User talk:Mrjoegoldberg

Hello, Mrjoegoldberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruchita Jadhav, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Chaya Singh, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello Mrjoegoldberg! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Whpq thanks you for noted me! these mistake's are genuine, I am very sorry for this, I will take care of this in future. And I will try not to make such mistake in future. Mr Goldberg 17:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mrjoegoldberg, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pharoah Thanks you for inviting me the Tea house! i know recently I made many mistakes on Wikipedia. So i am really sorry for those mistakes. Mr Goldberg 08:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrjoegoldberg. Thank you for your work on

please add the appropriate infobox

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I got to know that you are connected to articles related to sufism and Sunnism. Please be a Member of Sunni Community Wikimedia. —|

Hi Mrjoegoldberg! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you! KJ Mr Goldberg 08:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rajshree Singh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asjad Raza Khan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 (talk) 18:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Balchandra Maheshwar Gupte, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

I will suggest you to please go through AFC process for your further content creation as I have draftified most of your articles as it was not ready for mainspace. Maliner (talk) 09:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tafsir Khaza'in-al-Irfan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arnold Shore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windsor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Sharvari Wagh, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gonuguntla Suryanarayana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Maliner (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This book does not have sufficient reliable coverage from secondary sources. The only references that this article currently contains are 9 different links to the same book. Just because a product exists does not make it notable according to Wikipedia's

notability guidelines

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tamheed Ul Iman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Waqf Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Active.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya - thanks for the new article (now marked as 'reviewed' and so searchable), but you might consider throwing a project tag or two on the talk page - that way, other editors interested in relevant project areas can see the piece and contribute to it! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yeah that's a great suggestion. I'll try in future. Mr Goldberg 16:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anwar Mohammad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kfar Aza massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Claiming "non-notable" for one of the most media-covered events is not serious and makes it hard to assume good faith. This seems like pure WP:IDONTLIKEIT Jeppiz (talk) 08:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mrjoegoldberg: following your creation of the article Khan Ghufran Zahidi, I added the biography project tag {{WikiProject Biography}} with the living parameter because the article did not specify if the subject was living or deceased; it did not provide a death date but was written in past tense about the subject's career. If you believe this was an error, I recommend adding a reliable source for the death of the subject and then the biography of living persons policy won't apply. Thanks, microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 14:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for noticing me. Actually I am also unable to find his death date. But I am trying. I will update the article as soon as the death date is received.

again thanks you. Regards. Mr Goldberg 14:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrjoegoldberg,

Thank you for creating Mishkat Al-anwar.

In spite of six sources, this stub tells the reader nothing about the content or notability of the book. If this cannot be remedied, the page should probably be nominated for deletion. I'm holding off on that, however, in the hopes that what's here can be fleshed out a little bit with appropriate sourcing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PatrickJWelsh}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Thanks for creating articles about Islamic scholars on the encyclopedia. It really makes a difference.

─

Thanks You (Redacted). Mr Goldberg 08:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrjoegoldberg. Thank you for your work on

Maybe I should have AFD'd this based on wp:NotNews plus wP:Notability's incorporation of it. But the particulars of the even and widespread coverage of it IMO made it an edge case and I'm marking it as reviewed. Thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrjoegoldberg. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jila' al-Khatir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 14:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mahboob Ahmad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sock.

S0091 (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.