User talk:Mnemeson

This user may have left Wikipedia. Mnemeson has not edited Wikipedia since 24 September 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

For conversations before November 2006, please see User talk:Mnemeson/archive1

Please leave your new messages at the bottom of the page. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise, and will usually paste a copy of that here in order to provide an unbroken copy of the conversation.

I note from Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics that you're a member of WikiProjects Politics and are based in the UK. I was wondering if you might be able to contribute to a peer review of Socialist Studies, a political group in the UK active since 1991. The request for peer review can be found at Wikipedia:Peer review/Socialist Studies (1989)/archive1. —Psychonaut 05:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you had contacted me prior to putting this "deletion propsal" up as i want a Wiki for my Simm. But Wikia does not allow the freedom that Wikipedia does, and in one sense Wikia wouldn't allow me to create my own Wiki. So I would like a full explanation of why my article is being deleted, how am i supposed to contribute if all my attempts are deleted? --Trip Johnson

So what would you suggest to remedy the issue. Let the festival gain a few years, and in size, so its more notable? Im new, first article, and am completely unschooled at formatting and such. I tried putting 1 quick source at the bottom, Ill need to find more, but yeah, while notable in size (we had about 500 people), it might not be notable in relevance just yet. We just wanted to document the festival, and get the word out for next years event. PS. If you're in the area, come on out in August. —The preceding

An example that might go well is

this article - it also doesn't include references, so it's not a good article, but it does assert the notability, by referring to a national phenomena, rather than any one show, and by saying they've been around for two centuries. Obviously, you'll never be able to create an article saying that yours has been around that long (;-)), but it gives an example of how to assert notability, even without proving it with sources. To be honest, letting the article on Maq Gold be deleted, and then recreating it in a few years when it's shown its longevity, its relevance, and you can find newspapers (or even books) that refer to it might be best. I'm not telling you what to do, for all I know the closing administrator might decide that the {prod} was wrong and the article should stay, these are just some ideas to bear in mind. Oh, and thanks for the invite - really - but I'm in England, so I'll probably never make it. I do hope the event goes well, though :) --Mnemeson 15:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Watch Out for Naughty Page Vandalism

Hello Mnemeson, sorry that I have to be the bearer of bad news and tell you that your page was recently vandalized. I reverted it however and took a look at your contributions. I think you deserve a little something like this:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Persian Poet Gal, hereby award Mnemeson this anti-vandalism barnstar for countless vandalism reverts. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note about ArbCom proceeding

Hiya, just wanted to drop you a courtesy note to let you know about a current

Rory Meacham is a real person and he still resides in Hemet ca so he belongs in the "Rory" article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.66.55 (talk • contribs)

Hi there - If you can find sources that refer to him in such a way, you are free to add him back in, this will need to comply with our policies on

weasel words", that do not comply with this. --Mnemeson 20:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

It looks like you've already given this user a final warning, so I thought you might like to know they are continuing to vandalize pages. Hopefully this is the right way to contact you about this problem. Paladinwannabe2 19:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...
	Hello Mnemeson, Are you interested in Commander in Chief . Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying. Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 21:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply] This message has been delivered by WikiProject United States Government . You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace. Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.	Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

Hello, Mnemeson, this message is being sent to inform you that, due to over two years editing inactivity, your username has been taken off of the list of Wikipedia Project Star Trek active conributers. If you have returned to active editing Wikipedia, please re add your name to the list of active contributers. Thank you, -- Alpha Quadrant (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards,