User talk:Messhermit

This user may have left Wikipedia. Messhermit has not edited Wikipedia since December 28, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

AND WHY DID YOU DELEAT MY CHANGES TO List of dictators AND WHY DO YOU KEEP CHANGING THE LIST DISPITE YOU GETTING BANED FROM EDITING PART OF IT. please aswer me what is your problem--J intela 02:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

. I too would have e-mailed you concerning this but your e-mail option is disabled.--Jersey Devil 21:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template you created looks alright, all I really wanted was that the order be maintained. I also like how you split North and South Peru. Ask for the opinions of the other Wikiproject members in the project talk page.--Jersey Devil 21:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary was particularly harsh in the Marth Chavez article. I shouldn't have written what I did ("too damn bad"). Sorry for that. My temper got the best of me, and I will try to make sure that it doesn't happen again. --Descendall 03:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the name of the war? The new name you have proposed is ONLY used in Peru, but in the rest of Latin America (not only in Chile as you claim) the proper name is War of the Confederation. For one, the new name is erroneous because even though the war was fought mostly between the Confederation and Chile, those were not the only participants. Also Argentina participated and attempted invasion (unsuccesfully). Should it be then the Chilean-Argentinian-Confederation War? The clearest example is the War of the Triple Alliance, the alliance being Argentina, Brasil and Uruguay, against Paraguay. Nowhere you find that war called the Paraguayan-Triple Alliance War... If you want to make a change such as that, you should have submitted a request FIRST, and then take action Mel Romero 07:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments posted to my discussion page: As a University Professor, I recommend you do your homework (including copy-editing). Moreover, failing to provide verifiable sources and deleting what you disagree with is not NPOV. Please, restrain yourself from promoting your own “Fujimorista” political agenda and deleting verifiable sources. Many thanks!! User:bdean1963 8 September, 2006

Bdean1963 Apparently has his own political agenda, had refused so far to several attempts by my part to contact him and discuss the problems.

• He keeps asking for "sources" when he feels like (and modifying articles without stating his sources), deleting information that does not suit his opinion.
• Keeps reverting to what he consider "NPOV" version of the article in which he ask for "sources" for what he doesn't like, added the loaded term "Dictator" as category, and uses his own personal research and political bias as "neutral".
• He has reverted the article more than 3 times.
• Finally, I have spotted him using Wikipedia for advertising "Anti-Fujimori" political T-shirts [1]. Claims to be a "Professor" in some Midwest University and that his editions are "unpartial", but he has also modified the dictator [2],[3] and Slobodan Milošević [4] to support the sales of this T-shirt and his "Anti-Fujimori" political stand.

I have only received direct replies from him today (After weeks of failed attempts to reach him). He has also e-mailed me political spam (and clearly "Anti-Fujimori" Advertisement). Currently, I don't know what to do. He claims that he uses "NPOV", but it seems that he is pushing an "Anti-Fujimori" political agenda. Messhermit 20:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Messhermit,

Per your AMA request, I've taken a look at these and some of the other page diffs between you and Bdean1963, and think the editing issues are potentially solvable via the

WP:MEDCAB. On your call, I'll try contacting Bdean1963 to see if he would be interested in working out the issues there. I notice you 2 have not interacted in awhile, if you think the situation is over it might be better to let it go.--Amerique 04:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I filed an informal mediation request at

]

Re: The tshirt thing, where do you see that this user is posting t-shirt ads? The first link you posted showed something like that, but I couldn't identity who initially posted it.--Amerique 21:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, the issues look negociable at this point. A cabalist I have worked with before has agreed to mediate this case. I guess we will wait for word from him and Bdean before proceeding.--Amerique 00:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the case seems to address content issues primarily, ok to hold the mediation session on the talk page of the Fujimori article?--Amerique 07:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Carlos,

