User talk:MikeAllen/Oct-Dec 2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Thanks for moving the Strangers films

I was reading this when I checked wiki and you got to it already. Cheers. Crafterstar (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Mike Allen 18:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I made my "The Killer" edit because it seems to fit well with the plot and has been done before in the movies "Dogville." I couldn't find another place to talk to you, so I did it here. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably because Dogville has a more complicated plot that benefited from being broken down like that. Does the chapters in The Killer display on screen with those titles? Mike Allen 18:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. In the film, when a new chapter comes it says for EX: Chapter 2 - Dominican Republic/The Hideout TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 19:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It wouldn't cause any harm or clutter if the Chapter names were included. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not. Mike Allen 12:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Thank you! TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saw franchise

I am confused as to why you reverted my edit where I removed non-recurring characters from a table of recurring characters. The table heading said it was a list of characters who had appeared in two or more films, and everyone I removed had only appeared in one. It feels like you were referring more to the fact that I am an IP editor than the actual substance of my edit. I'd like to assume you were editing in good faith, which is why I am writing this comment to ask if you can clear up my confusion and why you reverted. 2A02:C7C:CC26:9300:C4D8:599E:A95E:F2BB (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was reverted back. All is good. Happy editing! Mike Allen 17:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on my sandbox

Hi! I've seen your edit on

my sandbox for my proposal of a Marketing section for Saw X
, and it's excellent that you've managed to say a lot while, ironically, deleting less than half of my text. (That's a good thing though, don't worry!)

Hope to hear about its status soon, on the article itself. Thanks again!

sudo systemctl enable wptalk 23:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, sorry I meant to get back to you after the edit but got distracted. I mainly trimmed the superfluous details (like explaining what the video was, and about 2 posters being released). I didn't want it to come off promotional sounding. Other than that, I don't object to it being added in a Marketing section. Mike Allen 23:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. So it's clear? Maybe I'll be inactive in a few hours after this, so in the event this ever happens, I'm letting you post it to Saw X. :)
sudo systemctl enable wptalk 01:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Persian Version cast list

Hi, I'm not sure why you edited the cast list on The Persian Version to remove a bunch of actors who are all clearly listed on the movie's IMDb page. Smeetsonian (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Like my edit summary said, not main cast. We are not a database like IMDb, see
WP:IMDB as a source as it is user generated (like Wikipedia) and thus unreliable. If you think the 2 actors you added back are main cast then I support your decision, especially since most of all your edits are to that page, so you must have a better understanding. Thanks. Mike Allen 12:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
They are a part of the main cast, thanks. Smeetsonian (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing... Mike Allen 14:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mike - I noticed your recent edit to this title The Persian Version removed a few key information pieces like the Letterboxd feature - (but more importantly and what I noticed immediately) - the theatrical poster image. Was this in error? I can fix if so. TY :) Boohoolane (talk) 06:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Critical acclaim

ภץאคгöร blatantly disregards
MOS:ACCLAIMED
: "Describing a film with superlatives such as "critically acclaimed" or "box-office bomb" is loaded language and an exceptional claim that must be attributed to multiple high-quality sources". Therefore, there is nothing else to add.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Metacritic clearly states "acclaim". I added sources that also state the film received critical acclaim. One does not have to add reviews in prose to support "critical acclaim" because that would be

WP:SYNTH, since the reviews do not state "acclaim" and just review (praise/criticize) the film as a whole and its aspects. Make it make sense. ภץאคгöร 14:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

You're right, why actually do some prose writing. Maybe partake in talk page discussions that are calling your edits out, not my talk page. Mike Allen 14:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, those sources are not really significant. ScreenRant and MovieWeb, really? Maybe the Los Angeles Times as teeth, but I'm not paying to find out. You just do you, as it seems you are becoming a pro at googling for sources to support "critical acclaim" wording. Mike Allen 14:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a problem with these sources (and also Metacritic), discuss their 'significance' and/or reliability to gain consensus about them. It seems like
synthesize review aggregators and reviews. ภץאคгöร 15:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Halloween II

Hi,

I notice you rolled back my edit regarding H2's modern reassessment for a lack of neutral tone. I'm not sure how this is the case; all my claims were fully sourced and it seemed no different in tone to any other section discussing a film's legacy. Fire Walk With Me's page contains an entire subsection titled 'Reappraisal', which I used as a model for how the section I wrote for H2 should read.

