User talk:MegaSmike46

OK. No matter how plausible the idea is. I just kept that draft in case. It won’t be submitted until confirmation. MegaSmike46 (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter how "plausible" the idea is—it doesn't exist. Creating an article as if it does exist is creating a hoax. Trivialist (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MegaSmike46! Thank you for your contributions. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Alvin and the Chipmunks into another page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 03:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 09:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Template:Warner Bros. Discovery has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At

At

List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American TV channel). I'm actually have trouble with the redirecting issues. My goal was to separate the Cartoonito and Boomerang articles but I ran into ridiculous issues. Signed, MegaSmike46 (talk

), 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi @

talk) 04:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CBS Eye Animation Productions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Radio Disney into Disney Channel. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Template:Former Treehouse original programming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cartoon Network, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 03:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeff Bennett, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was:

It is probably a notable topic, but the bulk of the article is unsourced and written in a very

WP:CRUFT

-y way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OceanHok (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

There are already multiple nav templates for DC and WB properties and this would only be used on pages which already have at least one of them. Everything in "Senior management) is a generic link except for films which makes the line somewhat redundant which leaves only three items which would likely already be in the template on the page. Can I suggest making changes to Template:Warner Bros. Discovery, Template:DC Comics and Template:Warner Bros. instead?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Template:DC Entertainment
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Template:DC Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 12:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay we’ll just have to wait and see as the company restructures. MegaSmike46 (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, how come WBD's content distribution/ad sales units are part of the

I felt it might join that division as I thought it'd make more sense. After all Content Distribution (Home Media) could correlate with the streaming division as well. I mean WB Interactive was part of WBHE for a time.

I may revert it, but until further confirmation, I guess WBD's Content Distribution will just remain under Warner Bros. Entertainment. MegaSmike46 (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney General Entertainment Content, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Kids.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still much of the content in unsourced. If sources do not exist, the content should be removed. Also, many of the sources used are not

reliable source

and anything that cannot sourced (exception is the plot), add in-depth coverage/reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so your saying that there needs more to be more reliable sources. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's two-fold. Content needs to sourced to

reliable sources and much of it is still not. For notability, it needs in-depth coverage and that is why I am recommending reviews from reputable critics (two or three reviews with a couple paragraphs or so critiquing the show). As I have stated above, I also recommend trimming it down (removing all the character and episode details along with the Media section as most of it is unsourced or sourced to unreliable sources such as YouTube anyway). S0091 (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

It appears that you copied or moved text from CNN to History of CNN. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll begin with apologizing for causing any corruption or confusion. It will be okay, as this is only the first step of helping the article. I may be sure to restore all citations before taking action.

I plan on rewriting the remaining from c. 2003 onwards. You can help, as a lot of this information requires updates anyway. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mush-Mush and the Mushables, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of

Hello MegaSmike46. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MegaSmike46. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MegaSmike46|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 0xDeadbeef 04:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Gargoyles episodes. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. I didn't see any indication within this article that the show specifically aired on Disney television networks. DonIago (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Gargoyles episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I have no idea why you felt it was appropriate to remove Category:Lists of Disney television series episodes from this list, as Gargoyles was a television series produced by Disney, but as the category is currently in dispute but has not been modified thus far, your edit seems highly inappropriate. You really need to stop making unilateral changes and instead collaborate with your fellow editors. DonIago (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the information under the Broadcast section (such as networks the show aired on and its name in other languages) are unsourced. Additionally, I feel like Template:Cite episode would be more suitable for sourcing specific episodes (to show events or character traits), rather than a YouTube link.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scrooge200 (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toasy Cake Fan 100. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Teamo Supremo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't adding any further information. I'm simply checking and reorganizing the categories. It's one of the several cartoons that switch from airing on ABC kids to Toon Disney. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this category from the pages for individual characters that you have placed it on as they are in the parent category for the lists category as they are... not lists. Wanted to let you know my reasoning since it seems you reintroduced the category. Thanks! - Purplewowies (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you seek to have a category speedy renamed without going through the full discussion, you need to add an entry at the speedy area of the categories for discussion page for it so that it can be properly opposed, otherwise you haven't actually completely gone through the request process. It's not like a speedy deletion where you just put the template on the page and call it a day. - Purplewowies (talk) 01:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wasn't sure where to place them at first, so I'm glad you helped out. There's no need for further discussions; I'm just trying to sort things out with Disney Channel. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you're still having an issue--the problem with what you're doing isn't the template you're using, it's that you're not creating the accompanying entry on the categories for discussion board (either in the speedy area for the speedy template or as a full discussion on the CFD board for the regular CFD template). The templates provide a link to where you need to add the entry and the exact format of the entry you should be adding (that is, some info about what move you're looking to do alongside a place for you to explain your reasoning. You still haven't done that part. - Purplewowies (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to at least slow down and at most entirely desist with your Disney-related category edits and find other ways to contribute to the project. It would be concerning enough that you're attempting to make changes without any apparent discussion, much less