Addhoc has set up a mediation page off the Fujimori talk page. Meanwhile, with the itemized list you sent me, I think you did the right thing with removing the t-shirt link, but there is no special WP prohibition against using self-authored works as references under Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources. I think the mediation issues will center on your other editing conflicts with this user. Best,--Amerique 21:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that Wikipedia should be a place were anybody can self-promote its own publications. At least in Wikipedia Spanish they have severe implications to do that. I'll try to find out information regarding this issue, but I believe that the same must be used here; after all it's all about being impartial, not about describing one's personal POV. That book is ovbiously not going to contradict the editions of Bdean1963; after all, he write it himself. Messhermit 22:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well, there was once a proposal for a policy on this in the English WP, but the proposal itself was voted down

WP:EXPERT. To my knowledge, there is not a more definite statement on the English WP as to the appropriateness of using self-authored works published by reputable houses than the Reliable Source guidelines. If you want to argue that both the content and the reference used to support it are biased, we can do that, but I wouldn't ascribe "self-promotion" modivations to Bdean's activities in this matter, as it may be interperted as a lack of good faith on our part. I will see if I can check his book out of my university library to see what his facts are.--Amerique 23:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Messhermit, following your suggestion, I've set up a

Addhoc 18:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Connection trouble ate my initial response. The upshot is, it would be easy to argue that Bdean might be biased against Fujimori. There are plenty of examples of this in his essay, State Power and Indigenous Peoples in Peruvian Amazonia, such as:

The populist political system that emerged under Fujimori depended on the time-honored ploy of doling out state resources on the basis of political patronage... New patronage networks accompanying Fujimori's corrupt pork barrel policies took their place in Amazonia alongside older and more localized forms of clientelism. p202-203

Instead of the give and take characteristic of democratic, participatory governance, intimidation, complicity, and censorship were common leitmotifs of Fujimori's authoritarian regime. p204

Neoliberal legislation implemented during Fujimori's ten year regime countermanded constitutional and statutory protection of indiginous peoples' land rights established under previous governments. p213

One of the primary causes for the democratic crisis gripping Peru at the end of the 90s was Fujimori's autocratic effort to retain power for an unconstitutional third term (Andian Report 2000).

From WP:Reliable Source guidelines:

Exceptions to this may be when a well-known, professional researcher writing within his field of expertise, or a well-known professional journalist, has produced self-published material. In some cases, these may be acceptable as sources, so long as their work has been previously published by credible, third-party publications, and they are writing under their own names, and not a pseudonym.

That is the closest guideline that applies. I read the linked material you sent me. While I agree that it is hard to find academic material that is free from bias against politicians (this tradition goes back to

WP:NPOV policy is not a censorship policy, nor is it any sort of "positive information only" standard on WP. We can argue that the phrasing of Bdean's material might be biased, but we can't really argue against including it, nor should we ascribe "self-promotion" modivations to Bdean's activities on WP, as this can be interperted as a lack of good faith on our part.--Amerique 23:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Re: your last message. If you think you are getting bullied, that this has become a conduct issue, then I think we should drop the mediation right now. Proceeding with it won't work for the article if it becomes a flame war. I advise taking an extended break from WP for the time being.--Amerique 14:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am talking to Addhoc via email about this. At this point, I don't know if this will proceed. Will let you know as soon as I know.--Amerique 22:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because of edit warring on the article Alberto Fujimori [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], you are now banned from editing it. This ban expires when your probation expires, on 21 May, 2007. --Tony Sidaway 20:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you found out before I did. Oh well, while you did try to resolve things via mediation, you did so after you had already edit warred with Bdean. There is nothing I can do to argue against the enforcement of prior ArbCom decisions. Next time, I recommend stepping back and requesting mediation before allowing things to get to an "edit war" situation. Also, don't start edit wars in the first place by removing referenced material that is critical of whatever the subject of the article is, and declaring biases on the part of the editors who posted it. You must provide your own sources for any claims you want to make on any subject in any article on WP. If you can't find any prior research to support your claims, maybe there's a reason for that, but don't take referenced material down simply because it does not support what you feel is NPOV, you should provide information from other reliable sources to counteract that. You must write from reliable sources if you to become an effective editor on WP or an effective academic elsewhere.--Amerique 00:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Addhoc has already closed the case, and I doubt BDean would still want to go through with it. What you could do is repost the arguments you made on my talk page to the talk page of the article, and basically hope someone picks up on them. However, there was nothing wrong with Dean putting cite tags on unreferenced information, and repeatedly removing his referenced information was the wrong approach. You did the right thing with removing the t-shirt ad, as I don't know what he intended by that, but the other stuff at best you could have added additional referenced context to or edited the phrasing to make it sound more NPOV, not remove the content entirely. Anyway, I suggest posting messages on Dean's and Addhoc's talk pages to see if they would still be interested in pursuing this, but I personally need to take a break from WP for about a week or so to work on other things, so I would not be able to advocate for you if they agreed to carry on with this.