If you can provide any tips on how to improve the content of what I wrote, that would be much appreciated. The film's page certainly needs a section detailing its modern retrospectives; even just a cursory Google search for H2 brings up handfuls of articles discussing the film's reappraisal. It's definitely undergone a major shift in perception and I think that needs to be reflected on the page. BungusBungoloid (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HSMTMTS (Season 4) Poster

Hi! Do you think you can add the poster to the

High School Musical: The Musical: The Series (season 4)
page?

That is the only season page missing a poster. Thank you! Cqntralls (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mike Allen 15:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how you use some of the plugins?

Hi! I'm torn between using different things when I edit on Wikipedia. I see stuff like

HotCat, but like I don't know what to use. I've been on Wikipedia for the better part of a year (note my sort of inactivity last year) and like I stuck with good old source editing (until you indirectly introduced me to the 2017 wikitext editor
) and sometimes switching over to visual editing to easily add a reference.

I wonder what others are out there? (Other than the ones I listed here, of course.) Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 13:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red Warn is like Twinkle and it’s mostly for vandalism. It also has built in rollback templates (no reliable source, disruptive editing, etc). I’m not sure if you are required to have
rollback rights to be able to use it. I’ll look more into it later when I get home (I don’t like using mobile Wiki that much). Hot cat is just a script that helps edit categories. You can also go into your account settings and go to gadgets to turn a lot of features on. Mike Allen 15:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Gotcha. Maybe I'll go find something I'll like and use that. Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 22:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Dirty South (film)

I undid your change. My apologies but.....

It clearly says music by both: Tyler Forrest & Blake Phillips Themovieguy2023 (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No it does not. Blake Phillips is listed as "music soundtrack producer". Tyler Forrest is the composer. Per
WP:RS: Tyler Forrest is the COMPOSER. Mike Allen 02:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Are you familiar with music for film? I am.
However, If you would like to alter the publication to list specifically that " Music Soundtrack: Blake Phillips " go right ahead. I didn't want to rebuild the letterbox. But Blake Phillips is indeed the films co-music producer. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it up and you will be reported for edit warring. You’re blatantly ignoring Wikipedia guidelines. What the hell did I alter? That’s what he is listed as on IMDB, that YOU cited. Mike Allen 02:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean any offense. I am actually responsible for publishing/marketing for the film/distro/music side of things. And I'm telling you that the music is done by both of those individuals. You will see an arsenal of publications in the coming weeks before the films theatrical release on the tenth of Nov.
Are you aware the film won "best cinematography" at the Chelsea Film Festival? https://chelseafilm.org/the-dirty-south/
Again, just kindly as one professional to another I ask, the switch be made. I didn't want to re-arrange the letterbox.
Thank you, kindly. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 11:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You shouldn’t be editing the article at all per
WP:COI. Mike Allen 12:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Wikipedia does not promote films. Mike Allen 12:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point of drafting an article if it's verifiably incorrect? I'd say that falls on the lines of unethical. Again not sure what your problem is with you and being rude and calling me names. That goes against wiki policy as well. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So i'll be on the lookout to see if you fix that error. If not I'll make a complaint that your page is inaccurate. Giving the proper credit to people and their intellectual property should be paramount.If you need additional verifiable references, just let me know.
Thanks and have a great day! Themovieguy2023 (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you work in marketing then release a theatrical release poster with BILLING CREDITS. Just because something may be inaccurate on Wikipedia doesn’t prevent the person from getting credit and paid through the company they work for. So I don’t who you are going to report me to. Mike Allen 14:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you're acting as gate-keeper from someone getting the proper credit on a film. Seems to me you would want your article to be fact based?
I wasn't trying to start a conflict with you. I was trying to work with you on gathering info on the movie and the soundtrack. Did you want to do a soundtrack page to for the film?
I'm just trying to collaborate. Nothing more than that, Mike. Maybe we started off on the wrong foot here. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Themovieguy2023: Matthew Yerby said: "And, you know, Tyler Forrest really crushed it, he not only did all the original songs for the film, but he also did every original score." source Mike Allen 23:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the only one editing Mr. Harrigan's Phone

