time in the COTW
Hello again to those of the
Zebras are not allowed to participate at COTW, but penguins may
Howdy ya’ll, its
1 Year of the Collaboration of the Week
Hello again to those of
This week marks the one week anniversary of the COTW, so a brief highlight reel:
- At least 10 DYKs
- Three articles passed GA after being listed at COTW
- Probably around 25 articles started
- Almost all Top importance articles are now better than Stub class
And now on with our countdown. This week we have two requests, the Willamette Meteorite and Tom McCall. Hopefully we can get both to GA quality. Click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Thank you. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Jim N E Cricket, its another Oregon Collaboration of the Week
Greetings
Proposed deletion of Granville Knight
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Granville Knight, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Granville Knight – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
Articles for deletion nomination of Randall V. Mills
I have nominated Randall V. Mills, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall V. Mills. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of William Woodard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Woodard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Woodard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
The article Alice Henson Ernst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails
author notability standards. No major reviews of her work nor any indication from the article or from a source search that her work has had an impact in her field.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 12:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Alice Henson Ernst for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Henson Ernst is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Henson Ernst until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 16:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)