Personally, I think you should let this one go. If you had developed a good working/editing relationship with BDean, you would have gained a great contact with a Harvard Ph.D who could have provided you with a reference letter in any future grad school applications. Your empassioned defense of Fujimori has not advanced the article nor your personal interests. I don't see how you can salvage the situation now.

Regrettably,

Amerique 02:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with Messhermit. BDean seems to be pushing a political agenda.--AAAAA 11:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I diagree with User:Messhermit as well as with your assertion that I am "pushing a political agenda". --User:Bdean1963 28 0ctober 2006

• Hello Messhermit. Need you help here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Shining_Path --AAAAA 04:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know in what way can I help you. It is true that I have no sympathy for Sendero and the MRTA, but I don't understand the whole dispute. Messhermit 19:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The issue is that some Communist Wikipedians want to "elevate" Shining Path a misappropriate the name "Communist Party of Peru". I have no sympathy for Communists, but I think it is a crime to let Sendero-Apologists improve the standing of these Terrorist Shining Path group.--AAAAA 02:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop attacking bdean and other users. You can banned from user talk pages as part of your probation. So please cease. --Woohookitty^(meow) 09:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see. You told him that anything he says will be reverted. You also accused him of pushing a POV. And then once again, you threatened to revert anything he said. You also accused him of having a double standard and of being unethical and unprofessional. And these are just from Bdean's talk page. If you don't think that these posts are incivil and (some) are personal attacks, then I'm not sure what else to tell you. As for him bolding the word "banned", I get the feeling that he is responding to you using bold alot. Nothing you posted on my talk page could be considered a personal attack or even incivil. Borderline, maybe. And you know, you have sanctions against you via the arbcom. That limits your ability to engage in what you've engaged in on bdean's talk page. Honestly, I can see an argument for banning you from his talk page. I don't see a post from you on his page that is not some sort of attack or is incivil. --Woohookitty^(meow) 12:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I didn't even mention the arbcom threat. --Woohookitty^(meow) 12:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pushing a POV is not incivil. Calling someone a name can be, though it isn't always. Nothing else you list can be considered incivil. And btw, please try to be patient. I do have a life outside of Wikipedia, so I can't always get back to you instantly. To me (and this is just from the posts I've read), you are taking some of the attacks on the former Peruvian president personally. Please don't do that. I don't see any other reasoning for considering calling the president a dictator as being incivil towards you. If he called YOU a dictator, yes. But I don't think that's what you are talking about. And I am not sure where you got that pushing a POV is incivil. It isn't. Is it good? No. But incivil? No. --Woohookitty^(meow) 13:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your posting on my

]

30 October 2006

Hola, porque me revertiste las mejoras de estilo que realice en el articulo de Daniel Ortega. Tus reversiones arbitrarias estorban el desempeño. Lo vuelvo a revertir.--K4zem 22:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vaya lata, parece que la mafia de la wikipedia en español no descansa ni siquiera en al wikipedia en inglés. Se te ve el plumero con el sesgo como lo "caudillo Ortega". Echale flores a tu ídolo Fujimori, pero deja a los otros lideres latinoamericanos a que no simpatizas en paz. --K4zem 22:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no soy peruano, pero tu tampoco eres nicaragüense o ¿si?. Es bien conocido tu proselitismo político en wikipedia y lo de Fujimori es buen ejemplo, pero por desgracia no es lo único. Sobre la biografía de Daniel Ortega ya no es solo tendenciosa en la wikipedia en español (ahora hasta le califican "genocida" del pueblo miskito), sino también en la wikipedia en inglés gracias a personas como tú. No sigo perdiendo mi tiempo más en esta conversación inútil, solo espero que te paren los pies en tus ediciones unilaterales.--K4zem 09:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Peru page as living in or being associated with Peru. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Peruvian Wikipedians for instructions.--Balloonguy 19:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of