Hi! I've been mainly editing the leading section of Mr. Harrigan's Phone and so far, nobody has touched it. I just know something feels wrong with what I added in (especially with the part where I added a synopsis), but I just can't put my finger on it. Whenever you're available, mind helping out with this? Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 06:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! When I go through my watchlist (and recovery what IPs have damaged, per usual) I will give it a look. :) Mike Allen 12:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thanks again! (Honestly, it's nice having you around. It's like I got a friend in Wikipedia! Why not join the Discord? I'm pretty much more active there. :>) Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 14:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm never been on Discord. Is it like a message board? Mike Allen 15:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Umm, something like that. Think
AOL Instant Messenger for the modern world. Sorry, fell asleep as you sent your message! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 21:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh, and P.S: I'm about to key in plot details for
MOS:FILMPLOT
, so no more than 700 words. I may go over that with over-the-top details, though I'm picking up the important plot points for the film summary to hopefully make sense.
Sorry if I seem to be relying on only you for help on this, but like... you're one Wikipedian to heavily contribute to film-related articles (and my only approachable sort of online friend). I'm still relatively new to this, and sometimes I skim through the Manual of Style, not actually understanding the brunt of it. Thanks for your patience! :) Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 08:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Plots aren't my strongest parts to edit, but I will do my best. :) Mike Allen 09:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my gosh, thanks again. I'm just tense on getting it out there, since who knows? Other editors may come first and I would have wasted maybe two hours typing up a plot. But hey, at least I tried! :D Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 09:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Soooo... I finished the plot, and I went over 273 words. Whoops! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 10:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...and I've fixed that in your absence (don't worry, no hard feelings!). There's more than just the plot, though! I've added post-production information, and I hope that also makes sense. Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 15:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I get home in a few hours and I’ll look at it. Don’t worry about going over the words at first, it can always be thinned out. Mike Allen 16:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually at 669 words. You can use this site to keep track of word count. My advice would be to watch for
possessed, etc). Good job! Mike Allen 21:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Hehe, thanks! I'll be fixing those in a while. Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 22:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Naughty Nine Poster

Hi! The poster for the Disney Channel Original Movie, The Naughty Nine was just released today![1]


Do you think you can add it to the page? Thank you. Cqntralls (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbs up icon Done Mike Allen 19:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Five Nights at Freddy's (film)

You have the patience of a saint! There should be a Barnstar for that. Knitsey (talk) 22:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I could be wrong

I could be wrong, so thanks for adding your comment.[1] I know it could just as easily have gone the other way but at least I know you would be able to explain it either way. Cheers. -- 109.79.64.12 (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fnaf Critics

Hey Mike, I got a question? I see a tons of critics give it negative reviews some giving it positive reviews and some give it mixed. So would it be mixed reviews from critics also I feel like with fans reception being so big should we put that in. I feel like fans are a big part of the FNAF movie and why we have it. DemoJoker47 (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the reviews are negative and sources have wrote about the film being not well received by critics. I'm sure it will be written into the article soon about the fan reception. For example, Deadline just wrote today: "Again, Blumhouse made this pic strictly for the fans, not older audiences, and that choice is paying off in spades, now with a CinemaScore of A-. How often do you see a horror movie get that type of grade? They’re typically Bs and Cs, and Freddy’s is in the neighborhood of Get Out (A-)." Mike Allen 22:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand but with fans being a big part of the movie and critics hating it but fans loving it shouldn’t we add that for the wiki for people to understand. DemoJoker47 (talk) 17:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said it can be with multiple reliable sources and written neutrally. We should discuss on the film's talk page the best approach. I think it is pretty obvious to readers when comparing the critic score and the box office numbers. Mike Allen 17:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah thx man! DemoJoker47 (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to ask but where is the film’s talk page? DemoJoker47 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Five Nights at Freddy's (film) Mike Allen 20:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thx DemoJoker47 (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What happened in Saw X while I was gone?