Please be careful when moving templates and adding speedy deletes to redirects. You added a speedy to Template:Live-action theatrical films based on DC Comics but that caused multiple articles that linked to that pages, such as American Splendor (film), to appear in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I made simple typo and just wanted it deleted to avoid confusion of redirects. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It was a bit confusing. Once all the articles are using the new template the redirects can be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't the most experienced Wiki user, so I made multiple decisions without discussing them with editors. I failed to meet their community concerns at the time while I was offline with anxiety and ended up blocked. It's been over a year since that incident, and I've been off this website for months. I won't make major changes without small group discussions (e. g. templates and redirects), but the ever-changing entertainment industry has intrigued me. I'm the one who sorted out these articles (e.g. notably Cartoonito, Boomerang, Jetix, BVS Entertainment). I found the missing programs for Disney Channel.

If you give me another chance, I'll continue to recover lost media about certain topics and join those group discussions.

MegaSmike46 (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I wasn't the most experienced Wiki user, so I made multiple decisions without discussing them with editors. I failed to meet their community concerns at the time while I was offline with anxiety and ended up blocked. It's been over a year since that incident, and I've been off this website for months. I won't make major changes without small group discussions (e. g. templates and redirects), but the ever-changing entertainment industry has intrigued me. I'm the one who sorted out these articles (e.g. notably [[Cartoonito]], [[Boomerang]], [[Jetix]], [[BVS Entertainment]]). I found the missing programs for [[Disney Channel]]. If you give me another chance, I'll continue to recover lost media about certain topics and join those group discussions. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I wasn't the most experienced Wiki user, so I made multiple decisions without discussing them with editors. I failed to meet their community concerns at the time while I was offline with anxiety and ended up blocked. It's been over a year since that incident, and I've been off this website for months. I won't make major changes without small group discussions (e. g. templates and redirects), but the ever-changing entertainment industry has intrigued me. I'm the one who sorted out these articles (e.g. notably [[Cartoonito]], [[Boomerang]], [[Jetix]], [[BVS Entertainment]]). I found the missing programs for [[Disney Channel]]. If you give me another chance, I'll continue to recover lost media about certain topics and join those group discussions. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I wasn't the most experienced Wiki user, so I made multiple decisions without discussing them with editors. I failed to meet their community concerns at the time while I was offline with anxiety and ended up blocked. It's been over a year since that incident, and I've been off this website for months. I won't make major changes without small group discussions (e. g. templates and redirects), but the ever-changing entertainment industry has intrigued me. I'm the one who sorted out these articles (e.g. notably [[Cartoonito]], [[Boomerang]], [[Jetix]], [[BVS Entertainment]]). I found the missing programs for [[Disney Channel]]. If you give me another chance, I'll continue to recover lost media about certain topics and join those group discussions. [[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46#top|talk]]) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}