]

You may wish to note that I have radically changed Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Messhermit. You should review it now that the changes have been made. Thank you. --Descendall 08:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested a checkuser be run on you. You may see my request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Messhermit. --Descendall 02:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'm going to just ask you directly. From what I see, there are two possibilities:

1. There are two people who go to Miami Dade College. Both of them edit wikipedia at about the same time. Both use the same phrases when they edit. Both edit

. Both live in Miami. Both use BellSouth's ISP at home. Both agree with each other 100% of the time.

2. You have been editing articles that you are banned from editing.

Why not just be up front about it and tell me which one of those is the case. Is it 1, or 2? Honesty goes far.

Thanks.

Descendall 03:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too late. It was confirmed by the admins. Well, at least you went out gracefully: accusing me of being involved in a conspiracy against you. --Descendall 00:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Descendall I appreciate all of your efforts regarding User:Messhermit's conduct on the Wikipedia encyclopedic project. Your steadfast work has contributed to the clarification of User:Messhermit's disingenuous edits, not to mention his inappropriate commentary. Saludos--User:bdean1963 28 October 2006

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thatcher131 01:50, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Image tagging for Image:Alfredo_Stroessner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alfredo_Stroessner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The

November 2006 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The

December 2006 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The

January 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be

three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:MILHIST

Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring Ends

There have already been two pages that have had to be protected because of yourself and

personal attacks used by both sides in the dispute. If this edit warring continues in the Peru article or any other article both of you will be blocked. I hope both of you take this warning seriously because I will block both of you if it continues. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 00:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I am going to create an

civility. It would be good to get views from others in the Wikipedia community regarding this matter. During the duration of this RFC I ask that both of you avoid each other on other articles. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 01:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by continuing to edit war after being given a warning on History of Peru. The duration of the block is 24 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail [email protected]. --Jersey Devil 19:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no complains for this action. In fact,

Tacna Region. Messhermit 22:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

With regards to your comment, no. It is time you and the other user begin to use the talk page of articles to discuss changes minus the

personal attacks. And please do not try and solicit me to change articles in your favor again. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 02:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/War of the Pacific . For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) This message delivered by contact the Mediation Committee directly .

This message delivered: 08:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC).

I was not even aware that a Mediation was in place. :S Messhermit 18:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

War of the Pacific

Hey Carlos, thanks for the note! I was meaning to do some work on War of the Pacific. The war at sea is something I have no end of material on although I think some of it has a pro-Chile bias maybe. One of the books (Pierre Razoux, Le Chili en guerre) is subtitled "two centuries of naval supremacy in Latin America". Regarding the disputed stuff, it seems to me that it really belongs in a separate article. How does that seem to you? Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos, I was actually going to suggest expanding it, so it becomes like

History of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian territorial dispute. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

In the dispassionate interest of the advancement of knowledge free from censorship, I respectfully request that User:Messhermit reverts recent edits I have made on the War of the Pacific to accommodate alternative yet balanced points of view to reflect the historical record. User:Bdean1963 13 February, 2007

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hey, I know you dislike me and everything, but I wanted to say that I noticed that you mark almost all of your edits -- even reverts and fairly long comments on talk pages -- as minor. Remember, minor edits are ones in which "superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute" and that "any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." --Descendall 23:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Hi. Its on my watchlist. I am not very well informed about Peru but I do have respect for Fujimori and also believe we should keep to

SqueakBox 17:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. Thanks for the note. It would be good to check what books written since 2003 say. It's perfectly possible that someone has expanded on Fujimori's resignation since then. Historians are always revisiting things. Also, reviews of MacClintock's book may be interesting. Hope this helps! All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hours

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by continued edit warring in the List of Peruvian Presidents article. The duration of the block is 48 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail [email protected]. --Jersey Devil 20:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't complain. The only thing that bothers me a little bit is that I didn't initiate this whole mess. Messhermit 20:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The