First off, I'm aware this wasn't your fault (I saw the edit history), but the nerve of IPs just... oh my god. Two of my edits were reverted (one restored by someone, another one I had to restore myself) by some people who decided to mess it up with red link spam and sudden rollbacks. I don't know if I should even assume "

semi-protect
the page for now? Maybe we can get an admin to do this.

Thanks as always!

P.S. I'm not mad at you— you're the only Wikipedian I could talk to about some stuff. Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 15:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It must be because it was recently released on digital, because it has been quite stable. If they continue being disruptive today I will put in for page protection. Mike Allen 16:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Apologies if I've disturbed you in an inconvenient time then and now. You're such a big help! <3 Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 01:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reversion

Hi Mike why did u revert my edit on the FNAF movie? Just asking? HiGuys69420 (talk) 02:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See
MOS:FILMPLOT: The inclusion of mid- and post-credit scenes should be based on the same criteria used to evaluate the relevance of other scenes. It's been removed many times. Mike Allen 20:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Genie (2023 film) has been accepted

Genie (2023 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 09:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of the lead on Freelance

Hi, I would like you to reconsider the revert. The most notable thing about the film right now is that it's been added to the 0% tomatometer list. There's coverage in many places about this. It's not gotten much media coverage otherwise. LK (talk) 02:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mike Allen 02:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much thanks! LK (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saw X recent edits

Hello! I've noticed two new edits on

A part of the plot has become detailed
, and I don't think it should be on Saw X despite the grisly graphic nature of the series as a whole.

What do you think? Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 11:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the plot addition. The first IP, hmm I don't know, it seems a bit wordy. The lead should get to the point in as less words as possible. Mike Allen 21:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I thought so for IP #1. We'll maybe come to a conclusion on this soon. Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 00:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MikeAllen. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Boardwalk

I see you removed Nickelodeon Movies from Under the Boardwalk's credits of the production companies. Well, if you want proof of that, check out the official trailer of the film. It uses the 2008 Nickelodeon Movies logo for the trailer. Can you please look into that? 2600:6C51:627F:4D5:296B:4D8E:887A:E5EE (talk) 01:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The film credits say otherwise. We will go with that instead of promotional materials. Thanks. Mike Allen 01:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Come on... It's even printed on the poster credits, not it's logo, but it's still in PRINT. Also, if you care about being in film credits so much, why is Anomalisa still in the list of films? It's not credited in the movie ANYWHERE. And I doubt the reliability of it's source. And that's just ONE source. 2600:6C51:627F:4D5:A15F:C755:F4C4:F1D7 (talk) 06:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wish reviews

Rotten Tomatoes has a tomatometer that reveals the rating of a film or tv show. It sounds like you are not familiar with the website. A rotten rating with the splat symbol and numbers from 0-59% mean negative reviews while a fresh rating with the tomato symbol and numbers from 60-100% mean positive reviews. Since Wish has a tomatometer rating in the 50s, that means it has a rotten rating. Cosmic2992 (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am very familiar with the site and how it works. We do not ever post that a film has a "rotten" rating or a "fresh" rating. What are you talking about? Was that your IP? If so, please do not remove the RT prose template again. Mike Allen 22:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No it was different editor who was trying to explain how the tomatometer works. Sounds like the wiki table for Rotten Tomatoes needs to be updated.Cosmic2992 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's literally saying 59% of 54 critics' reviews are positive. It's not meaning the film got positive reviews as a whole. What are you not understanding? Mike Allen 22:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just figuring out why the rotten numbers are being mistakened for positive numbers. But I think the tomatometer depends on the amount of positive and negative reviews from critics a title gets.2603:9000:A006:B2AB:1A5:B892:E427:964F (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best. Christmas. Ever! 

