User talk:NANGA

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Daniel Hayes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please also read

Please, after your block, make your edit suggestions at

WP:COI

. I try to keep the article neutral and factual, and the "awards" I removed are from a company which gives out a massive number of "awards" every month, which means that they are not distinctive or authoritative ion any way, but just a way to boost the supposed importance and quality of a movie or documentary. Whether the other awards are important enough to be listed should be researched, at first glance they seem to be somewhat more selective at least.

But nearly everything you added was problematic, making the article read like a promo text or the kind of biography one finds on a fansite or a personal website, not something a neutral observer would write.

So, for the final time, please don't edit the article any mlonger but use the talk page instead.

Fram (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

These are the kind of requests you need to make, after your block has expired, at the article talk page. Some, like the outdated festival information, shouldn't be a problem. Something like his nationality and place of birth will be more of an issue. This 2010 press release claims he is a Toronto-born actor, and then 25 years old (i.e. born in 1985, not 1989). See e.g. also this article.

Fram (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

"If the edits are rejected we would need to delete the page completely since the current content is not accurate. " That is not your call at all though. That the current content doesn't match the myth-making intended by some people seemingly working on behalf of the subject is the problem of badly done myth-making and stories which change too often (how is his Olympic career working out, by the way?).

Fram (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

All evidence contradicts you.

Fram (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Of course, the word "evidence" is used in all manner of contexts (something a real lawyer would know). Between this and the mention of slander at Fram's talk page, I suspect a final downfall on

WP:NOLEGAL (which you should read) is coming. Pinkbeast (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Daniel Hayes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martin I have no intention to continue using Wikipidea after this issue is resolved we are just awaiting confirmation from you that the final update to the page meets the guidelines. I am completely turned off by the language your representative are using with users on your behalf "to keep some of this junk off Fram's talk page..... have reverted this promotional junk" NANGA (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you using the pronoun "we"? Usernames are supposed to be for individuals; please see Wikipedia:Username policy — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And no, the latest version is not up to Wikipedia's standards as it is not neutrally written. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to revert it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello please advise if the 24 hours period has expired or not. Thank you NANGA (talk) 08:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes your block has expired — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you NANGA (talk) 11:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Administrators, Please advise how to delete the user page NANGA and contributor account from Wikipedia. I am using a different platform at this time for encyclopedia work projects there is no need for this user account to remain active online. Thank you for the answerNO44 17:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ#How_do_I_change_my_username.2Fdelete_my_account.3F Pinkbeast (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the only option available on this site is to request a username changed since deletion is not an option or adding the reference it is not clear exactly where the reference needs to be listed on the page I am requesting a username change to GoodbyeNO44.2600:8802:200:3970:80CB:EC7B:363F:FA23 (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like you want to change your user account name. Deleting your user page does not delete the user account. Please see Wikipedia:Changing username. There is a section at the bottom named "Venues". Select one of those and make your request per the instructions. — Maile (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a link you can post for your VENUES section I do not see it at the bottom of any page. 2600:8802:200:3970:80CB:EC7B:363F:FA23 (talk) 20:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the page I linked. You have to scroll down to the bottom of the page. There is a section titled "Venues", and gives you a selection of 4 different ways to change your user name. Everything that is above the Venues section is advice on which selection of best for you to use. But if you've having trouble seeing it, I'll copy and paste it below for you. — Maile (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venues:

It's important to choose the right venue for your request; otherwise, it may be delayed or declined. Once you are sure, proceed to the correct venue and follow the instructions there:

• WP:ENABLEEMAIL and Help:Email confirmation
  .) Use the other venues if a confirmed email address is not available or for complex requests.
• Simple – For renames to usernames that are not already taken. Check Special:CentralAuth to see whether the username you want is available - if it is taken on any project, it is not available for use.
• Usurpations – For renames to usernames that are already taken and have no significant edits or log actions and there are no significant attached accounts on other projects.
• Meta for usernames that have no significant edits or log actions, but have significant attachments on other projects.