February 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The

March 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The

April 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Mdc.gif

Hello, Messhermit. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Mdc.gif) was found at the following location: User:Messhermit. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Internal Conflict in Peru

Hello, I've seen your recent edits to this article. Your claim that Paniagua repudiated the CVR report based on http://www.agenciaperu.com/actualidad/2003/jun/paniagua_cvr.htm seems a bit of a stretch. The link only mentions he was against naming SL as a political party, not that he repudiated the final report. That statement should be toned down, don't you think? Greetings, --Victor12 14:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, however, your source does not support the claim you make in the article. I don't think Paniagua ever repudiated the CVR final report. Do you have a source for that? Greetings, --Victor12 14:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but neither did he repudiate it. There's no need to go from one extreme to the other. The article needs to be written in a balanced way. --Victor12 14:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the problem with the article is one of POV but rather one of lack of quality. The articles needs heavy editing to improve prose, achieve a broader coverage of its subject and better sourcing as currently most footnotes, if not all, refer to webpages. There's a lot of books out there that could be used to improve the article if someone has the dedication (and time) to do it. --Victor12 15:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tarapaca.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The

May 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Alberto Fujimori

Hey bud, what happened with that revert on my Al Fujimori edit? Was it the insertion of the term "alleged" that you didn't like? Really there was more to the edit than that, and I'd appreciate it if you'd pop the rest of the edit back in there, if in fact it was just the word "alleged" that you objected to... Or at least tell me what I seem to have done wrong.

Peace,DBaba 06:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:0083SouthBurning.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

here

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 09:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The

June 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 03:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The

August 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The

September 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The

October 2007 issue

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The

November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The

talk) 23:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Your vandalism of Anel Townsend

Kay Bailey Hutchinson's name, and deleted other material. --Descendall (talk) 04:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The

talk) 00:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kyriakos (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ancon estampa 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008

talk) 18:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The

talk) 05:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The

talk) 02:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sanchez-Cerro.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The

talk) 01:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The

talk) 01:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The

talk) 19:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The

talk) 02:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 22:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 23:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The

talk) 23:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008

talk) 22:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The

talk) 23:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The

talk) 00:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The

talk) 17:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The

talk) 03:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jerid Messa 1.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The

talk) 04:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The

talk) 04:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The

talk) 23:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Alberto Fujimori

Hi, I noticed that you are the original author of the

1992 Peruvian constitutional crisis article and have also significantly contributed to the Alberto Fujimori page in the past. Both articles contain a sentence similar to, "Two weeks after the auto-coup (or self-coup, the Bush administration changed their position and officially recognized Fujimori as the legitimate leader of Peru." On the Fujimori article there is a {{citation needed}} tag attached to it. Do you have a source for this statement? A link to the full text of Bernard Aronson's speech would be helpful too. Thanks, Khoikhoi 20:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

BTW, please reply on my talk page, thanks again. Khoikhoi 20:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Four Murasame.JPG)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zail Singh.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP

}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mohammed Rafie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:1941 Peru victory.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1941 Peru victory.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 23:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the talk) 21:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 16:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 04:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 23:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 23:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 23:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 22:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "

Military history WikiProject.[reply

]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)

Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for

reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole

page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Can you help verify translations of articles from Spanish

Hello Messhermit,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Spanish to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Spanish article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Spanish , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Spanish. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

1. Unicasa
2. Urica
3. Union_Cane
4. Unusual_weekly_newspaper
5. Upper_Court_of_Justice_of_Castile_and_Leon

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Spanish article, and assess them "Pass" or "Fail" (the {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} templates may be useful here). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then assessing it, that's even better, but it isn't required.) Also please note that we are assessing accuracy not completeness, so if the English article is much shorter that is okay, as long as whatever has been translated so far is factually accurate.

If you can help, please {{

ping}} me here to let me know. You can add your pass/fails above, right next to each link, or you may indicate your results below. Thanks! Elinruby (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Presidents of Peru by era

Template:Presidents of Peru by era has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Peruvian Armed Forces

Template:Peruvian Armed Forces has been nominated for merging with Template:Military of Peru. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --ZiaLater (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]