I posted snippet of review from an award winning movie critic about Best. Christmas. Ever! and it was removed for non-sensical reason. 
No valid to reason to remove a review listed on Rotten Tomatoes from one of it's movie critics. Claiming a movie review isn't valid because it aired on a radio station is absurd.
Biography:Russ Simmons is a two-time winner of the National Entertainment Journalism Award for "Best TV Movie Critic." His reviews have appeared in print, broadcast and online outlets for over 20 years. Russ is a long-time member of the Critics' Choice Association and the Kansas City Film Critics' Circle, the nation's second oldest critics group.

Publications: KKFI-FM (Kansas City), WDAF-TV (Kansas City) Critics' Group: Kansas City Film Critics Circle Onfoggymountain (talk) 02:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


My Rodrick Rules edit

My apologies, I did not mean to add back the "mixed reviews" description to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules (2022 film), I was just trying to italicize the Cabin Fever film's title but readded all that by accident. Harryhenry1 (talk) 14:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I thought it was unusual for you to add that. It seems to be from the same IP ranges, most likely a banned user. There's so many, I can't keep up. lol Mike Allen 14:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas...Again?! Poster

Hi!

Do you think you can add the poster to the Christmas...Again?! page please?

Thank you and Happy Thanksgiving! <3 Cqntralls (talk) 18:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done and hope you had a good Thanksgiving. Mike Allen 00:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haunted Mansion

Sorry, but the movie had $150 million budget and after many months grossed only $118 million worldwide. Thats some kind of censorship from your side or why do you changing my edits? The movie is clearly box-office bomb and its sourced fact. Dasomm (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cite a
WP:CITE (and all of the other blue links provided for you here) before editing again. Mike Allen 22:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

FNAF Movie 2: should it be put?

Hi :)

Since the sequel of the Five Nights at Freddy's is confirmed to be "in the works" (via The Hollywood Handle, here at https://thehollywoodhandle.co/2023/movies/five-nights-at-freddys-2-emma-tammi-returning-as-director/), I'm here to ask: should that be mentioned on its article, is it just pure bogus, or it's just a rumor and it shouldn't be taken as accurate information? Regardless, I still would like to know some confirmation. Have a good day.

- SupraMerioBros. (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. We should wait until more concrete sources report on it. It's so early that it doesn't even have an IMDb page. Mike Allen 01:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks.
- SupraMerioBros. (talk) 01:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mothers Instinct poster removal (embargo)

User has been directed to go through Wikipedia:Contact us/Licensing (or Wikipedia:Files for discussion)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi Mike, please could you kindly remove the poster from the Mother Instinct Wikipedia.

we Cybertheftwatch.com represent Anton films, who owns certain rights to this title. The poster is not set for release and we have issued notices across different sites to get posters contained for the time being

we kindly ask you remove it. We have also issued a DMCA notice to source site provided but hope you can remove it faster.

kindly,

James cyber theft watch Ctwjames (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Contact us/Licensing:
Are you concerned that something you've found here is in breach of copyright? If you're worried that we're using your copyrighted works improperly, you can email us at info-en-c@wikimedia.org . Please provide the address or title of the page, and evidence to show that you are the legitimate copyright holder. If you prefer to use the formal
Wikipedia:Copyvio101
for how to flag the issue; alternatively, you can also use the email address above.
Mike Allen 21:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mike, we didn't feel a DMCA notice was appropriate due to the nature of this situation. As explained this poster has been leaked early and we wish for you to remove it until it is officially released next year as part of a full press release. Once officially released next year, we would have no issue with this being shared hence why we didn't want to issue a notice and had hoped you would simply just remove it temporarily. I would happily send you over evidence that Anton are a rights holder (as also indicated on your Wikipedia page but also we are an agent acting on behalf of Anton). Hope you can just apply some common sense and good will here so we don't have to issue a notice. Hope to hear from you soon and thank you in advance, James Ctwjames (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you the proper channel to go through. I can not delete files, as I am not an administrator. It's just a poster, not the film itself. I have never heard of a company complaining about a poster being "leaked". As far as I know you are an anonymous user on Wikipedia. Mike Allen 03:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Concern regarding Draft:Gnomes (upcoming film)

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 00:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding Draft:I Am Sybil

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 00:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Godzilla vs. Kong

I'm sorry, but in what universe is stuff that happens onscreen defined as "not part of the film" while behind the scenes material is? 92.6.175.229 (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated source (removed)

Mike - we have issued a DMCA Notice now for the mothers instinct poster but this is of urgency. Wikipedia is the only source now as your originally uploaded sourced has removed the content due to a DMCA notice we filed.

Please update your source and remove. DMCA can take sometime but the fact that your uploaded poster / original source has now removed the poster should be saying something.please upload any other image instead, this, you can do Ctwjames (talk) 04:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, it is not the official poster? How did it get released? I've never seen film poster be "leaked" and then get DMCA take down notices - which is why I was hesitant to believe your request. It's very unusual, especially not for a high profile film. Needless to say, it's been tagged for deletion. Thanks. Mike Allen 13:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mike if you would like to provide your email I would happily copy you into all the facts and stress for promotion that goes into making films! This is not normal but it was a leak! Thank you for all your help Ctwjames (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure you can email me here: Special:EmailUser/MikeAllen Mike Allen 13:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello,

This edit and calling my edits disruptive is......, how can I put it ? unfriendly. I will rollback to my version first to amend the point you think Is crucial (no mention of audience scores, if that is what you mention in your ES). Thank you. Should you disagree with anything, please go the talk page. Thank you again.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Covenant (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Covenant (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 11 § The Covenant (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Response posted on Poor Things talk page

That's it. Thanks.

John315 (talk) 03:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A film article was overrun by IPs (and possibly some registered editors)

Hey, Mike! Sorry for the sudden message, but Leave the World Behind is broken. Jesus Christ, these IPs really can't find anything better to do. I've restored what I can, but for a handful of templates, I don't know which ones were there, and I don't feel like going through edit history right now since I'm as busy as it is in my real life.

Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 06:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested page protection. Hopefully it is put in place soon. Mike Allen 10:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I sure hope so too. Thanks again! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 14:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It got protected.. for 3 days... Mike Allen 22:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Better than nothing, I guess. Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 02:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Camping out on "Ferrari (2023 film)" page

I noticed that you seem to be camping out on the page for Ferrari (2023 film), and wrote this passive-aggressive response to one of my good faith edits: [(Rollback edit(s) by Obversa (talk): WP:DAILYMAIL is a blacklisted source (which you had to bypass the filters to add) (RW 16.1) undothank Tags: Wikipedia:RedWarn]"

However, this may be a misuse of RedWarn. Quoting the RW page: "Do not forget that you are responsible for all edits made with RedWarn. You have the chance to review every action you make. You must use this tool within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or risk being blocked from editing. RedWarn is a powerful tool, and some behaviour is strongly discouraged, including but not limited to: Misusing the alert on change option to violate Wikipedia:Ownership of content or Wikipedia:Edit warring."

Making passive-aggressive comments against other editors directly goes against Wikipedia's editing policy, particularly . Please re-review

Wikipedia:Edit war, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and Wikipedia:Assume good faith
.

If the passive-aggressive behavior continues, I will have to report your misuse of the RedWarn system to the Ultraviolet Team. It is fine to use the RedWarn system to revert edits, but not to make inflammatory comments.

Furthermore, please re-review

an about-self fashion." The article also stipulates that the Daily Mail itself is not "banned" as a source, and that "Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may not be suitable for certain uses depending on the situation. When in doubt, defer to the linked discussions for more detailed information on a particular source and its use. Consensus can change, and if more recent discussions considering new evidence or arguments reach a different consensus, this list should be updated to reflect those changes." Obversa (talk) 19:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Read
WP:FILM, we can. The best course of action would be to find a useable source and stop making threats on my talk page. Really "camping out"? Mike Allen 19:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Blanking sourced content

Please do not remove sourced content based on your own personal analysis as you did in

what you think is true, or you could complain to the reliable sources that they got it wrong. Please also see template:Infobox film for more instructions on how to use the template. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I used the film’s credits as a primary source. Screen Daily is the ONLY website that says Netflix Animation. It’s not what I think is true but ok sir. I’ll take it off my watchlist because I don’t appreciate this type of warning. Like I just opened my account today or something and need Wikipedia guidelines blue linked. Woooow. Mike Allen 15:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the World Behind (film)

Hello Mike Allen,

I've noticed there are several people who have somewhat engaged in a writing-cum editing contest in the plot section of the film. Leave the World Behind. I understand there are many who wish to contribute, but the addition of too many details, especially minute ones - are unnecessary.

I did manage to shorten the plot to satisfy Wiki's plot-writing limit at 700 words, but within a few hours more editors show up, adding to this edit fight, of sorts. Such extra, minute facts - which I found on the edits just after mine, such as:

(1).Paragraph 2: "... and a quick news broadcast on the radio claims that an environmental disaster has occurred and the migration pattern of animals have been erratic..."

(2).Paragraph 2: "... two then see a massive flock of birds flying in circles erratically..."

(3).Paragraph 3: "... exploding most windows and all lights..."

These are minute facts in the movie, but aren't pivotal ones. By time these occur, the characters and the film audience will have already grasped the precariousness of the film's events. The extra details only serve to cross the boundary set by Wikipedia. It's best to keep the plot unedited after this melee.

I trust you could understand my viewpoint, and would thus assist to deter any other Wiki user from adding to this conflict.

Thank you Yours sincerely, User: Silver Pavilion Silver Pavilion (talk) 00:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pan and Wendy

Hey, I saw you reverted my edit on the Peter Pan & Wendy film about whether the reviews are mixed or roughly good.

I've just checked the reviews and overall they are between 50-60% or 5-6/10. And one Rotten Tomatoes, the user reviews are at 11%.

So I would really call that mixed reviews rather than good.

Anyway, have a good one, Mariiin 9 (talk) 11:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello MikeAllen, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Merry Christmas! Mike Allen 12:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello MikeAllen, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and you as well! Mike Allen 12:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User disrupting Napoleon 2023 (Film) page

Hello, I’d like to ask your support to handle with the user IAmNMFlores, who is constantly messing the many pages on Wikipedia. He was blocked before for insisting in nonsense information supported in wrong way. Now, it seems he deleted his block and bad information from his talk page but you can see it in his talk page records. This time he’s disrupting Napoleon 2023 (Film) page by constantly adding Apple TV+ as a theatrical distributor. He was advised many times that this is nonsense and he should not insisting in this, that Apple TV+ is simply a streaming service and theatrical distribution of Napoleon film is made by Sony. So I simply don’t know what to do about in this scenario when the information is clearly wrong and the other person insists. It’s a bit absurd keep insisting Apple TV+ is a theatrical distributor. I’m asking your help because I see you’re quite active in Napoleon 2023 (film) page and are most experienced than me in Wikipedia. Kind regards and marry Christmas. :) 

PepGuardi (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I missed your post! It looks like a discussion about this is at
WP:FILM talk page. Hope you a wonderful Christmas. :) Mike Allen 20:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Administrator changes

added Clovermoss
readded Dennis Brown
removed

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "https://twitter.com/disneychannel/status/1717950851040296971?s=46". X (formerly Twitter). Retrieved 2023-10-27. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MikeAllen/Oct-Dec_2023&oldid=1195375152"